Medical laboratory professional's perceptions of continuous medical education

A. Alyaemni, Samer Qassam
{"title":"Medical laboratory professional's perceptions of continuous medical education","authors":"A. Alyaemni, Samer Qassam","doi":"10.4103/JHS.JHS_61_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical laboratory technologists (MLTs) are required to gain credit for continuous professional development for relicensing as well as for their own career-long learning. International studies have shown that MLTs who undertake continuing medical education (CME) have improved productivity, enhanced professional flexibility and high work fulfilment. The time spent on CME is associated with professional competency. Previous national research has shown that attendance at CME programmes in Saudi Arabia is likely affected by demographic factors. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of MLTs towards CME activities and to predict factors that affect attendance. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was given to 103 medical laboratory professionals from the Security Forces Hospital as part of a cross-sectional descriptive study. Data were analysed using SPSS version 21. Results: The overall mean score was 3.88 for the 103 questionnaires, indicating an affirmative perception of the CME programmes. Males in the age group 25-34 years accounted for 61.2% of responses. The preferred delivery modes for CME programmes were short courses and workshops (23%) and higher education relevant courses (20%). For those who had attended CME and those who had not, no significant difference was found in gender, age, field of specialty, education categories or working experience. Conclusion: Most laboratory technicians in our study reported favourable perceptions of CME programmes, feeling that they increased professional confidence and competency. We recommend that core competencies be integrated into credentialing using profession-specific CME in a workplace setting. In addition, MLTs should be involved in designing the programmes as well. Further studies in a multicentre institution are needed to analyse the difference in perception among those who have attended CME and those who have not.","PeriodicalId":31033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Specialties","volume":"29 1","pages":"80 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JHS.JHS_61_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical laboratory technologists (MLTs) are required to gain credit for continuous professional development for relicensing as well as for their own career-long learning. International studies have shown that MLTs who undertake continuing medical education (CME) have improved productivity, enhanced professional flexibility and high work fulfilment. The time spent on CME is associated with professional competency. Previous national research has shown that attendance at CME programmes in Saudi Arabia is likely affected by demographic factors. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of MLTs towards CME activities and to predict factors that affect attendance. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was given to 103 medical laboratory professionals from the Security Forces Hospital as part of a cross-sectional descriptive study. Data were analysed using SPSS version 21. Results: The overall mean score was 3.88 for the 103 questionnaires, indicating an affirmative perception of the CME programmes. Males in the age group 25-34 years accounted for 61.2% of responses. The preferred delivery modes for CME programmes were short courses and workshops (23%) and higher education relevant courses (20%). For those who had attended CME and those who had not, no significant difference was found in gender, age, field of specialty, education categories or working experience. Conclusion: Most laboratory technicians in our study reported favourable perceptions of CME programmes, feeling that they increased professional confidence and competency. We recommend that core competencies be integrated into credentialing using profession-specific CME in a workplace setting. In addition, MLTs should be involved in designing the programmes as well. Further studies in a multicentre institution are needed to analyse the difference in perception among those who have attended CME and those who have not.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学检验专业人员对继续医学教育的认知
背景:医学化验师(mlt)需要获得持续专业发展的学分,以重新获得执照,以及他们自己的职业学习。国际研究表明,接受继续医学教育(CME)的mlt提高了生产力,增强了专业灵活性和高工作成就感。在CME上花费的时间与专业能力有关。先前的全国性研究表明,沙特阿拉伯参加CME项目的人数可能受到人口因素的影响。本研究的目的是探讨mlt对CME活动的看法,并预测影响出勤率的因素。方法:对来自安全部队医院的103名医学实验室专业人员进行问卷调查,作为横断面描述性研究的一部分。数据分析采用SPSS 21版。结果:103份问卷的总体平均得分为3.88分,表明对CME课程有肯定的看法。25-34岁男性占61.2%。继续教育课程的首选交付模式是短期课程和讲习班(23%)和高等教育相关课程(20%)。参加过继续医学教育和没有参加继续医学教育的人在性别、年龄、专业领域、教育类别和工作经验方面没有显著差异。结论:在我们的研究中,大多数实验室技术人员报告了对CME计划的好感,感觉他们增加了专业信心和能力。我们建议在工作场所使用专业特定的CME将核心能力整合到认证中。此外,mlt也应参与方案的设计。需要在多中心机构进行进一步的研究,以分析参加过CME和没有参加过CME的人在认知上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Co-Morbidities in psoriatic versus non-psoriatic patients Stability testing of extemporaneous preparation of methyl salicylate ointment An investigation of the saudi healthcare system's readiness for change in the light of vision 2030: The role of transformational leadership style Attitudes and perceptions towards organ donation in Riyadh A rare case of suicide attempt by subcutaneous self-injection of kerosene: A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1