Computer-assisted surgery does not improve the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty for severe genu varus deformity

Fu-Chun Chang, Shih-Jie Lin, Tsan-Wen Huang, Mel S. Lee, R. Hsu
{"title":"Computer-assisted surgery does not improve the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty for severe genu varus deformity","authors":"Fu-Chun Chang, Shih-Jie Lin, Tsan-Wen Huang, Mel S. Lee, R. Hsu","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.20151124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Accurate femoral rotational alignment is critical for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Debates exist about whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) improves the accuracy of femoral rotational alignment. We hypothesize that it is related to the severity of the preoperative genu varus deformity and that CAS-TKA is beneficial under certain circumstances. Methods: Patients who had osteoarthritis with genu varus deformity and underwent conventional TKA or CAS-TKA between January 2007 and July 2013 at our hospital were enrolled. Based on the degree of preoperative deviation from the mechanical axis (MA), the patients were divided into three subgroups at 5-degree intervals: (1) varus deformity of < 10 degrees, (2) 10–14.9 degrees, and (3) ≥ 15 degrees. Computed tomography was used to determine whether CAS-TKA provided better femoral rotational alignment than did conventional TKA. Component and limb alignment were also radiographically compared. Results: One hundred seventy-three knees on 128 patients met the inclusion criteria. For patients in the < 10 degrees and 10–14.9 degrees groups, the component alignments and postoperative mechanical axes were not significantly different between conventional and CSA-TKA. For patients in the ≥ 15 degrees group, however, the femoral flexion angle was significantly (p < 0.001) better for CSA-TKA, but not for the femoral valgus, tibial valgus, tibial flexion, or femoral rotational angles. Conclusions: CAS-TKA does not improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the femoral component in patients with genu varus deformity. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"115 1","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.20151124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Accurate femoral rotational alignment is critical for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Debates exist about whether computer-assisted surgery-TKA (CAS-TKA) improves the accuracy of femoral rotational alignment. We hypothesize that it is related to the severity of the preoperative genu varus deformity and that CAS-TKA is beneficial under certain circumstances. Methods: Patients who had osteoarthritis with genu varus deformity and underwent conventional TKA or CAS-TKA between January 2007 and July 2013 at our hospital were enrolled. Based on the degree of preoperative deviation from the mechanical axis (MA), the patients were divided into three subgroups at 5-degree intervals: (1) varus deformity of < 10 degrees, (2) 10–14.9 degrees, and (3) ≥ 15 degrees. Computed tomography was used to determine whether CAS-TKA provided better femoral rotational alignment than did conventional TKA. Component and limb alignment were also radiographically compared. Results: One hundred seventy-three knees on 128 patients met the inclusion criteria. For patients in the < 10 degrees and 10–14.9 degrees groups, the component alignments and postoperative mechanical axes were not significantly different between conventional and CSA-TKA. For patients in the ≥ 15 degrees group, however, the femoral flexion angle was significantly (p < 0.001) better for CSA-TKA, but not for the femoral valgus, tibial valgus, tibial flexion, or femoral rotational angles. Conclusions: CAS-TKA does not improve the accuracy of rotational alignment of the femoral component in patients with genu varus deformity. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机辅助手术不能改善严重膝内翻畸形全膝关节置换术中股骨假体的旋转对齐
背景:准确的股骨旋转对齐是成功的全膝关节置换术(TKA)的关键。关于计算机辅助手术- tka (CAS-TKA)是否能提高股骨旋转对准的准确性存在争议。我们假设这与术前膝内翻畸形的严重程度有关,并且在某些情况下CAS-TKA是有益的。方法:选取2007年1月至2013年7月在我院行常规TKA或CAS-TKA治疗的膝内翻畸形骨性关节炎患者。根据术前与机械轴偏离程度(MA),以5度为间隔将患者分为3个亚组:(1)内翻畸形< 10度,(2)10 - 14.9度,(3)≥15度。计算机断层扫描用于确定CAS-TKA是否比传统TKA提供更好的股骨旋转对准。影像学上也比较了组件和肢体对齐。结果:128例患者173个膝关节符合纳入标准。对于< 10度组和10 - 14.9度组患者,常规组和CSA-TKA组的组件对齐和术后机械轴无显著差异。然而,对于≥15度组的患者,CSA-TKA的股骨屈曲角明显(p < 0.001)更好,但对股骨外翻、胫骨外翻、胫骨屈曲或股骨旋转角没有影响。结论:CAS-TKA不能提高膝内翻畸形患者股骨假体旋转对准的准确性。证据等级:治疗性III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous bilateral femoral neck subcapital fractures in bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A case report and review of the literature Reconstruction of lumbosacral defect with pedicled superior gluteal artery perforator flap: A case report and literature review Combined injection of hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma for alleviating chronic pain and improving range of motion in post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis over a short term Concomitant percutaneous vertebroplasty and sacroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and sacral insufficiency fracture: A case report and literature review High prevalence of female osteoporosis and male osteopenia in patients aged more than 55 years old with upper limb fracture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1