Fortunato Escobar-Mamani, George Argota-Pérez, Víctor Dante Ayaviri Nina, Santotomas Licímaco Aguilar-Pinto, Gabith Miriam Quispe Fernandez, Otto Eulogio Arellano Cepeda
{"title":"Costeo basado en actividades (ABC) en las PYMES e iniciativas innovadoras: ¿opción posible o caduca?","authors":"Fortunato Escobar-Mamani, George Argota-Pérez, Víctor Dante Ayaviri Nina, Santotomas Licímaco Aguilar-Pinto, Gabith Miriam Quispe Fernandez, Otto Eulogio Arellano Cepeda","doi":"10.18271/ria.2021.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quantification of production/service costs to determine the market price is fundamental in offering the maximum value of satisfaction. Therefore, management accounting is essential. One of the alternative tools is activity-based costing, known as ABC system, an alternative method to overcome the limitations of traditional indirect cost systems, which somehow distort the actual accounting of costs. Will exploring its development, applicability, challenges and benefits still be a possible option? This study aimed at reviewing the scientific literature produced on the activity-based costing system in recent years, identifying trends of adoption and challegnes of implementation in various manufacturing and service firms. High impact journals indexed in PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, among others, were analyzed. The results show an increase of publications on the implementation of the ABC system in PubMed (855 publications), WoS (1131) and Scopus (2535). The results show that its applicability remains a possible option as an alternative costing tool for SME managers or owners. This study concludes that the application of the ABC system is adequate to determine real costs and could guarantee more reasonable and competitive prices in the market. However, there is still resistance to its implementation due to human and technological ignorance.","PeriodicalId":41861,"journal":{"name":"Revista Investigaciones Altoandinas-Journal of High Andean Research","volume":"189 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Investigaciones Altoandinas-Journal of High Andean Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18271/ria.2021.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The quantification of production/service costs to determine the market price is fundamental in offering the maximum value of satisfaction. Therefore, management accounting is essential. One of the alternative tools is activity-based costing, known as ABC system, an alternative method to overcome the limitations of traditional indirect cost systems, which somehow distort the actual accounting of costs. Will exploring its development, applicability, challenges and benefits still be a possible option? This study aimed at reviewing the scientific literature produced on the activity-based costing system in recent years, identifying trends of adoption and challegnes of implementation in various manufacturing and service firms. High impact journals indexed in PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, among others, were analyzed. The results show an increase of publications on the implementation of the ABC system in PubMed (855 publications), WoS (1131) and Scopus (2535). The results show that its applicability remains a possible option as an alternative costing tool for SME managers or owners. This study concludes that the application of the ABC system is adequate to determine real costs and could guarantee more reasonable and competitive prices in the market. However, there is still resistance to its implementation due to human and technological ignorance.
量化生产/服务成本以确定市场价格是提供最大满意价值的基础。因此,管理会计是必不可少的。其中一种替代工具是作业成本法,即ABC系统,这是一种克服传统间接成本系统局限性的替代方法,传统间接成本系统在某种程度上扭曲了成本的实际核算。探索它的发展、适用性、挑战和好处仍然是一个可能的选择吗?这项研究的目的是审查近年来关于作业成本计算系统的科学文献,确定各种制造和服务公司采用的趋势和实施的挑战。对PubMed、Web of Science (WoS)、Scopus等收录的高影响力期刊进行了分析。结果表明,在PubMed(855篇)、WoS(1131篇)和Scopus(2535篇)中,关于ABC系统实施的论文数量有所增加。结果表明,它的适用性仍然是一个可能的选择,作为一个替代成本核算工具的中小企业的管理者或业主。本研究的结论是,作业成本法的应用足以确定实际成本,可以保证在市场上更加合理和有竞争力的价格。然而,由于人类和技术的无知,它的实施仍然存在阻力。