Pilot Lifestyle Intervention Effect on Lifestyle Behaviors, Psychosocial Factors, and Affect.

Mei-Wei Chang, Duane T Wegener, Alai Tan, Jonathan Schaffir, Brett Worly, Katherine Strafford, Loriana Soma, Cassandra Sampsell
{"title":"Pilot Lifestyle Intervention Effect on Lifestyle Behaviors, Psychosocial Factors, and Affect.","authors":"Mei-Wei Chang, Duane T Wegener, Alai Tan, Jonathan Schaffir, Brett Worly, Katherine Strafford, Loriana Soma, Cassandra Sampsell","doi":"10.26502/jppch.74050147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper presents results of a pilot intervention effect on lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and affect among overweight or obese pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>70 participants were randomized to the intervention or usual care group. During the 20-week intervention, participants completed a weekly online intervention module and joined individual online health coaching. Data were collected at baseline (<17 weeks gestation), 24-27 weeks gestation (T2), and 35-37 weeks gestation (T3). Lifestyle behaviors included dietary intake (caloric, fat, added sugar, fruit, and vegetable) and physical activity (PA). Psychosocial factors were autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, executive functions, and consideration of future consequences (CFC). Affect comprised stress and emotional control. Two-sample <i>t</i>-tests and Cohen's <i>d</i> effect sizes were used to compare between group mean differences in the change from baseline to T2 and T3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T2, intervention positively influenced fruit intake (<i>d</i> = 0.47), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.36), self-efficacy for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.25) and PA (<i>d</i> = 0.24), executive functions (behavior regulation, d = -0.21; metacognition, <i>d</i> = -0.69), and emotional control (<i>d</i> = 0.79). At T3, the intervention improved PA (<i>d</i> = 0.19), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.33), self-efficacy for healthy eating (<i>d</i> = 0.50) and stress management (<i>d</i> = 0.62), executive functions (metacognition, <i>d</i> = -0.46), CFC (<i>d</i> = 0.25), stress (<i>d</i> = -0.45), and emotional control (<i>d</i> = 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pilot intervention has positive effects on most psychosocial variables and affect in both the short and long terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","volume":"1 1","pages":"74-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10994102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jppch.74050147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper presents results of a pilot intervention effect on lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and affect among overweight or obese pregnant women.

Methods: 70 participants were randomized to the intervention or usual care group. During the 20-week intervention, participants completed a weekly online intervention module and joined individual online health coaching. Data were collected at baseline (<17 weeks gestation), 24-27 weeks gestation (T2), and 35-37 weeks gestation (T3). Lifestyle behaviors included dietary intake (caloric, fat, added sugar, fruit, and vegetable) and physical activity (PA). Psychosocial factors were autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, executive functions, and consideration of future consequences (CFC). Affect comprised stress and emotional control. Two-sample t-tests and Cohen's d effect sizes were used to compare between group mean differences in the change from baseline to T2 and T3.

Results: At T2, intervention positively influenced fruit intake (d = 0.47), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.36), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.25) and PA (d = 0.24), executive functions (behavior regulation, d = -0.21; metacognition, d = -0.69), and emotional control (d = 0.79). At T3, the intervention improved PA (d = 0.19), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.33), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.50) and stress management (d = 0.62), executive functions (metacognition, d = -0.46), CFC (d = 0.25), stress (d = -0.45), and emotional control (d = 0.72).

Conclusion: The pilot intervention has positive effects on most psychosocial variables and affect in both the short and long terms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试点生活方式干预对生活方式行为、社会心理因素和情感的影响。
背景:本文介绍了一项对超重或肥胖孕妇的生活方式行为、社会心理因素和情感产生影响的试点干预结果。方法:70 名参与者被随机分配到干预组或常规护理组。在为期 20 周的干预过程中,参与者每周完成一个在线干预模块,并参加个人在线健康辅导。收集基线数据(使用t检验和Cohen's d效应大小比较从基线到T2和T3的变化的组间平均差异):在 T2 阶段,干预措施对水果摄入量(d = 0.47)、健康饮食自主动机(d = 0.36)、健康饮食自我效能(d = 0.25)和 PA(d = 0.24)、执行功能(行为调节,d = -0.21;元认知,d = -0.69)和情绪控制(d = 0.79)产生了积极影响。在 T3 阶段,干预改善了 PA(d = 0.19)、健康饮食自主动机(d = 0.33)、健康饮食自我效能感(d = 0.50)和压力管理(d = 0.62)、执行功能(元认知,d = -0.46)、CFC(d = 0.25)、压力(d = -0.45)和情绪控制(d = 0.72):试点干预对大多数社会心理变量和情感都有短期和长期的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Maternal Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Preterm Birth on the Development of Metabolic Disorders in Offspring. Neurodevelopmental Risk in HIV-Exposed Uninfected Children: Call for Developmental Surveillance. De Novo Crohn's Disease Diagnosed in the Setting of Acute SARS-Cov-2 Infection Requiring Escalation of Infliximab Therapy Guided by Personalized Pharmacokinetics. Occupational dermatoses in health care personnel using PPE during the COVID pandemic. Correlation between Serum Testosterone Level and Erythrocytosis in Adolescent Males- A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1