Are There Any Differences in Skin Barrier Function, Integrity and Skin Blood Flow between Different Subpopulations of Asians and Caucasians?

G. Yosipovitch, A. Goon, Y. Chan, C. Goh
{"title":"Are There Any Differences in Skin Barrier Function, Integrity and Skin Blood Flow between Different Subpopulations of Asians and Caucasians?","authors":"G. Yosipovitch, A. Goon, Y. Chan, C. Goh","doi":"10.1159/000069882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are few studies with a limited number of subjects examining whether there are population differences in skin barrier function between Asian skin and Caucasian skin. Objectives: To study skin barrier function and integrity in different subpopulations of Asian skin: Chinese, Malay, Indian and Caucasian. Methods: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) were measured at baseline, after tape stripping and during recovery 3 h after stripping. Barrier integrity was assessed by counting the number of tape strippings required to cause an average TEWL of 20 g/m2/h. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in basal, poststripping and 3-hour recovery TEWL and LDPI readings between the 4 ethnic groups. Neither was there any statistically significant difference in recovery rate of TEWL and LDPI reading after tape stripping. There was also no difference in barrier integrity between the ethnic groups. All parameters did not differ when skin type was analyzed. Females had a better skin integrity; however, the barrier repair was similar. Conclusion: There is no evidence to support any real difference in skin barrier function between the 4 ethnic groups and the different skin types. Females seem to have a better integrity than males.","PeriodicalId":12086,"journal":{"name":"Exogenous Dermatology","volume":"42 1","pages":"302 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exogenous Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000069882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: There are few studies with a limited number of subjects examining whether there are population differences in skin barrier function between Asian skin and Caucasian skin. Objectives: To study skin barrier function and integrity in different subpopulations of Asian skin: Chinese, Malay, Indian and Caucasian. Methods: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) were measured at baseline, after tape stripping and during recovery 3 h after stripping. Barrier integrity was assessed by counting the number of tape strippings required to cause an average TEWL of 20 g/m2/h. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in basal, poststripping and 3-hour recovery TEWL and LDPI readings between the 4 ethnic groups. Neither was there any statistically significant difference in recovery rate of TEWL and LDPI reading after tape stripping. There was also no difference in barrier integrity between the ethnic groups. All parameters did not differ when skin type was analyzed. Females had a better skin integrity; however, the barrier repair was similar. Conclusion: There is no evidence to support any real difference in skin barrier function between the 4 ethnic groups and the different skin types. Females seem to have a better integrity than males.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚洲人和高加索人不同亚群的皮肤屏障功能、完整性和皮肤血流量是否存在差异?
背景:关于亚洲皮肤和高加索皮肤之间的皮肤屏障功能是否存在人群差异的研究很少,受试者数量有限。目的:研究不同亚洲皮肤亚群:中国人、马来人、印度人和白种人的皮肤屏障功能和完整性。方法:分别在基线、撕带后和撕带后恢复3 h测量经皮失水(TEWL)和激光多普勒灌注成像(LDPI)。通过计算导致平均TEWL为20 g/m2/h所需的胶带剥离次数来评估屏障的完整性。结果:4个民族患者的TEWL、LDPI基础、剥脱后及3小时恢复值差异均无统计学意义。撕带后TEWL和LDPI读数的恢复率也无统计学差异。种族群体之间的屏障完整性也没有差异。分析皮肤类型时,所有参数均无差异。女性有更好的皮肤完整性;然而,屏障修复是相似的。结论:没有证据支持4个民族和不同皮肤类型之间的皮肤屏障功能存在真正的差异。女性似乎比男性更正直。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgement to Referees for Exogenous Dermatology 2004 Contents Vol. 3, 2004 Author Index Vol. 3, 2004 Is There Evidence that Geraniol Causes Allergic Contact Dermatitis? Subject Index Vol. 3, 2004
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1