Deficits in working memory visual-phonological binding in children with dyslexia.

Q3 Psychology Psychology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1037/PNE0000066
Donatella Albano, R. B. Garcia, C. Cornoldi
{"title":"Deficits in working memory visual-phonological binding in children with dyslexia.","authors":"Donatella Albano, R. B. Garcia, C. Cornoldi","doi":"10.1037/PNE0000066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning to read involves cross-modal binding processes, that is, the association between visual and phonological information in the mapping of written forms (graphemes) to phonological codes. The present study examined visual-phonological binding in a memory binding task, comparing a group of children with dyslexia with a control group of typical readers, matched for age, grade, and sex. Children were required to memorize the association between 8 shapes and nonwords presented in association for 4 times, placed either in fixed or variable spatial locations across trials. The results showed that children with dyslexia have deficits in cross-modal memory binding and are not able to use spatial location as an effective cue to bind information, as it was observed for control children. In addition, children with dyslexia made more phonological errors and binding errors than the control group. A purely phonological deficit in dyslexia does not explain the overall pattern of results, and dyslexia may involve deficits in 1 or more types of processes, including the capacity to bind visual to phonological information. Thus, assessment of binding processes may have implications both for diagnosis and treatment.","PeriodicalId":39094,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Neuroscience","volume":"33 1","pages":"411-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/PNE0000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Learning to read involves cross-modal binding processes, that is, the association between visual and phonological information in the mapping of written forms (graphemes) to phonological codes. The present study examined visual-phonological binding in a memory binding task, comparing a group of children with dyslexia with a control group of typical readers, matched for age, grade, and sex. Children were required to memorize the association between 8 shapes and nonwords presented in association for 4 times, placed either in fixed or variable spatial locations across trials. The results showed that children with dyslexia have deficits in cross-modal memory binding and are not able to use spatial location as an effective cue to bind information, as it was observed for control children. In addition, children with dyslexia made more phonological errors and binding errors than the control group. A purely phonological deficit in dyslexia does not explain the overall pattern of results, and dyslexia may involve deficits in 1 or more types of processes, including the capacity to bind visual to phonological information. Thus, assessment of binding processes may have implications both for diagnosis and treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读障碍儿童工作记忆的视觉-语音结合缺陷。
学习阅读涉及到跨模态结合过程,也就是说,在书写形式(字素)到语音代码的映射中,视觉和语音信息之间的联系。本研究考察了记忆结合任务中的视觉-语音结合,将一组有阅读障碍的儿童与一组年龄、年级和性别相匹配的正常读者进行比较。孩子们被要求记住8个形状和非单词之间的关联,这些非单词被放置在固定或可变的空间位置上,共4次。结果表明,阅读障碍儿童在跨模态记忆结合方面存在缺陷,不能像正常儿童那样使用空间位置作为有效的线索来结合信息。此外,与对照组相比,阅读障碍儿童出现了更多的语音错误和结合错误。阅读障碍中单纯的语音缺陷并不能解释结果的整体模式,阅读障碍可能涉及一种或多种过程的缺陷,包括将视觉信息与语音信息联系起来的能力。因此,结合过程的评估可能对诊断和治疗都有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology and Neuroscience
Psychology and Neuroscience Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychology & Neuroscience publishes articles encompassing all intersection areas between psychology and neurosciences. The journal is organized into five thematic sections: Psychophysics and PerceptionBehavior/Systems/CognitionPlasticity and Neural DevelopmentClinical and Experimental NeuropsychologyNeuropsychopharmacology
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Effects of Sex on the Attentional Orientation Bias Toward Emotional Expressions in Children: An Eye-Tracking Study An examination of the Amsterdam Executive Function Inventory (AEFI) in South Africa: A factor analytic study. Neural correlates of cognitive reserve based on EEG signals: A systematic review. Effects of sex on the attentional orientation bias toward emotional expressions in children: An eye-tracking study. Evaluation of gaze-to-object mapping algorithms for use in “real-world” translatable neuropsychological paradigms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1