Faktorska struktura i psihometrijske karakteristike hrvatske kratke verzije Upitnika kvocijenta empatije

Q4 Psychology Suvremena Psihologija Pub Date : 2016-10-10 DOI:10.21465/2016-SP-191-09
Anja Wertag, Ivana Hanzec
{"title":"Faktorska struktura i psihometrijske karakteristike hrvatske kratke verzije Upitnika kvocijenta empatije","authors":"Anja Wertag, Ivana Hanzec","doi":"10.21465/2016-SP-191-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Empathy Quotient (EQ, Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004) measures empathy as an ability to identify what someone else is thinking and feeling, and to respond to their thoughts and feelings with an appropriate emotion. Although the questionnaire was developed in order to be sensitive to empathy deficits as a part of psychopathology, it is often used in other areas of psychological research as well. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the short version of the translated Empathy Quotient (EQ-28) that has psychometric superiority over the original version (Lawrence et al., 2004). Data was collected on-line on a convenient sample (N = 115 ; 81 female and 34 male) with a mean age of 31.30 (SD = 7.49), within a larger study. The results of the principal component analysis showed a clear three-factor solution consistent with the structure proposed by Lawrence et al. (2004). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicated high internal consistency of the Cognitive Empathy and the Emotional Reactivity subscales, unlike the Social Skills subscale. The correlations of the EQ-28 subscales and the relevant subscales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1983) provided information about the convergent validity of the Cognitive Empathy and the Emotional Reactivity subscales, while the correlations with measures of altruism (measured by HEXACOPI- R, Lee & Ashton, 2004) and the Dark Triad (Jones & Paulhus, 2014) showed the theoretically expected relationships between the given constructs. On the basis of the results of this preliminary study it can be concluded that the Croatian version of the EQ-28 has satisfactory metric characteristics and represents a good measure of cognitive and affective empathy, but these results should be replicated on a larger and more gender balanced sample.","PeriodicalId":35108,"journal":{"name":"Suvremena Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21465/2016-SP-191-09","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suvremena Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21465/2016-SP-191-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Empathy Quotient (EQ, Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004) measures empathy as an ability to identify what someone else is thinking and feeling, and to respond to their thoughts and feelings with an appropriate emotion. Although the questionnaire was developed in order to be sensitive to empathy deficits as a part of psychopathology, it is often used in other areas of psychological research as well. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the short version of the translated Empathy Quotient (EQ-28) that has psychometric superiority over the original version (Lawrence et al., 2004). Data was collected on-line on a convenient sample (N = 115 ; 81 female and 34 male) with a mean age of 31.30 (SD = 7.49), within a larger study. The results of the principal component analysis showed a clear three-factor solution consistent with the structure proposed by Lawrence et al. (2004). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicated high internal consistency of the Cognitive Empathy and the Emotional Reactivity subscales, unlike the Social Skills subscale. The correlations of the EQ-28 subscales and the relevant subscales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1983) provided information about the convergent validity of the Cognitive Empathy and the Emotional Reactivity subscales, while the correlations with measures of altruism (measured by HEXACOPI- R, Lee & Ashton, 2004) and the Dark Triad (Jones & Paulhus, 2014) showed the theoretically expected relationships between the given constructs. On the basis of the results of this preliminary study it can be concluded that the Croatian version of the EQ-28 has satisfactory metric characteristics and represents a good measure of cognitive and affective empathy, but these results should be replicated on a larger and more gender balanced sample.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚人移情简表的因子结构和心理测量特征
同理心商数(EQ, Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright, 2004)将同理心作为一种能力来衡量,即识别他人的想法和感受,并以适当的情绪回应他们的想法和感受。虽然该问卷是为了对共情缺陷敏感而开发的,作为精神病理学的一部分,但它也经常用于心理学研究的其他领域。因此,本研究的目的是确定翻译后的移情商(EQ-28)的简短版本的因素结构和心理测量特性,该版本在心理测量上优于原始版本(Lawrence et al., 2004)。数据在线采集方便样本(N = 115;81名女性和34名男性),平均年龄为31.30岁(SD = 7.49)。主成分分析结果显示了一个清晰的三因素解,与Lawrence et al.(2004)提出的结构一致。Cronbach α系数显示认知共情和情绪反应分量表与社交技能分量表具有较高的内部一致性。EQ-28子量表与人际反应指数相关子量表(Davis, 1983)的相关性提供了认知共情和情绪反应子量表的收敛效度信息,而与利他主义量表(HEXACOPI- R, Lee & Ashton, 2004)和黑暗人格量表(Jones & Paulhus, 2014)的相关性显示了给定构式之间的理论预期关系。根据这项初步研究的结果,可以得出结论,克罗地亚版本的EQ-28具有令人满意的度量特征,代表了认知和情感共情的良好测量,但这些结果应该在更大、更性别平衡的样本上得到复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suvremena Psihologija
Suvremena Psihologija Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cross-lagged links between emotional clarity and emotion regulation strategies during the transition to adolescence – a two-wave study Psihofiziološke promjene uzrokovane smjenskim radom Physical and Other Activities in the Community as Support for Active and Healthy Aging Some Aspects of the Life of Single Adults Doprinos psihosocijalnih čimbenika duljini života dugovječnih osoba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1