Nonpharmacological Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient.

Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2023-09-15
Vineet Dhar, Elizabeth Gosnell, Jayakumar Jayaraman, Clarice Law, Martina Majstorović, Abdullah A Marghalani, Cameron L Randall, Janice Townsend, Martha Wells, Chia-Yu Chen, Rachel Wedeward
{"title":"Nonpharmacological Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient.","authors":"Vineet Dhar,&nbsp;Elizabeth Gosnell,&nbsp;Jayakumar Jayaraman,&nbsp;Clarice Law,&nbsp;Martina Majstorović,&nbsp;Abdullah A Marghalani,&nbsp;Cameron L Randall,&nbsp;Janice Townsend,&nbsp;Martha Wells,&nbsp;Chia-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Rachel Wedeward","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To present evidence-based recommendations on nonpharmacological behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. <b>Methods:</b> The work group assessed eight systematic reviews for effectiveness of nonpharmacological behavior guidance techniques in children undergoing preventive care or a dental treatment visit. The key outcomes assessed included cooperative behavior, anxiety, and procedural pain. To formulate the recommendations, the work group used the GRADE framework to obtain consensus on domains such as priority of the problem, certainty of the evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable consequences, patients' values and preferences, acceptability, and feasibility. <b>Results:</b> Overall, the use of basic nonpharmacological behavior guidance techniques resulted in trivial-to-small effect on improvement in behavior or reduction in anxiety. However, for children and adolescents undergoing preventive care, mobile applications and modeling showed large effects in reduction of anxiety. For those undergoing dental treatment, strategies such as modeling, positive reinforcement, biofeedback relaxation, breathing relaxation, animal-assisted therapy, combined tell-show-do, audiovisual distraction, and cognitive behavior therapy showed large reduction in anxiety. For children and adolescents with special health care needs, audiovisual distraction and sensory-adapted dental environment showed large reduction of anxiety. <b>Conclusions:</b> All the formulated recommendations were conditional and were mostly based on very low certainty of evidence. Conditional recommendations imply that different choices or combinations of behavior guidance techniques may be most appropriate for different patients. Clinicians should use techniques consistent with the parent/patient values and preferences. These recommendations are based on the best available evidence to-date and are intended to aid clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"45 5","pages":"385-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To present evidence-based recommendations on nonpharmacological behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. Methods: The work group assessed eight systematic reviews for effectiveness of nonpharmacological behavior guidance techniques in children undergoing preventive care or a dental treatment visit. The key outcomes assessed included cooperative behavior, anxiety, and procedural pain. To formulate the recommendations, the work group used the GRADE framework to obtain consensus on domains such as priority of the problem, certainty of the evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable consequences, patients' values and preferences, acceptability, and feasibility. Results: Overall, the use of basic nonpharmacological behavior guidance techniques resulted in trivial-to-small effect on improvement in behavior or reduction in anxiety. However, for children and adolescents undergoing preventive care, mobile applications and modeling showed large effects in reduction of anxiety. For those undergoing dental treatment, strategies such as modeling, positive reinforcement, biofeedback relaxation, breathing relaxation, animal-assisted therapy, combined tell-show-do, audiovisual distraction, and cognitive behavior therapy showed large reduction in anxiety. For children and adolescents with special health care needs, audiovisual distraction and sensory-adapted dental environment showed large reduction of anxiety. Conclusions: All the formulated recommendations were conditional and were mostly based on very low certainty of evidence. Conditional recommendations imply that different choices or combinations of behavior guidance techniques may be most appropriate for different patients. Clinicians should use techniques consistent with the parent/patient values and preferences. These recommendations are based on the best available evidence to-date and are intended to aid clinical decision making.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童牙科患者的非药物行为指南。
目的:提出儿童牙科患者非药物行为指导的循证建议。方法:该工作组评估了八项非药物行为指导技术在接受预防性护理或牙科治疗的儿童中的有效性的系统评价。评估的主要结果包括合作行为、焦虑和手术疼痛。为了制定建议,工作组使用GRADE框架就问题的优先级、证据的确定性、理想和不理想后果之间的平衡、患者的价值观和偏好、可接受性和可行性等领域达成共识。结果:总体而言,使用基本的非药物行为指导技术对改善行为或减少焦虑的影响微乎其微。然而,对于接受预防性护理的儿童和青少年来说,移动应用程序和建模在减少焦虑方面显示出巨大的效果。对于那些正在接受牙科治疗的人来说,建模、正强化、生物反馈放松、呼吸放松、动物辅助治疗、联合表演、视听分心和认知行为治疗等策略显示焦虑大大减少。对于有特殊医疗保健需求的儿童和青少年,视听干扰和感官适应的牙科环境显示焦虑大大减少。结论:所有制定的建议都是有条件的,大多基于非常低的证据确定性。有条件的建议意味着行为指导技术的不同选择或组合可能最适合不同的患者。临床医生应使用符合父母/患者价值观和偏好的技术。这些建议基于迄今为止可用的最佳证据,旨在帮助临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Analysis of Responses of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Special Needs Dentistry. Adopting The D3 Group's Translational Paradigm for Molar Hypomineralization and Chalky Teeth. Assessment of Oral Hygiene and Gingivitis in Adolescents With and Without Cystic Fibrosis. Association of Parental Divorce With Oral Health in U.S. Children and Adolescents. Comparison of Compressive Strength Between Traditional and Novel Open-Faced Stainless Steel Crowns Filled With Different Restorative Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1