Computerised dynamic posturography in women with knee osteoarthritis

IF 0.5 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES European Journal of Human Movement Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21134/eurjhm.2022.48.10
Hyoungjin Park Park
{"title":"Computerised dynamic posturography in women with knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Hyoungjin Park Park","doi":"10.21134/eurjhm.2022.48.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare the postural control of women with knee OA and healthy women peers and to determine the effect of knee OA on postural control. Thirty-two individuals, sixteen women with knee osteoarthritis(52.12±10.69)and sixteen healthy women(51.00±10.00)who were same age (±3yr), were evaluated on postural control as measured by a NeuroCom EquiTest. Outcomes included equilibrium scores, sensory analysis ratios, sway energy score, and latenciesfrom sensory organisationtest, motor control test, and adaptation testandwere examined using the independent t-test.Equilibrium scores (in condition 1: p=0.030, condition 3: p=0.019, condition 4: p=0.045, condition 5: p=0.010, condition 6: p=0.041, and Composite value: p=0.011), strategy score (Strategy 5: p= 0.015), sensory analysis ratios (vestibularratio: p=0.013 and managementratio: p=0.023), and latencies (largeforward: p=0.020 and comprehensivelatency: p=0.016) were significantly better in the healthy women group. The presence of knee OA had an impact on the sensory system's effectiveness and its utilization in postural control. Lower values of equilibrium scores, strategy scores, sensory analysis ratios for women knee OA group were evidence of larger displacements of the center of gravity in the forward–backward direction suggesting that women knee OA group was unable to maintain balance compared to healthy knee controls. Also, women with knee OA displayed a longer neuromuscular response latency to balance perturbations, indicating a reduced ability to begin in recover balance quickly following an unexpected disturbance. This observation should be taken into account in the fall prevention, especially, individuals should place in dynamic situations with conflicted sensory environment, as these are found in daily life.","PeriodicalId":36150,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Movement","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2022.48.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the postural control of women with knee OA and healthy women peers and to determine the effect of knee OA on postural control. Thirty-two individuals, sixteen women with knee osteoarthritis(52.12±10.69)and sixteen healthy women(51.00±10.00)who were same age (±3yr), were evaluated on postural control as measured by a NeuroCom EquiTest. Outcomes included equilibrium scores, sensory analysis ratios, sway energy score, and latenciesfrom sensory organisationtest, motor control test, and adaptation testandwere examined using the independent t-test.Equilibrium scores (in condition 1: p=0.030, condition 3: p=0.019, condition 4: p=0.045, condition 5: p=0.010, condition 6: p=0.041, and Composite value: p=0.011), strategy score (Strategy 5: p= 0.015), sensory analysis ratios (vestibularratio: p=0.013 and managementratio: p=0.023), and latencies (largeforward: p=0.020 and comprehensivelatency: p=0.016) were significantly better in the healthy women group. The presence of knee OA had an impact on the sensory system's effectiveness and its utilization in postural control. Lower values of equilibrium scores, strategy scores, sensory analysis ratios for women knee OA group were evidence of larger displacements of the center of gravity in the forward–backward direction suggesting that women knee OA group was unable to maintain balance compared to healthy knee controls. Also, women with knee OA displayed a longer neuromuscular response latency to balance perturbations, indicating a reduced ability to begin in recover balance quickly following an unexpected disturbance. This observation should be taken into account in the fall prevention, especially, individuals should place in dynamic situations with conflicted sensory environment, as these are found in daily life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝骨关节炎女性患者的计算机动态体位照相
本研究的目的是比较患有膝关节OA的女性和健康女性的姿势控制,并确定膝关节OA对姿势控制的影响。采用NeuroCom EquiTest对32例相同年龄(±3岁)的膝关节骨性关节炎患者16例(52.12±10.69)和健康女性16例(51.00±10.00)进行姿势控制评价。结果包括平衡得分、感觉分析比率、摇摆能量得分和感觉组织测试、运动控制测试和适应测试的潜伏期,并使用独立t检验进行检验。平衡得分(条件1:p=0.030,条件3:p=0.019,条件4:p=0.045,条件5:p=0.010,条件6:p=0.041,综合值p=0.011)、策略得分(策略5:p= 0.015)、感觉分析比(前庭比:p=0.013,管理比:p=0.023)、潜伏期(大前向:p=0.020,综合潜伏期:p=0.016)均显著优于健康女性组。膝关节骨性关节炎的存在影响了感觉系统的有效性及其在姿势控制中的应用。女性膝关节OA组的平衡评分、策略评分和感觉分析比值较低,表明女性膝关节OA组的重心在前后方向上的位移较大,这表明与健康膝关节对照组相比,女性膝关节OA组无法保持平衡。此外,患有膝关节OA的女性对平衡干扰的神经肌肉反应潜伏期较长,表明在意外干扰后迅速恢复平衡的能力降低。在预防跌倒时应考虑到这一观察结果,特别是,个体应置于具有冲突感官环境的动态环境中,因为这些在日常生活中都可以发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Movement
European Journal of Human Movement Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of a Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching System Using a Low-Speed, High-Torque Motor Women can transfer their ability to cope with stress from sport to academic contexts Technical And Internal Load Responses in 3-A-Side Full-Court Basketball Games: The Effects of Coaches' Verbal Feedback The tense or constricted mind Comparison of Physical And Physiological Profiles Between Elite Freestyle Men And Women Wrestlers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1