Minimal participant structure of the event and the emergence of the argument/adjunct distinction

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Studies in Language Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1075/sl.22029.fra
Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Natalia Gurian, S. Karpenko
{"title":"Minimal participant structure of the event and the emergence of the argument/adjunct distinction","authors":"Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Natalia Gurian, S. Karpenko","doi":"10.1075/sl.22029.fra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe present study answers the following questions: why the semantic roles of agent or patient are often unmarked; why other semantic roles, such as benefactive, stative locative, goal, or source, are unmarked when used with some verbs and marked when used with other verbs; and why semantic relations such as ‘associative’, ‘instrumental’, ‘reason’, ‘purpose’, and others often referred to as ‘adjuncts’ are usually marked. The study, based on Sino-Russian idiolects spoken in the Far East of Russia, proposes that at an early stage in the formation of grammatical systems by adult speakers, if a noun phrase fulfills the role of one of the participants in the minimal participant structure of the event, the semantic role of the noun phrase is not marked. If the noun phrase does not fulfill the role of one of the participants in the minimal participant-structure of the event, the role of the noun phrase must be marked.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":"257 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.22029.fra","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study answers the following questions: why the semantic roles of agent or patient are often unmarked; why other semantic roles, such as benefactive, stative locative, goal, or source, are unmarked when used with some verbs and marked when used with other verbs; and why semantic relations such as ‘associative’, ‘instrumental’, ‘reason’, ‘purpose’, and others often referred to as ‘adjuncts’ are usually marked. The study, based on Sino-Russian idiolects spoken in the Far East of Russia, proposes that at an early stage in the formation of grammatical systems by adult speakers, if a noun phrase fulfills the role of one of the participants in the minimal participant structure of the event, the semantic role of the noun phrase is not marked. If the noun phrase does not fulfill the role of one of the participants in the minimal participant-structure of the event, the role of the noun phrase must be marked.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最小参与者结构的事件和出现的论点/附言的区别
本研究回答了以下问题:为什么施者或受者的语义角色经常不被标记;为什么其他语义角色,如施恩、静态、位置、目标或来源,在与某些动词连用时没有标记,而与其他动词连用时则有标记;以及为什么诸如“联想”、“工具性”、“理性”、“目的”以及其他通常被称为“辅助词”的语义关系通常被标记。本研究以俄罗斯远东地区的中俄方言为研究对象,提出在成年说话人形成语法系统的早期阶段,如果名词短语在事件的最小参与者结构中扮演了参与者之一的角色,那么名词短语的语义角色就没有被标记出来。如果名词短语没有在事件的最小参与者结构中扮演参与者的角色,则必须标记名词短语的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.
期刊最新文献
‘Until’ constructions and expletive negation in Huasteca Nahuatl On the link between grammaticalization and subjectification The paradigmaticity of evidentials in the Tibetic languages of Khams Evidentiality, discourse prominence and grammaticalization Speaking about knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1