Looking for Medical Advice in Everyday Digital Spaces: A Qualitative Study of Indians Connecting with Physicians on Facebook

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Vikalpa Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1177/02560909211023163
Smeeta Mishra
{"title":"Looking for Medical Advice in Everyday Digital Spaces: A Qualitative Study of Indians Connecting with Physicians on Facebook","authors":"Smeeta Mishra","doi":"10.1177/02560909211023163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a world afflicted by COVID-19, many people consult doctors through a digital interface or over the phone, as face-to-face consultations are almost impossible during a lockdown. The Medical Council of India and the NITI Aayog, a policy think tank, formulated new guidelines to empower medical practitioners to practice telemedicine in India in March 2020. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the world and made digital consultations a necessity in specific cases, academic studies located within a health promotion framework in Western contexts indicated that patients have been very much interested in using social media tools to communicate with their physicians. Previous studies have also highlighted the advantages of information and communication technologies for patient–doctor interaction. Since changes introduced by digital health technologies have primarily been analysed from such health promotion perspectives that often adopt a ‘techno-utopian’ lens (Lupton, 2013), it becomes imperative to critically interrogate how such changes construct specific subjectivities and shape our understandings of health and normative healthcare practices. Specifically, scholars have highlighted how social media platforms and apps act as ‘performative devices’ (Johnson, 2014) that influence ‘everyday management of illness and health’ and help create the ideal of the ‘digitally engaged patient’ (Lupton, 2013). In the Indian context, media reports highlight a growing trend in the use of social media platforms and apps by physicians and patients. However, academic research on such emerging phenomena in this country is still scarce. This exploratory study examines why some Indians connect with physicians on a social media platform such as Facebook, the nature of communication between them and their understandings of health. It uses in-depth interviews and draws upon neoliberal governmentality as a theoretical anchor. The findings show how the internalization of neoliberal values and assumptions are associated with participants’ search for lifestyle and medical advice in everyday digital spaces such as Facebook. This study strives to extend the concept of neoliberal governmentality to performances in everyday digital spaces such as Facebook. In terms of practical implications, the results of the study highlight the critical need for policies that regulate the medical content available in social media spaces. Most importantly, some of the issues highlighted by the participants in this study can help policymakers take adequate precautions while formulating guidelines on digital consultations, especially during pandemics and their aftermath when there is tremendous pressure to promote telemedicine.","PeriodicalId":35878,"journal":{"name":"Vikalpa","volume":"56 1","pages":"86 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vikalpa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02560909211023163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In a world afflicted by COVID-19, many people consult doctors through a digital interface or over the phone, as face-to-face consultations are almost impossible during a lockdown. The Medical Council of India and the NITI Aayog, a policy think tank, formulated new guidelines to empower medical practitioners to practice telemedicine in India in March 2020. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the world and made digital consultations a necessity in specific cases, academic studies located within a health promotion framework in Western contexts indicated that patients have been very much interested in using social media tools to communicate with their physicians. Previous studies have also highlighted the advantages of information and communication technologies for patient–doctor interaction. Since changes introduced by digital health technologies have primarily been analysed from such health promotion perspectives that often adopt a ‘techno-utopian’ lens (Lupton, 2013), it becomes imperative to critically interrogate how such changes construct specific subjectivities and shape our understandings of health and normative healthcare practices. Specifically, scholars have highlighted how social media platforms and apps act as ‘performative devices’ (Johnson, 2014) that influence ‘everyday management of illness and health’ and help create the ideal of the ‘digitally engaged patient’ (Lupton, 2013). In the Indian context, media reports highlight a growing trend in the use of social media platforms and apps by physicians and patients. However, academic research on such emerging phenomena in this country is still scarce. This exploratory study examines why some Indians connect with physicians on a social media platform such as Facebook, the nature of communication between them and their understandings of health. It uses in-depth interviews and draws upon neoliberal governmentality as a theoretical anchor. The findings show how the internalization of neoliberal values and assumptions are associated with participants’ search for lifestyle and medical advice in everyday digital spaces such as Facebook. This study strives to extend the concept of neoliberal governmentality to performances in everyday digital spaces such as Facebook. In terms of practical implications, the results of the study highlight the critical need for policies that regulate the medical content available in social media spaces. Most importantly, some of the issues highlighted by the participants in this study can help policymakers take adequate precautions while formulating guidelines on digital consultations, especially during pandemics and their aftermath when there is tremendous pressure to promote telemedicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在日常数字空间寻找医疗建议:印度人在Facebook上与医生联系的定性研究
在受COVID-19困扰的世界里,许多人通过数字界面或电话咨询医生,因为在封锁期间几乎不可能进行面对面的咨询。2020年3月,印度医学委员会和政策智库NITI Aayog制定了新的指导方针,授权医疗从业者在印度实施远程医疗。甚至在COVID-19大流行席卷全球并使数字咨询成为特定病例的必要之前,在西方背景下健康促进框架内的学术研究表明,患者对使用社交媒体工具与医生沟通非常感兴趣。以往的研究也强调了信息和通信技术在医患互动方面的优势。由于数字健康技术带来的变化主要是从通常采用“技术乌托邦”视角的健康促进角度进行分析(Lupton, 2013),因此必须批判性地询问这些变化如何构建特定的主体性并塑造我们对健康和规范医疗保健实践的理解。具体来说,学者们强调了社交媒体平台和应用程序如何作为“行为设备”(Johnson, 2014),影响“疾病和健康的日常管理”,并帮助创造“数字参与患者”的理想(Lupton, 2013)。在印度,媒体报道强调了医生和患者使用社交媒体平台和应用程序的增长趋势。然而,国内对这一新兴现象的学术研究仍然很少。这项探索性研究调查了为什么一些印度人在Facebook等社交媒体平台上与医生联系,他们之间沟通的性质以及他们对健康的理解。它采用深度访谈,并将新自由主义治理作为理论基础。研究结果表明,新自由主义价值观和假设的内化与参与者在Facebook等日常数字空间中搜索生活方式和医疗建议之间的关系。本研究力求将新自由主义治理的概念扩展到日常数字空间(如Facebook)的表现。就实际意义而言,研究结果强调了制定政策规范社交媒体空间中可用的医疗内容的迫切需要。最重要的是,本研究参与者强调的一些问题可以帮助决策者在制定数字咨询准则时采取充分的预防措施,特别是在大流行及其后果期间,在面临推动远程医疗的巨大压力时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vikalpa
Vikalpa Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Distinct Dimensions of Human Capital in Distressed Firms: Implications for Firms and Research The Genesis of the Crypto-economy: Application of the Institutional Theory The Need for Localized, Socio-economic Policy Measures for Controlling a Pandemic: An Empirical Study of COVID-19 in India Digital Darwinism: Surviving the New Age of Business Disruption Shades of Grey: An Ethical Dilemma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1