Skill versus inequality

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Panoeconomicus Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2298/pan190828014a
Leyla Arda Özalp, Hüseyin Özalp
{"title":"Skill versus inequality","authors":"Leyla Arda Özalp, Hüseyin Özalp","doi":"10.2298/pan190828014a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores empirical evidence for a connection between income inequality and skill (advanced-level educated workers share) using panel data methods that take into account cross-section dependency and heterogeneity. To assess the income inequality associated with skill, we run a data set for 24 developed The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 1995 to 2018. In order to determine the stationary characteristics of the variables, we employ the Cross-sectionally Augmented Im, Pesaran and Shin (CIPS) test approach. Following this, we employ Westerlund (2007), and Gengenbach, Urbain, and Westerlund (2016) Panel Cointegration tests, and then the Panel Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (PDOLS) estimator. Our empirical test results conclude that there is a relationship between inequality and skill in the long run and the PDOLS estimator findings show that as the skill level in employment increases, inequality decreases. In addition, according to the findings, this negative relationship is more pronounced in the United States, whereas it is more moderate or not valid in European countries. The results obtained are primarily consistent with the framework presented by Daron Acemoglu (2002, 2003). And these findings constitute one of the main contributions of the study in terms of supporting Acemoglu's (2003) thesis that the skill premium is more pronounced in the United States.","PeriodicalId":45222,"journal":{"name":"Panoeconomicus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panoeconomicus","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/pan190828014a","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores empirical evidence for a connection between income inequality and skill (advanced-level educated workers share) using panel data methods that take into account cross-section dependency and heterogeneity. To assess the income inequality associated with skill, we run a data set for 24 developed The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 1995 to 2018. In order to determine the stationary characteristics of the variables, we employ the Cross-sectionally Augmented Im, Pesaran and Shin (CIPS) test approach. Following this, we employ Westerlund (2007), and Gengenbach, Urbain, and Westerlund (2016) Panel Cointegration tests, and then the Panel Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (PDOLS) estimator. Our empirical test results conclude that there is a relationship between inequality and skill in the long run and the PDOLS estimator findings show that as the skill level in employment increases, inequality decreases. In addition, according to the findings, this negative relationship is more pronounced in the United States, whereas it is more moderate or not valid in European countries. The results obtained are primarily consistent with the framework presented by Daron Acemoglu (2002, 2003). And these findings constitute one of the main contributions of the study in terms of supporting Acemoglu's (2003) thesis that the skill premium is more pronounced in the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技能与不平等
本文利用考虑横截面依赖性和异质性的面板数据方法,探讨了收入不平等与技能(受过高等教育的工人分享)之间联系的经验证据。为了评估与技能相关的收入不平等,我们对经济合作与发展组织(OECD) 24个发达国家1995年至2018年的数据集进行了分析。为了确定变量的平稳特性,我们采用了横截面增广Im, Pesaran和Shin (CIPS)检验方法。在此之后,我们采用Westerlund(2007)和Gengenbach, Urbain和Westerlund(2016)面板协整检验,然后使用面板动态普通最小二乘(pols)估计量。我们的实证检验结果表明,从长远来看,不平等与技能之间存在关系,pols估计结果表明,随着就业技能水平的提高,不平等程度会降低。此外,根据研究结果,这种负相关关系在美国更为明显,而在欧洲国家则较为温和或无效。所得结果与Daron Acemoglu(2002,2003)提出的框架基本一致。这些发现构成了该研究的主要贡献之一,支持Acemoglu(2003)的论文,即技能溢价在美国更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Panoeconomicus
Panoeconomicus ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Toward a cashless society. Cash and non-cash payments in Spain, 1989-2014 The short- and long-run relationship between house prices and bank credit in developed and emerging market economies: A comparative study Skill versus inequality Volatility spillover networks of credit risk: Evidence from ASW and CDS spreads in Turkey and Brazil Assessing the impacts of financial stress on the yield spreads of Poland, Mexico and South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1