Macedonia's Ohrid Framework Agreement Reexamined in Response to Internal and External Crises: Reason for Cautious Optimism on Europe's Southeastern Border

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2016-04-11 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2763264
A. Ruffer
{"title":"Macedonia's Ohrid Framework Agreement Reexamined in Response to Internal and External Crises: Reason for Cautious Optimism on Europe's Southeastern Border","authors":"A. Ruffer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2763264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, a number of variables put Macedonia at an increased risk of instability. These factors include Macedonia’s tense relationship with Greece, the strain posed by the European migration crisis, the potential for escalation of simmering interethnic conflict within Macedonia’s borders, and Macedonia’s recent government scandals. Because of the security risks that an unstable Macedonia poses to the European Union (EU), it is crucial for the EU to seek new ways to bring Macedonia closer into the fray of European institutions. This Note assesses the continued durability of existing domestic and regional legal regimes to cope with the increased strain caused by the abovementioned destabilizing factors. The Note poses several ways in which the EU can use Membership to create a more durable legal regime in Macedonia; and it discusses some of the major impediments that the EU should consider when deciding the proper incentive structure to use in Membership discussions. Given Macedonia’s baseline for rule of law and proven desire to join the EU, there is reason for cautious optimism that Macedonia’s legal regime will remain durable if the EU uses the reward of EU accession tactfully in the coming years.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"55 1","pages":"457-498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2763264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, a number of variables put Macedonia at an increased risk of instability. These factors include Macedonia’s tense relationship with Greece, the strain posed by the European migration crisis, the potential for escalation of simmering interethnic conflict within Macedonia’s borders, and Macedonia’s recent government scandals. Because of the security risks that an unstable Macedonia poses to the European Union (EU), it is crucial for the EU to seek new ways to bring Macedonia closer into the fray of European institutions. This Note assesses the continued durability of existing domestic and regional legal regimes to cope with the increased strain caused by the abovementioned destabilizing factors. The Note poses several ways in which the EU can use Membership to create a more durable legal regime in Macedonia; and it discusses some of the major impediments that the EU should consider when deciding the proper incentive structure to use in Membership discussions. Given Macedonia’s baseline for rule of law and proven desire to join the EU, there is reason for cautious optimism that Macedonia’s legal regime will remain durable if the EU uses the reward of EU accession tactfully in the coming years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部和外部危机对马其顿奥赫里德框架协议的重新审视:对欧洲东南边界持谨慎乐观态度的理由
近年来,一些变量使马其顿面临更大的不稳定风险。这些因素包括马其顿与希腊的紧张关系、欧洲移民危机带来的压力、马其顿境内酝酿中的种族间冲突升级的可能性,以及马其顿最近的政府丑闻。由于不稳定的马其顿给欧盟带来了安全风险,欧盟必须寻求新的方式,让马其顿更接近欧洲机构的纷争。本说明评估了现有国内和区域法律制度的持续持久性,以应对上述不稳定因素造成的日益严重的压力。《说明》提出了欧盟利用成员国身份在马其顿建立更持久法律制度的几种方式;它还讨论了欧盟在决定成员国讨论中使用的适当激励结构时应考虑的一些主要障碍。考虑到马其顿的法治底线和加入欧盟的愿望,有理由谨慎乐观地认为,如果欧盟在未来几年巧妙地利用加入欧盟的奖励,马其顿的法律制度将保持持久。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Over forty years] ago, under the guidance of the late Professor Wolfgang Friedmann, a group of Columbia law students belonging to the Columbia Society of International Law founded the Bulletin of the Columbia Society of International Law. The Bulletin’s first volume, containing two issues, was a forum for the informal discussion of international legal questions; the second volume, published in 1963 under the title International Law Bulletin, aspired more to the tradition of the scholarly law review. Today’s Columbia Journal of Transnational Law is heir to those early efforts.
期刊最新文献
User-Generated Evidence The Domestic Standing of International Law: A Non-State Account The State Power to Boycott a Boycott:: The Thorny Constitutionality of State Anti-BDS Laws Conceiving Criminality: An Evaluation of Abortion Decriminalization Reform in New York and Great Britain Hiding in the Light: The Misuse of Disclosure to Advance the Business and Human Rights Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1