Penolakan Permohonan Itsbat Nikah Oleh Hakim di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Padang

A. Ilham, Zainal Azwar
{"title":"Penolakan Permohonan Itsbat Nikah Oleh Hakim di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Padang","authors":"A. Ilham, Zainal Azwar","doi":"10.32694/qst.v20i1.1741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explains the application for marriage certificate which was rejected by the Religious Court. This research is focused on what are the reasons that lead to the rejection of the application and what are the efforts, both legal and non-legal, made by the applicant whose application was rejected. This study uses a normative-empirical legal research method with a judicial case study approach. Data was collected from documents and from informants through interviews. The source of the document is in the form of a request document and a judge's decision at the Class 1A Padang Religious Court; while interviews were conducted with applicants whose applications were rejected, from officials at the Office of Religious Affairs, and from officers from the Population and Civil Registry Service. This study shows that there are five reasons for rejection by the Religious Court Class 1A Padang of filing a marriage certificate application, namely because the applicant is still married to another person, the guardian who is marrying is invalid, the marriage is still under public, witnesses cannot provide information that can accepted, and the applicant was not present at the trial. The efforts made by the applicant whose application was rejected were only in the form of non-legal efforts. Of all the cases examined, none of the applicants made further legal efforts in the form of cassation due to their ignorance. They made other efforts in the form of re-marriage at the Office of Religious Affairs and determining the origin of the children.","PeriodicalId":33705,"journal":{"name":"AlTADIB Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlTADIB Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v20i1.1741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explains the application for marriage certificate which was rejected by the Religious Court. This research is focused on what are the reasons that lead to the rejection of the application and what are the efforts, both legal and non-legal, made by the applicant whose application was rejected. This study uses a normative-empirical legal research method with a judicial case study approach. Data was collected from documents and from informants through interviews. The source of the document is in the form of a request document and a judge's decision at the Class 1A Padang Religious Court; while interviews were conducted with applicants whose applications were rejected, from officials at the Office of Religious Affairs, and from officers from the Population and Civil Registry Service. This study shows that there are five reasons for rejection by the Religious Court Class 1A Padang of filing a marriage certificate application, namely because the applicant is still married to another person, the guardian who is marrying is invalid, the marriage is still under public, witnesses cannot provide information that can accepted, and the applicant was not present at the trial. The efforts made by the applicant whose application was rejected were only in the form of non-legal efforts. Of all the cases examined, none of the applicants made further legal efforts in the form of cassation due to their ignorance. They made other efforts in the form of re-marriage at the Office of Religious Affairs and determining the origin of the children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对巴东1A班宗教法庭法官的婚姻申请
这篇文章解释了申请结婚证书被宗教法院拒绝的情况。本研究的重点是导致申请被拒绝的原因,以及申请被拒绝的申请人所做的合法和非合法的努力。本研究采用规范-实证的法律研究方法和司法案例研究方法。数据是从文件和通过访谈从举报人处收集的。该文件的来源是巴东1A类宗教法院的请求文件和法官判决的形式;同时,对申请被拒绝的申请人、宗教事务局官员以及人口和民事登记处官员进行了面谈。本研究表明,巴东1A类宗教法院拒绝申请结婚证书的原因有五个,即申请人仍与他人结婚,结婚的监护人无效,婚姻仍处于公开状态,证人无法提供可接受的信息,申请人未出席审判。申请被拒的申请人所作的努力只是以非法律努力的形式。在审查的所有案件中,没有一个申请人由于无知而以撤销上诉的形式作出进一步的法律努力。他们还作出了其他努力,如在宗教事务办公室再婚和确定孩子的出身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS SURAT AL-MAIDAH AYAT 38 TENTANG PENERAPAN HAD POTONG TANGAN KASUS PENCURIAN PERSPEKTIF TAFSIR AL-MISHBAH DERADIKALISASI ATAS PEMAHAMAN AL-QUR’AN (ANALISIS SEMANTIK DAN KONTEKS HISTORIS TERHADAP AYAT-AYAT TENTANG JIH?D DAN QIT?L) KEARIFAN LOKAL DALAM TAFSIR TARJUMAN AL-MUSTAFID KARYA ABDUL RAUF AL-SINGKILI PENERAPAN HAD POTONG TANGAN PADA KASUS PENCURIAN (Analisis Surat Al-Maidah Ayat 38 Berbasis Hadis) AL-QUR’AN, REALITAS, SAINTISME, DAN PERSOALAN FILSAFAT ILMU: SUATU TINJAUAN RINGKAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1