Donor Milk Banking - Safety, Efficacy, New Methodologies.

C. Fusch, C. Gebauer
{"title":"Donor Milk Banking - Safety, Efficacy, New Methodologies.","authors":"C. Fusch, C. Gebauer","doi":"10.1159/000519400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Donor milk (DM) is of increasing interest as primary nutritional source for preterm infants. Safe access requires special infrastructure, trained staff, sophisticated algorithms, and standard operating procedures as well as quality control measures. DM has limitations like low protein content and unpredictable composition of the other macronutrients, despite fortification frequently not meeting recommendations - both of them compromising growth. The first paragraph is devoted to COVID-19 and how it impacts processes of DM banking. The following paragraphs review aspects of \"pasteurization,\" \"safety audits/donor screening,\" and \"DM nutrient variability.\" In summary, (i) Holder pasteurization still is the most suitable procedure for milk banks, but high-pressure pasteurization or ultraviolet C irradiation conserve the unique properties of DM better and deserve more research to make it suitable for clinical routine. (ii) In regard to safety/screening, guidelines are valuable for safe DM bank operation, but they differ between legislations. There is a surprisingly high rate of non-disclosed donor smoking (0.3%, p > 0.05) and of adulteration of delivered DM (up to 2%, p < 0.05) not detected by standard donor screening procedures. Frequencies differ between remunerated and non-remunerated programs. (iii) Neonatal caregivers should be aware of unpredictable composition of DM. They should be trained on how these can be overcome to avoid negative impact on growth and long-term outcomes like (a) measuring and disclosing nutrient contents of delivered DM batches to customers, (b) implementing certain types of donor pooling to reduce the risk of macronutrient depleted DM, (c) additional supplementation using 0.3-0.5 g protein/100 mL seems to be reasonable, (d) adjusted fortification may help to improve growth, but is not efficient in all preterm infants, (e) target fortification seems to improve growth (and probably also neurodevelopmental index) compared to standard fortification, (f) more research and clinical studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":18986,"journal":{"name":"Nestle Nutrition Institute workshop series","volume":"76 1","pages":"57-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nestle Nutrition Institute workshop series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Donor milk (DM) is of increasing interest as primary nutritional source for preterm infants. Safe access requires special infrastructure, trained staff, sophisticated algorithms, and standard operating procedures as well as quality control measures. DM has limitations like low protein content and unpredictable composition of the other macronutrients, despite fortification frequently not meeting recommendations - both of them compromising growth. The first paragraph is devoted to COVID-19 and how it impacts processes of DM banking. The following paragraphs review aspects of "pasteurization," "safety audits/donor screening," and "DM nutrient variability." In summary, (i) Holder pasteurization still is the most suitable procedure for milk banks, but high-pressure pasteurization or ultraviolet C irradiation conserve the unique properties of DM better and deserve more research to make it suitable for clinical routine. (ii) In regard to safety/screening, guidelines are valuable for safe DM bank operation, but they differ between legislations. There is a surprisingly high rate of non-disclosed donor smoking (0.3%, p > 0.05) and of adulteration of delivered DM (up to 2%, p < 0.05) not detected by standard donor screening procedures. Frequencies differ between remunerated and non-remunerated programs. (iii) Neonatal caregivers should be aware of unpredictable composition of DM. They should be trained on how these can be overcome to avoid negative impact on growth and long-term outcomes like (a) measuring and disclosing nutrient contents of delivered DM batches to customers, (b) implementing certain types of donor pooling to reduce the risk of macronutrient depleted DM, (c) additional supplementation using 0.3-0.5 g protein/100 mL seems to be reasonable, (d) adjusted fortification may help to improve growth, but is not efficient in all preterm infants, (e) target fortification seems to improve growth (and probably also neurodevelopmental index) compared to standard fortification, (f) more research and clinical studies are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捐赠母乳银行-安全性,有效性,新方法。
供乳(DM)作为早产儿的主要营养来源越来越受到关注。安全访问需要特殊的基础设施、训练有素的工作人员、复杂的算法、标准的操作程序以及质量控制措施。DM有局限性,比如蛋白质含量低,其他宏量营养素的组成不可预测,尽管强化经常达不到建议水平——这两种情况都会影响生长。第一段专门讨论COVID-19及其对DM银行业务流程的影响。以下段落回顾了“巴氏灭菌”、“安全审计/供体筛选”和“DM营养变异性”方面的内容。综上所述,(1)固定式巴氏灭菌法仍然是乳库最适合的方法,但高压巴氏灭菌法或紫外线C照射法能更好地保存乳库的独特特性,值得进一步研究,使其适合临床常规。(ii)关于安全/筛选,指导方针对于DM银行的安全操作是有价值的,但它们在立法之间有所不同。未披露的献血者吸烟(0.3%,p > 0.05)和掺假的DM(高达2%,p < 0.05)在标准的献血者筛查程序中未被检测出来的比例高得惊人。有酬节目和无酬节目的频率不同。(iii)新生儿护理人员应该意识到DM的不可预测成分。他们应该接受培训,了解如何克服这些问题,以避免对生长和长期结果产生负面影响,如(a)测量并向客户披露交付的DM批次的营养成分含量,(b)实施某些类型的供体池,以降低DM大量营养素消耗的风险,(c)额外补充0.3-0.5 g蛋白质/100 mL似乎是合理的。(d)调整强化可能有助于促进生长,但并非对所有早产儿都有效;(e)与标准强化相比,目标强化似乎可以促进生长(可能还包括神经发育指数);(f)需要更多的研究和临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nestle Nutrition Institute workshop series
Nestle Nutrition Institute workshop series Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Gut Microbiota Assembly Begins at Birth and Needs to Be Nurtured. Healthy Diets at the Intersection of Human and Planetary Health. Achievements, Challenges, and Future Direction in Early Life Nutrition. An Offspring's Health Starts Before Conception and Results of the NiPPeR Randomized Trial. Better Early: Critical Windows in Brain and Cognitive Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1