Online microlearning and student engagement in computer games higher education

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Learning Technology Pub Date : 2022-03-09 DOI:10.25304/rlt.v30.2680
Connor McKee, Konstantinos Ntokos
{"title":"Online microlearning and student engagement in computer games higher education","authors":"Connor McKee, Konstantinos Ntokos","doi":"10.25304/rlt.v30.2680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microlearning, in which lecture recordings are segmented into parts, saw renewed focus as a means of maintaining student engagement amid the challenging conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. While many institutions shifted to remote provision with segmented lecture recordings, there is a lack of consensus about the length that these segments should be in order to best maintain engagement. Using a self-reported system of Likert-based diagnostics, 135 videos in use at Solent University’s computer games area were analysed. Ninety-four students were asked to agree or disagree with statements in the format ‘I understand X’, each tailored to the subject material of the video in question. Repeated questions before and after the video allowed for a change in confidence to be measured, as an indicator of engagement. The resulting 4198 responses showed an optimum range of 5–8 min overall. However, the year of study emerged as a significant factor in this regard – with an optimum range for first years at 6–12 min, and for second and third years at under 8 min. There is a need for institutional-level change in this area, as many institutions currently recommend use of lecture video segments far longer than either figure.","PeriodicalId":46691,"journal":{"name":"Research in Learning Technology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Learning Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Microlearning, in which lecture recordings are segmented into parts, saw renewed focus as a means of maintaining student engagement amid the challenging conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. While many institutions shifted to remote provision with segmented lecture recordings, there is a lack of consensus about the length that these segments should be in order to best maintain engagement. Using a self-reported system of Likert-based diagnostics, 135 videos in use at Solent University’s computer games area were analysed. Ninety-four students were asked to agree or disagree with statements in the format ‘I understand X’, each tailored to the subject material of the video in question. Repeated questions before and after the video allowed for a change in confidence to be measured, as an indicator of engagement. The resulting 4198 responses showed an optimum range of 5–8 min overall. However, the year of study emerged as a significant factor in this regard – with an optimum range for first years at 6–12 min, and for second and third years at under 8 min. There is a need for institutional-level change in this area, as many institutions currently recommend use of lecture video segments far longer than either figure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络微学习与学生参与电脑游戏高等教育
微学习将讲课录音分成几个部分,在2019冠状病毒病大流行的挑战性条件下,微学习再次成为保持学生参与度的一种手段。虽然许多机构转向远程提供分段讲座录音,但为了最好地保持参与,这些片段的长度应该缺乏共识。使用基于李克特诊断的自我报告系统,分析了索伦特大学电脑游戏区使用的135个视频。94名学生被要求同意或不同意“我理解X”格式的陈述,每个陈述都根据所讨论的视频的主题材料量身定制。在视频播放前后反复提出问题,可以测量信心的变化,作为参与度的指标。结果显示,4198个反应的最佳范围为5-8分钟。然而,在这方面,学习年份成为一个重要因素——第一年的最佳范围是6-12分钟,第二年和第三年的最佳范围是8分钟以下。在这一领域,需要在机构层面进行变革,因为许多机构目前建议使用比这两个数字都长得多的讲座视频片段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Learning Technology
Research in Learning Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Research in Learning Technology: making friends and influencing people The construction of gamer identity in narratives about video game playing and formal education learning experiences The outlook of learning through metaverse technology from the perspective of teachers in the science education Social annotation: what are students’ perceptions and how does social annotation relate to grades? A theoretical framework for digital learning spaces: learning in individual spaces, working groups, communities of interest, and open connections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1