Sloppy Tags and Metacrap? Quality of User Contributed Tags in Collaborative Social Tagging Systems

Hongwei Zhu, Harris Wu
{"title":"Sloppy Tags and Metacrap? Quality of User Contributed Tags in Collaborative Social Tagging Systems","authors":"Hongwei Zhu, Harris Wu","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1556722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been an increasing number of social tagging systems on the web that allow users to contribute tags collaboratively to describe various resources. As the number of tags continue to grow, it is important that we can describe and measure their quality. There have been conflicting opinions about the quality of user-contributed tags but the issue has not been systematically studied. In this work-in-progress paper, we propose a preliminary methodology for assessing tag quality. The methodology identifies three aspects of tag quality in a social tagging system: individual tags, collections of tags, and the association of the tags with the corresponding resources. The proposed methodology is being empirically evaluated using the tags of several social tagging systems. In addition to validating and refining the tag quality assessment methodology, the empirical analysis is expected to provide new findings about various properties of the tags. These findings will be used to improve the design of tagging systems by incorporating mechanisms that induce the contribution of high quality tags.","PeriodicalId":93486,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... Americas Conference on Information Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... Americas Conference on Information Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1556722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There have been an increasing number of social tagging systems on the web that allow users to contribute tags collaboratively to describe various resources. As the number of tags continue to grow, it is important that we can describe and measure their quality. There have been conflicting opinions about the quality of user-contributed tags but the issue has not been systematically studied. In this work-in-progress paper, we propose a preliminary methodology for assessing tag quality. The methodology identifies three aspects of tag quality in a social tagging system: individual tags, collections of tags, and the association of the tags with the corresponding resources. The proposed methodology is being empirically evaluated using the tags of several social tagging systems. In addition to validating and refining the tag quality assessment methodology, the empirical analysis is expected to provide new findings about various properties of the tags. These findings will be used to improve the design of tagging systems by incorporating mechanisms that induce the contribution of high quality tags.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邋遢标签和Metacrap?协同社会标签系统中用户贡献标签的质量
网络上有越来越多的社会标签系统,允许用户协作贡献标签来描述各种资源。随着标签数量的不断增长,我们能够描述和衡量它们的质量是很重要的。关于用户贡献标签的质量,一直存在着相互矛盾的观点,但这一问题尚未得到系统的研究。在这篇正在进行的论文中,我们提出了一种评估标签质量的初步方法。该方法确定了社会标签系统中标签质量的三个方面:单个标签、标签集合以及标签与相应资源的关联。所提出的方法正在使用几个社会标签系统的标签进行经验评估。除了验证和完善标签质量评估方法外,实证分析有望提供有关标签各种属性的新发现。这些发现将被用来改进标签系统的设计,通过纳入机制,诱导高质量标签的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Do Firms Have Information Systems? Do Novice and Expert Users of Clinical Decision Support Tools Need Different Explanations? Unlocking the Smart Home: An Examination of Factors Influencing Smart Lock Adoption Intention Please Share! Online Word of Mouth and Charitable Crowdfunding Fad-like Technology Adoption as a Social Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1