Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Columbia Law Review Pub Date : 2011-06-01 DOI:10.7916/D88915DF
T. Merrill
{"title":"Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law","authors":"T. Merrill","doi":"10.7916/D88915DF","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American administrative law is grounded in a conception of the relationship between reviewing courts and agencies modeled on the relationship between appeals courts and trial courts in civil litigation. This appellate review model was not an inevitable foundation of administrative law, but it has had far-reaching consequences, and its origins are poorly understood. This Article details how the appellate review model emerged after 1906 as an improvised response by the U.S. Supreme Court to a political crisis brought on by aggressive judicial review of decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Once the jeny-built model was in place, Congress signaled its approval, and an academic-John Dickinson-wrote a persuasive book extolling its virtues. As a result, the appellate review model became entrenched by the 1920s and eventually spread to all of administrative law. The early adoption of the appellate review model helps explain why the Supreme Court never seriously grappled with Article III problems created by the widespread use of administrative agencies to adjudicate cases once the New Deal and the expansion of the administrative state arrived. It also helps explain why the judiciary has played such a large role in the development of administrative policy in the United States relative to other legal systems. INTRODUCTION . .................................................. 940 I. NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND ........................... 946 II. THE EMERGENCE OF THE APPELLATE REVIEW MODEL ........ 953 A. The ICC Crisis ....................................... 953 B. The Hepburn Act .................................... 955 C. Strategic Retreat ..................................... 959 D. The Source of the Appellate Review Model ........... 963 * Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law, Columbia Law School. The Article has benefited from comments by participants in workshops at Chicago, Columbia, Minnesota, and Vanderbilt Law Schools. Special thanks to Charles McCurdy,Jerry Mashaw, and Henry Monaghan for their interest and input. Brad Lipton and Brantley Webb provided valuable research assistance. Some of the material in this Article appears in abbreviated form in Thomas W. Merrill, The Origins of American Style Judicial Review, in Comparative Administrative Law 389 (Susan Rose-Ackerman & Peter L. Lindseth eds., 2011).","PeriodicalId":51408,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law Review","volume":"111 1","pages":"939-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D88915DF","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

American administrative law is grounded in a conception of the relationship between reviewing courts and agencies modeled on the relationship between appeals courts and trial courts in civil litigation. This appellate review model was not an inevitable foundation of administrative law, but it has had far-reaching consequences, and its origins are poorly understood. This Article details how the appellate review model emerged after 1906 as an improvised response by the U.S. Supreme Court to a political crisis brought on by aggressive judicial review of decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Once the jeny-built model was in place, Congress signaled its approval, and an academic-John Dickinson-wrote a persuasive book extolling its virtues. As a result, the appellate review model became entrenched by the 1920s and eventually spread to all of administrative law. The early adoption of the appellate review model helps explain why the Supreme Court never seriously grappled with Article III problems created by the widespread use of administrative agencies to adjudicate cases once the New Deal and the expansion of the administrative state arrived. It also helps explain why the judiciary has played such a large role in the development of administrative policy in the United States relative to other legal systems. INTRODUCTION . .................................................. 940 I. NINETEENTH-CENTURY BACKGROUND ........................... 946 II. THE EMERGENCE OF THE APPELLATE REVIEW MODEL ........ 953 A. The ICC Crisis ....................................... 953 B. The Hepburn Act .................................... 955 C. Strategic Retreat ..................................... 959 D. The Source of the Appellate Review Model ........... 963 * Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law, Columbia Law School. The Article has benefited from comments by participants in workshops at Chicago, Columbia, Minnesota, and Vanderbilt Law Schools. Special thanks to Charles McCurdy,Jerry Mashaw, and Henry Monaghan for their interest and input. Brad Lipton and Brantley Webb provided valuable research assistance. Some of the material in this Article appears in abbreviated form in Thomas W. Merrill, The Origins of American Style Judicial Review, in Comparative Administrative Law 389 (Susan Rose-Ackerman & Peter L. Lindseth eds., 2011).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三章行政机关裁决与行政法上诉审查模式的渊源
美国行政法是以民事诉讼中上诉法院和初审法院之间的关系为蓝本的审查法院和代理机构之间的关系概念为基础的。这种上诉审查模式并不是行政法的必然基础,但它产生了深远的影响,其起源却鲜为人知。本文详细介绍了上诉审查模式是如何在1906年之后作为美国最高法院对州际商务委员会裁决的激进司法审查所带来的政治危机的临时反应而出现的。一旦珍妮建造的模型就位,国会就表示同意,一位学者——约翰·迪金森——写了一本有说服力的书,颂扬了它的优点。因此,上诉审查模式在20世纪20年代变得根深蒂固,并最终扩展到所有行政法。上诉审查模式的早期采用有助于解释为什么在新政和行政国家的扩张到来后,最高法院从未认真解决因广泛使用行政机构来裁决案件而产生的第三条问题。这也有助于解释为什么相对于其他法律制度,司法机构在美国行政政策的发展中发挥了如此大的作用。介绍 . ..................................................940年即19世纪的背景 ...........................946二世。上诉审查模式的出现........953 A。国际刑事法院的危机 .......................................953 b .赫本法案 ....................................955 c战略退却 .....................................959 D.上诉审查模式的来源...........哥伦比亚大学法学院查尔斯·埃文斯·休斯法学教授。这篇文章得益于芝加哥、哥伦比亚、明尼苏达和范德比尔特法学院研讨会参与者的评论。特别感谢Charles McCurdy,Jerry Mashaw和Henry Monaghan的关心和投入。布拉德·利普顿和布兰特利·韦伯提供了宝贵的研究协助。本文中的一些材料以缩略形式出现在托马斯·w·梅里尔的《美国式司法审查的起源》,《比较行政法》第389期(苏珊·罗斯-阿克曼和彼得·l·林德赛斯主编)。, 2011)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Columbia Law Review is one of the world"s leading publications of legal scholarship. Founded in 1901, the Review is an independent nonprofit corporation that produces a law journal edited and published entirely by students at Columbia Law School. It is one of a handful of student-edited law journals in the nation that publish eight issues a year. The Review is the third most widely distributed and cited law review in the country. It receives about 2,000 submissions per year and selects approximately 20-25 manuscripts for publication annually, in addition to student Notes. In 2008, the Review expanded its audience with the launch of Sidebar, an online supplement to the Review.
期刊最新文献
Isolated branched-chain amino acid intake and muscle protein synthesis in humans: a biochemical review. Legal Access to the Global Cloud Criminal Justice, Inc. Separation of Powers Metatheory The Restoration Remedy in Private Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1