Prevalence of the most common psychological problems during coronavirus epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Parandis Pourdehghan, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi, S. Mostafavi
{"title":"Prevalence of the most common psychological problems during coronavirus epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Parandis Pourdehghan, Mohammad Reza Mohammadi, S. Mostafavi","doi":"10.2478/cpp-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: There have been so far three noteworthy epidemics caused by coronaviruses: SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. We aimed to review prevalence of the most common psychological problems during these epidemics. Material and methods: We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies. A comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO/ProQuest, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers searched for all English-language articles on psychological problems during coronavirus epidemics published by February 2021. We used DerSimonion-Laird random-effects model to estimate the prevalence of psychological problems. We conducted subgroup analyses to analyze the source of heterogeneity. Meta-regression model was also used. Results: Eighty-eight eligible papers were included. The prevalence of the most common psychological problems was insomnia (27%), depression (24.8%), stress (22%), and anxiety (12.4%), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that healthcare workers were more likely to have the mentioned psychological problems compared to survivors and the general population. According to meta-regression analyses, study tools and study populations were identified as the most important sources of heterogeneity. Variability in study tools and study populations was attributed to a high level of heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study suggested that people during coronavirus epidemics were exposed to insomnia, depression, stress, and anxiety far more than other psychological problems.","PeriodicalId":56342,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems of Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"41 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cpp-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: There have been so far three noteworthy epidemics caused by coronaviruses: SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. We aimed to review prevalence of the most common psychological problems during these epidemics. Material and methods: We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies. A comprehensive search was performed in electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO/ProQuest, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers searched for all English-language articles on psychological problems during coronavirus epidemics published by February 2021. We used DerSimonion-Laird random-effects model to estimate the prevalence of psychological problems. We conducted subgroup analyses to analyze the source of heterogeneity. Meta-regression model was also used. Results: Eighty-eight eligible papers were included. The prevalence of the most common psychological problems was insomnia (27%), depression (24.8%), stress (22%), and anxiety (12.4%), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that healthcare workers were more likely to have the mentioned psychological problems compared to survivors and the general population. According to meta-regression analyses, study tools and study populations were identified as the most important sources of heterogeneity. Variability in study tools and study populations was attributed to a high level of heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study suggested that people during coronavirus epidemics were exposed to insomnia, depression, stress, and anxiety far more than other psychological problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状病毒流行期间最常见心理问题的流行:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
摘要:迄今为止,由冠状病毒引起的疫情有三次值得关注:SARS、MERS和COVID-19。我们的目的是回顾这些流行病期间最常见的心理问题的流行情况。材料和方法:我们对研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。在PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science、PsycINFO/ProQuest、SCOPUS和Google Scholar等电子数据库中进行全面检索。两名独立审稿人检索了截至2021年2月发表的所有关于冠状病毒流行期间心理问题的英文文章。我们使用dersimonon - laird随机效应模型来估计心理问题的患病率。我们进行亚组分析来分析异质性的来源。采用元回归模型。结果:纳入符合条件的论文88篇。最常见的心理问题分别是失眠(27%)、抑郁(24.8%)、压力(22%)和焦虑(12.4%)。亚组分析表明,与幸存者和一般人群相比,卫生保健工作者更有可能出现上述心理问题。根据meta回归分析,研究工具和研究人群被确定为异质性的最重要来源。研究工具和研究人群的差异归因于高水平的异质性。结论:本研究表明,在冠状病毒流行期间,人们面临的失眠、抑郁、压力和焦虑远远超过其他心理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The quarterly Current Problems of Psychiatry is a continuation of the volume "Research on Schizophrenia" and is addressed to a wide group of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. The quarterly is a reviewed scientific journal of international scope, publishing original papers, review papers, case studies, conference reports, letters to the editor and book reviews. The aim of the "Current Problems of Psychiatry" is providing a wide audience with scientific works, representing a significant contribution to the development of psychiatry and clinical psychology. The works published in the journal are printed in Polish and English. Terms and Conditions for publishing manuscripts in the quarterly are available on the website www.cppsych.umlub.pl in the tab "Requirements".
期刊最新文献
Retrospective assessment of parental attitudes versus severity of early maladaptive schemas in a non-clinical population of Polish adults – preliminary reports Can an artist be mature? Rorschach studies of prominent Polish actors Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental state of Polish students Hungry brain: about the possible contribution of neurotrophic factors to anorexia nervosa Efficacy and safety assessment of different electrode placements during electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of depression: a comparison of bitemporal, bifrontal and unilateral right-sided stimulation - a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1