Disappointment at Potsdam

J. Bhagwati
{"title":"Disappointment at Potsdam","authors":"J. Bhagwati","doi":"10.7916/D8DB8BPB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIR – Your leader on the Doha round did the negotiations a disservice by joining Susan Schwab, America's trade representative, in her disingenuous attack on India (and Brazil, to a lesser degree) as the cause of the failure of the summit in Potsdam between the United States, the European Union, Brazil and India (―Potsdam's price‖, June 30th). The breakdown at Potsdam was America's fault, not India's. Ms Schwab offered to lower the ceiling on America's distorting agricultural subsidies to $17 billion. As America currently spends only about $11 billion, a ceiling of $17 billion would actually allow it to raise its subsidy level in the future.","PeriodicalId":81145,"journal":{"name":"Economist (London, England : 1843)","volume":"384 1","pages":"18-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economist (London, England : 1843)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8DB8BPB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIR – Your leader on the Doha round did the negotiations a disservice by joining Susan Schwab, America's trade representative, in her disingenuous attack on India (and Brazil, to a lesser degree) as the cause of the failure of the summit in Potsdam between the United States, the European Union, Brazil and India (―Potsdam's price‖, June 30th). The breakdown at Potsdam was America's fault, not India's. Ms Schwab offered to lower the ceiling on America's distorting agricultural subsidies to $17 billion. As America currently spends only about $11 billion, a ceiling of $17 billion would actually allow it to raise its subsidy level in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对波茨坦的失望
先生——你们在多哈回合谈判中的领导人与美国贸易代表苏珊•施瓦布一道,虚伪地指责印度(以及巴西,在较小程度上)是美国、欧盟、巴西和印度在波茨坦举行的峰会失败的原因(—波茨坦价格‖,6月30日),这对多哈回合谈判造成了伤害。波茨坦的崩溃是美国的错,不是印度的错。施瓦布提议将美国扭曲的农业补贴上限降至170亿美元。由于美国目前只花了110亿美元,170亿美元的上限实际上可以让它在未来提高补贴水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disappointment at Potsdam Trials and tribulations: new pressure on drug companies to reveal all about their clinical tests. Pregnant pause: governments should ban reproductive cloning but allow the therapeutic sort. Baby steps: new work shows the promise, and pitfalls, of embryonic stem-cell research. Book review: Ha-Joon Chang (ed.), Rethinking Development Economics, An- them Press, London, 2003. 576 p. GBP 18.95 (ISBN 1 84331 110 0)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1