Do Public Opinion Polls actually Provide a Survey of Public Opinion

I. Šubrt
{"title":"Do Public Opinion Polls actually Provide a Survey of Public Opinion","authors":"I. Šubrt","doi":"10.31857/S013216250003169-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociological debates about public opinion have to weigh up theoretical dilemmas. The first of these dilemmas concerns whether public opinion appeared only with the advent of modern society, or whether it was a phenomenon in other, earlier types of society. The second dilemma is associated with the opposites of «realistic» and «nominalistic» approaches. The third dilemma is the contradiction between «monistic» and «pluralistic» positions. However, if we proceed from the theory of public opinion to its survey, we find a surprising thing: all the mentioned theoretical dilemmas are irrelevant from the survey point of view. Researchers (pollsters) are basically satisfied with a concept of public opinion which can be described as «operational». According to this, public opinion is what is measured by polls of public opinion. The basic pitfall of the operational conception is that surveys which should capture and analyze public opinion can easily fit the purpose of their specific producer, as the method of surveying public opinion can be transformed into an instrument for shaping it.","PeriodicalId":85741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of sociological studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of sociological studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250003169-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sociological debates about public opinion have to weigh up theoretical dilemmas. The first of these dilemmas concerns whether public opinion appeared only with the advent of modern society, or whether it was a phenomenon in other, earlier types of society. The second dilemma is associated with the opposites of «realistic» and «nominalistic» approaches. The third dilemma is the contradiction between «monistic» and «pluralistic» positions. However, if we proceed from the theory of public opinion to its survey, we find a surprising thing: all the mentioned theoretical dilemmas are irrelevant from the survey point of view. Researchers (pollsters) are basically satisfied with a concept of public opinion which can be described as «operational». According to this, public opinion is what is measured by polls of public opinion. The basic pitfall of the operational conception is that surveys which should capture and analyze public opinion can easily fit the purpose of their specific producer, as the method of surveying public opinion can be transformed into an instrument for shaping it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民意调查真的提供了民意调查吗
关于公众舆论的社会学辩论必须权衡理论困境。这些困境中的第一个涉及公众舆论是随着现代社会的到来才出现的,还是在其他更早类型的社会中出现的一种现象。第二个困境与“现实主义”和“唯名主义”方法的对立面有关。第三个困境是“一元论”和“多元主义”立场之间的矛盾。然而,如果我们从民意理论出发到民意调查,我们会发现一个令人惊讶的现象:从民意调查的角度来看,上述所有理论困境都是无关的。研究人员(民意调查者)基本上对一个可以被描述为“可操作”的民意概念感到满意。据此,民意是通过民意调查来衡量的。业务概念的基本缺陷是,应该捕捉和分析公众舆论的调查很容易符合其具体生产者的目的,因为调查公众舆论的方法可以转变为形成舆论的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Оккультизм в сознании горожан Казахстана Опыт перехода российских компаний на удалённую работу в ситуации пандемии The Elderly and Physical Activity: A Qualitative Method The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Balancing between Culturalism and Scientism Sociology and Military Studies: Broadening the Perspective, Using the Classics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1