The search for commercial sweet white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) adaptive to Ethiopian growing condition seems not successful: what should be done?

L. Yeheyis, Wondimeneh Mekonnen, M. Nelson, David Mcnaughton, Alemu Tarekegn, Zelalem Yadelew, H. Sanders
{"title":"The search for commercial sweet white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) adaptive to Ethiopian growing condition seems not successful: what should be done?","authors":"L. Yeheyis, Wondimeneh Mekonnen, M. Nelson, David Mcnaughton, Alemu Tarekegn, Zelalem Yadelew, H. Sanders","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4196861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study was conducted to find new adaptive commercial sweet white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) varieties and evaluate the effect of inoculum on herbage and seed yields of white and blue lupin varieties in Ethiopia for two growing seasons in two locations. For the experiment a factorial arrangement (seven variety * two inoculation) in a randomized complete block design with three replication was used. Three sweet blue (Bora, Sanabor and Vitabor), three sweet white (Dieta, Energy and Feodora) and one bitter white local landrace lupin varieties were tested in the experiment. Analysis of variance was done using the general linear model procedure in SAS. The effects of location and inoculum were insignificant (P ≥ 0.0761) on yield and yield parameters. The effect of variety was observed (P ≤ 0.035) only on plant height, fresh biomass yield and thousand seed weight in both seasons except for fresh biomass yield in season two. However, its effect on other parameters was not shown (P ≥ 0.134) in both growing seasons or only shown in either season. The mean dry matter yield of all varieties was 2.45 ton per ha. However, sweet blue entries performed better than white entries. The mean seed yield of blue sweet lupin entries and white local check was 2.6 ton per ha. Sweet blue and white local landrace varieties were found tolerant while, commercial sweet white lupin varieties were susceptible for anthracnose and fusarium diseases that occurred immediately after flowering. As a result imported commercial sweet white varieties failed to give seed yield. Developing adaptive, disease resistant and high yielding sweet white lupin through crossing the local and commercial varieties and looking for species specific inoculum should be the future research agendas.","PeriodicalId":23894,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C","volume":"16 1","pages":"317 - 325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4196861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The study was conducted to find new adaptive commercial sweet white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) varieties and evaluate the effect of inoculum on herbage and seed yields of white and blue lupin varieties in Ethiopia for two growing seasons in two locations. For the experiment a factorial arrangement (seven variety * two inoculation) in a randomized complete block design with three replication was used. Three sweet blue (Bora, Sanabor and Vitabor), three sweet white (Dieta, Energy and Feodora) and one bitter white local landrace lupin varieties were tested in the experiment. Analysis of variance was done using the general linear model procedure in SAS. The effects of location and inoculum were insignificant (P ≥ 0.0761) on yield and yield parameters. The effect of variety was observed (P ≤ 0.035) only on plant height, fresh biomass yield and thousand seed weight in both seasons except for fresh biomass yield in season two. However, its effect on other parameters was not shown (P ≥ 0.134) in both growing seasons or only shown in either season. The mean dry matter yield of all varieties was 2.45 ton per ha. However, sweet blue entries performed better than white entries. The mean seed yield of blue sweet lupin entries and white local check was 2.6 ton per ha. Sweet blue and white local landrace varieties were found tolerant while, commercial sweet white lupin varieties were susceptible for anthracnose and fusarium diseases that occurred immediately after flowering. As a result imported commercial sweet white varieties failed to give seed yield. Developing adaptive, disease resistant and high yielding sweet white lupin through crossing the local and commercial varieties and looking for species specific inoculum should be the future research agendas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找适合埃塞俄比亚生长条件的商业甜白罗苹(Lupinus albus L.)似乎不成功:应该做些什么?
摘要本研究旨在寻找新的适应性商业甜白露苹(Lupinus albus L.)品种,并在埃塞俄比亚两个地点的两个生长季节评价接种量对甜白露苹和蓝露苹品种牧草和种子产量的影响。试验采用随机完全区组设计,采用7个品种* 2个接种,3个重复。以3个甜蓝品种(Bora、Sanabor和Vitabor)、3个甜白品种(Dieta、Energy和Feodora)和1个苦白品种为试验对象。方差分析采用SAS通用线性模型程序进行。地点和接种量对产量和产量参数的影响不显著(P≥0.0761)。除了第二季的鲜生物量外,品种对两季的株高、鲜生物量和千粒重均有显著影响(P≤0.035)。其对其他参数的影响在两个生长期均不显著(P≥0.134)或仅在两个生长期均显著(P≥0.134)。各品种平均干物质产量为2.45吨/公顷。然而,甜美的蓝色条目比白色条目表现得更好。蓝甘露和白地方对照的平均种子产量为每公顷2.6吨。甜蓝和甜白地方品种被发现具有耐受性,而商品甜白罗苹品种对开花后立即发生的炭疽病和镰刀菌病敏感。因此,进口的商业甜白品种的种子产量不高。通过杂交本地品种和商业品种开发适应性强、抗病高产的甜白骆马,并寻找品种专用接种剂应是今后研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hepatoprotective activity of medicinal plants, their phytochemistry, and safety concerns: a systematic review Insecticidal effect of new synthesized chalcone derivatives on Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa Comparative analysis among the degradation potential of enzymes obtained from Escherichia coli against the toxicity of sulfur dyes through molecular docking Production, purification, and determination of the biochemical properties of β-glucosidase in Trichoderma koningii via solid substrate fermentation Investigating the anti-cancer compounds from Calliandra harrisii for precision medicine in pancreatic cancer via in-silico drug design and GC-MS analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1