The Problem of Intentionality in the Contemporary Visual Arts

Gianluca Lorenzini
{"title":"The Problem of Intentionality in the Contemporary Visual Arts","authors":"Gianluca Lorenzini","doi":"10.33134/EEJA.188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discourse regarding intentionality and interpretation in analytic philosophy of art, although ample and lively, has concerned itself almost exclusively with the literary medium. Starting from a paper published by Hans Maes, I discuss the complications that may arise in straightforwardly applying current intentionalist strategies to the realm of the contemporary visual arts. I first present a detailed account of the difference between hypothetical intentionalism and moderate actual intentionalism which will help to better understand the nature of Maes’s arguments in his paper. I then argue that the characteristics which shape the approach of moderate actual intentionalism cannot be accommodated by certain contemporary visual artworks. I will demonstrate how in certain contemporary artworks, should a viewer be interested in accepting actual intentions within her interpretation, she will have to do so with an extreme intentionalist posture rather than a moderate actual one.","PeriodicalId":53570,"journal":{"name":"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics","volume":"78 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33134/EEJA.188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The discourse regarding intentionality and interpretation in analytic philosophy of art, although ample and lively, has concerned itself almost exclusively with the literary medium. Starting from a paper published by Hans Maes, I discuss the complications that may arise in straightforwardly applying current intentionalist strategies to the realm of the contemporary visual arts. I first present a detailed account of the difference between hypothetical intentionalism and moderate actual intentionalism which will help to better understand the nature of Maes’s arguments in his paper. I then argue that the characteristics which shape the approach of moderate actual intentionalism cannot be accommodated by certain contemporary visual artworks. I will demonstrate how in certain contemporary artworks, should a viewer be interested in accepting actual intentions within her interpretation, she will have to do so with an extreme intentionalist posture rather than a moderate actual one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代视觉艺术中的意向性问题
艺术分析哲学中关于意向性和阐释的论述,虽然丰富而生动,但几乎完全与文学媒介有关。从Hans Maes发表的一篇论文开始,我讨论了当将当前的意向主义策略直接应用于当代视觉艺术领域时可能出现的复杂性。我首先对假设的意图主义和适度的实际意图主义之间的区别进行了详细的描述,这将有助于更好地理解梅斯在他的论文中论证的本质。然后,我认为塑造温和的实际意图主义方法的特征不能被某些当代视觉艺术所容纳。我将展示在某些当代艺术作品中,如果观众有兴趣在她的解释中接受真实的意图,她将不得不以一种极端的意图主义姿态而不是一种温和的实际姿态来这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics
Estetika : The Central European Journal of Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Emilia Dilke on Aesthetics Aesthetic Engagement and Soundscape: A Case of Convenience Store Woman, a Contemporary Japanese Novel Looking through Images: A Phenomenology of Visual Media by Emmanuel Alloa The Implied Designer of Digital Games Contemporary Art and the Problem of Indiscernibles: An Adverbialist Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1