Ten forms of recognition and misrecognition in long-term care for older people

Q2 Arts and Humanities SATS Pub Date : 2018-10-12 DOI:10.1515/SATS-2016-0017
Arto Laitinen, Jari Pirhonen
{"title":"Ten forms of recognition and misrecognition in long-term care for older people","authors":"Arto Laitinen, Jari Pirhonen","doi":"10.1515/SATS-2016-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During recent decades, theories of mutual recognition have been intensively debated in social philosophy. According to one of the main theorists in the field, Axel Honneth, the entire social world may be based on interpersonal recognition (such as mutual respect, esteem and care). Our aim is to study what it would take that residents in long-term care would become adequately interpersonally recognized. We also examine who could be seen as bearing the responsibility for providing such recognition. In this paper, we distinguish ten aspects of recognition. We suggest that in order to support residents’ dignity, long-term care should be arranged in a way that preserves residents’ full personhood regardless of their cognitive or other abilities: the mere fact that they are human persons is a ground for recognition as a person. But further, in good care residents’ personal characteristics and residents’ ties to significant others are also recognized to enable them to feel loved, esteemed and respected.","PeriodicalId":38824,"journal":{"name":"SATS","volume":"1 1","pages":"53 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SATS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/SATS-2016-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract During recent decades, theories of mutual recognition have been intensively debated in social philosophy. According to one of the main theorists in the field, Axel Honneth, the entire social world may be based on interpersonal recognition (such as mutual respect, esteem and care). Our aim is to study what it would take that residents in long-term care would become adequately interpersonally recognized. We also examine who could be seen as bearing the responsibility for providing such recognition. In this paper, we distinguish ten aspects of recognition. We suggest that in order to support residents’ dignity, long-term care should be arranged in a way that preserves residents’ full personhood regardless of their cognitive or other abilities: the mere fact that they are human persons is a ground for recognition as a person. But further, in good care residents’ personal characteristics and residents’ ties to significant others are also recognized to enable them to feel loved, esteemed and respected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人长期护理中的十种认识和误解
近几十年来,社会哲学界对互认理论进行了激烈的争论。该领域的主要理论家之一阿克塞尔·霍尼特(Axel Honneth)认为,整个社会可能是建立在人际认知(如相互尊重、尊重和关怀)的基础上的。我们的目的是研究怎样才能使长期护理的居民得到充分的人际认可。我们还研究了谁可以被视为承担提供这种承认的责任。在本文中,我们区分了识别的十个方面。我们建议,为了支持居民的尊严,长期护理应该以一种保留居民完整人格的方式安排,而不管他们的认知或其他能力:他们是人的事实是一个被认可为人的理由。此外,在良好的护理中,居民的个人特征和居民与重要他人的联系也得到了认可,使他们感到被爱、被尊重和被尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SATS
SATS Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Do Logical Aliens Think? Frege’s Agent-Relative View of Logic’s Constitutive Role for Thinking Between Virtuous Trust and Distrust: A Model of Political Ideologies in Times of Challenged Political Parties Scientific Testability Following the Assumption of Insufficient Knowledge and Resources Journalists Gaining Trust Through Silencing of the Self Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1