The co-production of nuclear science and diplomacy: towards a transnational understanding of nuclear things

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY History and Technology Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07341512.2021.1905462
Kenji Ito, Maria Rentetzi
{"title":"The co-production of nuclear science and diplomacy: towards a transnational understanding of nuclear things","authors":"Kenji Ito, Maria Rentetzi","doi":"10.1080/07341512.2021.1905462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper proposes diplomatic studies of science as a new field of research, which sheds light on actual diplomatic processes as an integral part of knowledge making and presents the notion of nuclear science and diplomacy as co-produced. Science and diplomacy display fundamental similarities: scientists attempt to make knowledge produced locally seem global, thereby achieving universal epistemic order, while diplomats endeavour to maintain political order on a global scale that accommodates the local concerns of their country. In particular, the co-production of nuclear knowledge and political nuclear order has characterised the post-World War Two period. Hence, the making of global political orders includes the emergence of relevant diplomatic actors, which comprise not only sovereign states but also non-state actors, such as international organisations or individual experts. This paper claims that nuclear history provides a suitable ground for cross-fertilisation between the history of science and diplomatic history.","PeriodicalId":45996,"journal":{"name":"History and Technology","volume":"168 1","pages":"4 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2021.1905462","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper proposes diplomatic studies of science as a new field of research, which sheds light on actual diplomatic processes as an integral part of knowledge making and presents the notion of nuclear science and diplomacy as co-produced. Science and diplomacy display fundamental similarities: scientists attempt to make knowledge produced locally seem global, thereby achieving universal epistemic order, while diplomats endeavour to maintain political order on a global scale that accommodates the local concerns of their country. In particular, the co-production of nuclear knowledge and political nuclear order has characterised the post-World War Two period. Hence, the making of global political orders includes the emergence of relevant diplomatic actors, which comprise not only sovereign states but also non-state actors, such as international organisations or individual experts. This paper claims that nuclear history provides a suitable ground for cross-fertilisation between the history of science and diplomatic history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核科学与外交的合作:实现对核事物的跨国理解
本文提出科学外交研究作为一个新的研究领域,它揭示了作为知识制造的一个组成部分的实际外交过程,并提出了核科学与外交共同产生的概念。科学和外交表现出基本的相似之处:科学家试图使当地产生的知识看起来是全球性的,从而实现普遍的认识秩序,而外交官则努力维持全球范围内的政治秩序,以适应他们国家的地方关切。特别是,核知识和政治核秩序的共同生产是二战后时期的特征。因此,全球政治秩序的建立包括相关外交行为体的出现,这些行为体不仅包括主权国家,还包括非国家行为体,如国际组织或个人专家。本文认为,核史为科学史和外交史之间的相互融合提供了一个合适的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: History and Technology serves as an international forum for research on technology in history. A guiding premise is that technology—as knowledge, practice, and material resource—has been a key site for constituting the human experience. In the modern era, it becomes central to our understanding of the making and transformation of societies and cultures, on a local or transnational scale. The journal welcomes historical contributions on any aspect of technology but encourages research that addresses this wider frame through commensurate analytic and critical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Hegemony, co-production and the American Empire: essays in honor of John Krige About the Cover Striking the empire back: Dr. Strangelove and the global histories of technology Botanical surveying, nation-building and American empire: the US quest for a Philippine flora, 1903–1925 How the United States learned to commodify the transnational atom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1