Third-Person Effect, Religiosity and Support for Censorship of Satirical Religious Cartoons

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Journal of Media and Religion Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.1080/15348423.2016.1248183
Larry James Webster, J. Li, Yicheng Zhu, A. Luchsinger, Anan Wan, M. Tatge
{"title":"Third-Person Effect, Religiosity and Support for Censorship of Satirical Religious Cartoons","authors":"Larry James Webster, J. Li, Yicheng Zhu, A. Luchsinger, Anan Wan, M. Tatge","doi":"10.1080/15348423.2016.1248183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The violent attack on the staff of Charlie Hebdo and an earlier plot to kill cartoonists from the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten raise the issue of censorship of satirical religious cartoons to avoid potential retaliatory violence from those offended by the cartoons. With third-person effect (TPE) as the theoretical underpinning, this study examined the relationship among TPE, religiosity, and support for censorship of religious satirical cartoons. Data were collected in May 2015. A national sample of participants (N=374) was acquired through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. The results show that individuals with a higher degree of religiosity are more likely to support censorship of satirical religious cartoons, and though TPE is not positively correlated to support for censorship, respondents’ perception of the effect of the cartoons on themselves may indicate an increased propensity for supporting censorship.","PeriodicalId":55954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Religion","volume":"41 1","pages":"186 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2016.1248183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The violent attack on the staff of Charlie Hebdo and an earlier plot to kill cartoonists from the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten raise the issue of censorship of satirical religious cartoons to avoid potential retaliatory violence from those offended by the cartoons. With third-person effect (TPE) as the theoretical underpinning, this study examined the relationship among TPE, religiosity, and support for censorship of religious satirical cartoons. Data were collected in May 2015. A national sample of participants (N=374) was acquired through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. The results show that individuals with a higher degree of religiosity are more likely to support censorship of satirical religious cartoons, and though TPE is not positively correlated to support for censorship, respondents’ perception of the effect of the cartoons on themselves may indicate an increased propensity for supporting censorship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三人称效应、宗教性和对讽刺宗教漫画审查制度的支持
针对《查理周报》工作人员的暴力袭击,以及早先针对丹麦《日德兰邮报》漫画家的暗杀阴谋,引发了对讽刺宗教漫画进行审查的问题,以避免被漫画冒犯的人可能采取报复性暴力。本研究以第三人称效应(TPE)为理论基础,探讨了第三人称效应、宗教虔诚度和宗教讽刺漫画审查支持度之间的关系。数据收集于2015年5月。参与者的全国样本(N=374)是通过亚马逊的土耳其机器人获得的。研究结果显示,具有较高宗教信仰程度的个人更倾向于支持对讽刺宗教漫画的审查,虽然TPE与支持审查的正相关,但受访者对漫画对自己的影响的感知可能表明支持审查的倾向增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Still Fighting the God-Vs.-Gays Battle: Twitter Reaction to Presidential Candidate Pete Buttigieg’s Identification as a Gay Member of the Christian Left Tweeting for Religion: How Indonesian Islamic Fundamentalist Organizations Use Twitter Differences in Religious Framing of Muslims and Islam in American Media Coverage Before and After the Trump Campaign Faith Discourses in the Context of Racial Tension: Black Lives Matter and Its Counter-Narratives Digital Merit: A Case Study of a Chinese Buddhist Meditation Group on WeChat During the Early Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1