Approach to Assessing the Digital Economy Development Based on Clustering of Russian Regions

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Ekonomika Regiona-Economy of Region Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-4-8
T. Afanasieva, A. Kazanbieva
{"title":"Approach to Assessing the Digital Economy Development Based on Clustering of Russian Regions","authors":"T. Afanasieva, A. Kazanbieva","doi":"10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article proposes and tests a new approach to the assessment of the digital economy development in order to obtain evaluative knowledge (qualitative assessments) from quantitative indicators of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The distinctive features of the proposed approach are the integration of cluster analysis and qualitative assessment, as well as the use of elements of the fuzzy set theory for modelling evaluative knowledge and presenting it in linguistic form at three levels of interpretation. Three methods (K-means, BIRCH, DBSCAN), differing in terms of grouping principles, were applied to improve the quality of clustering. The most suitable method for clustering the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was automatically selected based on a proven quality metric. The developed automated methodology for qualitative assessment of digital economy was tested on 15 indicators observed over 9 years, presented on the website of the Federal State Statistics Service for 83 regions of the Russian Federation. The study identified six clusters, for which three classes of qualitative assessments were determined, characterising the problems of digital economy development by indicators, their groups and year based on the aggregation of linguistic assessments. Thus, the level of the indicator (Low, Medium, High), as well as belonging to the problem according to the group of indicators (Problem/No problem) and according to all indicators (Developed/Developing) were estimated for each region in the clusters. Analysis of qualitative estimates obtained from various regional numerical indicators showed that the most «problematic» in 2010 and in 2018 was the group of indicators «Science and Innovation». Additionally, the group of indicators «Economic Efficiency» demonstrated a negative trend in the period 2010-2018, while a positive trend was observed in the group of indicators «Information Society» and «Labour Market».","PeriodicalId":51978,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika Regiona-Economy of Region","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika Regiona-Economy of Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present article proposes and tests a new approach to the assessment of the digital economy development in order to obtain evaluative knowledge (qualitative assessments) from quantitative indicators of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The distinctive features of the proposed approach are the integration of cluster analysis and qualitative assessment, as well as the use of elements of the fuzzy set theory for modelling evaluative knowledge and presenting it in linguistic form at three levels of interpretation. Three methods (K-means, BIRCH, DBSCAN), differing in terms of grouping principles, were applied to improve the quality of clustering. The most suitable method for clustering the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was automatically selected based on a proven quality metric. The developed automated methodology for qualitative assessment of digital economy was tested on 15 indicators observed over 9 years, presented on the website of the Federal State Statistics Service for 83 regions of the Russian Federation. The study identified six clusters, for which three classes of qualitative assessments were determined, characterising the problems of digital economy development by indicators, their groups and year based on the aggregation of linguistic assessments. Thus, the level of the indicator (Low, Medium, High), as well as belonging to the problem according to the group of indicators (Problem/No problem) and according to all indicators (Developed/Developing) were estimated for each region in the clusters. Analysis of qualitative estimates obtained from various regional numerical indicators showed that the most «problematic» in 2010 and in 2018 was the group of indicators «Science and Innovation». Additionally, the group of indicators «Economic Efficiency» demonstrated a negative trend in the period 2010-2018, while a positive trend was observed in the group of indicators «Information Society» and «Labour Market».
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于俄罗斯地区聚类的数字经济发展评估方法
本文提出并测试了一种评估数字经济发展的新方法,以便从俄罗斯联邦组成实体的定量指标中获得评价性知识(定性评估)。所提出的方法的显著特点是整合了聚类分析和定性评估,以及使用模糊集合理论的元素来建模评价知识,并在三个层次的解释中以语言形式呈现。三种方法(K-means, BIRCH, DBSCAN),不同的分组原则,被用于提高聚类的质量。将俄罗斯联邦组成实体聚类的最合适方法是根据经过验证的质量度量标准自动选择的。开发的自动数字经济定性评估方法在9年内观察到的15个指标上进行了测试,这些指标在俄罗斯联邦83个地区的联邦国家统计局网站上公布。该研究确定了六个集群,并确定了三类定性评估,根据语言评估的汇总,通过指标、群体和年份来描述数字经济发展的问题。因此,根据指标组(有问题/没有问题)和所有指标(发达/发展中)对集群中每个区域的指标水平(低、中、高)以及属于问题的程度进行了估计。从各种区域数字指标中获得的定性估计分析表明,2010年和2018年最“有问题”的是“科学与创新”指标组。此外,“经济效率”指标组在2010-2018年期间呈现出负面趋势,而“信息社会”和“劳动力市场”指标组则呈现出积极趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Regional Economic Conditions on Place Branding Results: The Survival Analysis Approach Sustainable Rural Development: A New Perspective on the Assessment in the Context of Spatial Localisation Assessment of the Consistency of Regional and Municipal Strategic Planning Documents Stakeholder Approach to the Regional Sustainable Development: Empirical Study Creative Reindustrialisation of the Second-Tier Cities in the Digital Transformation Era: A Study Using SciVal Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1