Visualization analysis of the international standard ISO/TC 249 for traditional Chinese medicine

Q3 Medicine Digital Chinese Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dcmed.2022.06.001
Zhao Shuting , Zhong Yanmei , Hu Yuanzhang , Sun Tao , Wu Chunjie , Wen Chuanbiao
{"title":"Visualization analysis of the international standard ISO/TC 249 for traditional Chinese medicine","authors":"Zhao Shuting ,&nbsp;Zhong Yanmei ,&nbsp;Hu Yuanzhang ,&nbsp;Sun Tao ,&nbsp;Wu Chunjie ,&nbsp;Wen Chuanbiao","doi":"10.1016/j.dcmed.2022.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study proposes to visually review the current situation and progress of standards sets by the International Organization for Standardization/Technical Committee on Traditional Chinese Medicine (ISO/TC 249). The review aims to explore the development strategies of the standards, which will exhibit the considerable impact on the economy, trade and exchanges, and cooperation in the area of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>ISO/TC 249 standards were searched on the ISO website, and their title, proposed time, current stage, scope, and classification were obtained for further summarization. Gephi was utilized to portray the co-occurrence network graph of the ISO/TC 249 standards subject.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In ISO/TC 249, there were 116 standards, including 81 published standards and 35 developing standards by April 30, 2022. Two withdrawal standards were published after revision, which were not counted in the total standards. The number of published standards has been increasing since the first standard was published in 2014, whose title was “Sterile acupuncture needles for single use”. Among these standards, 17.24% (20/116) standards were in review, 56.03% (65/116) in publication, 3.45% (4/116) in approval, 5.17% (6/116) in enquiry, 3.45% (4/116) in committee, and 14.66% (17/116) in preparation, respectively. With 116 standards, most of the research focused on the medicament, as its classification of the International Classification for Standards (ICS) showed the proportion reaching 49.54%. The network analysis data revealed that the top five most frequent words were “materials” “root” “requirements” “products” and “system”, after removing the noise data, such as prepositions, conjunctions, and pronouns. Additionally, the word “system” co-exists with the terms “computerized” “coding” “image” “tongue” and “analysis”; the word “requirement” co-exists with “manufacturing” “decoction” “process” and “materials”; whereas the word “devices” co-exists with “pulse” “electric” “skin” and “measurement”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>With the increased diversification and complexity of problems, the development of standards is also oriented to multidisciplinary fields to cultivate the interdisciplinary talents, and especially the international standardization talents of compound TCM. Multi-angle analysis, formulation, and demonstration of standards, in line with industry needs in different disciplines, enhance the availability of standards and the ability to serve the industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33578,"journal":{"name":"Digital Chinese Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589377722000283/pdfft?md5=159f851dc9afcb3f0eae9ea80235dcf1&pid=1-s2.0-S2589377722000283-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589377722000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

This study proposes to visually review the current situation and progress of standards sets by the International Organization for Standardization/Technical Committee on Traditional Chinese Medicine (ISO/TC 249). The review aims to explore the development strategies of the standards, which will exhibit the considerable impact on the economy, trade and exchanges, and cooperation in the area of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM).

Methods

ISO/TC 249 standards were searched on the ISO website, and their title, proposed time, current stage, scope, and classification were obtained for further summarization. Gephi was utilized to portray the co-occurrence network graph of the ISO/TC 249 standards subject.

Results

In ISO/TC 249, there were 116 standards, including 81 published standards and 35 developing standards by April 30, 2022. Two withdrawal standards were published after revision, which were not counted in the total standards. The number of published standards has been increasing since the first standard was published in 2014, whose title was “Sterile acupuncture needles for single use”. Among these standards, 17.24% (20/116) standards were in review, 56.03% (65/116) in publication, 3.45% (4/116) in approval, 5.17% (6/116) in enquiry, 3.45% (4/116) in committee, and 14.66% (17/116) in preparation, respectively. With 116 standards, most of the research focused on the medicament, as its classification of the International Classification for Standards (ICS) showed the proportion reaching 49.54%. The network analysis data revealed that the top five most frequent words were “materials” “root” “requirements” “products” and “system”, after removing the noise data, such as prepositions, conjunctions, and pronouns. Additionally, the word “system” co-exists with the terms “computerized” “coding” “image” “tongue” and “analysis”; the word “requirement” co-exists with “manufacturing” “decoction” “process” and “materials”; whereas the word “devices” co-exists with “pulse” “electric” “skin” and “measurement”.

Conclusion

With the increased diversification and complexity of problems, the development of standards is also oriented to multidisciplinary fields to cultivate the interdisciplinary talents, and especially the international standardization talents of compound TCM. Multi-angle analysis, formulation, and demonstration of standards, in line with industry needs in different disciplines, enhance the availability of standards and the ability to serve the industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中药国际标准ISO/TC 249的可视化分析
目的对国际标准化组织/中医药技术委员会(ISO/ tc249)标准制定的现状和进展进行综述。审查旨在探讨标准的发展战略,这将对经济、贸易和交流以及中医药领域的合作产生重大影响。方法在ISO网站上检索ISO/ tc249标准,获取其标题、拟制定时间、目前阶段、范围、分类等信息,进行进一步总结。采用Gephi来描绘ISO/TC 249标准主题的共现网络图。结果截至2022年4月30日,ISO/TC 249共有116项标准,其中已发布标准81项,正在制定标准35项。修订后发布了两个退出标准,不计入总标准。自2014年第一个标准《一次性使用无菌针灸针》发布以来,已发布的标准数量不断增加。其中,17.24%(20/116)的标准处于评审阶段,56.03%(65/116)的标准处于公布阶段,3.45%(4/116)的标准处于批准阶段,5.17%(6/116)的标准处于调查阶段,3.45%(4/116)的标准处于委员会阶段,14.66%(17/116)的标准处于准备阶段。该药物的研究以116项标准为主,其在国际标准分类(ICS)中的分类比例达到49.54%。网络分析数据显示,除去介词、连词、代词等噪音数据后,使用频率最高的前5个词分别是“材料”、“根”、“要求”、“产品”和“系统”。此外,“系统”一词与“计算机化”、“编码”、“图像”、“语言”和“分析”共存;“需”字与“制”、“煮”、“制”、“料”共存;然而,“设备”一词与“脉冲”、“电子”、“皮肤”和“测量”共存。结论随着问题的日益多样化和复杂化,标准的制定也应面向多学科领域,培养复合型人才,特别是复方中药国际化标准化人才。多角度分析、制定、论证标准,符合行业不同学科的需求,增强标准的可用性和服务行业的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Chinese Medicine
Digital Chinese Medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
63 days
期刊最新文献
Distribution of traditional Chinese medicine pattern types and prognostic risk factors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): a systematic review and meta-analysis Research status and prospect of tongue image diagnosis analysis based on machine learning Thoughts on the system construction of digital Chinese medicine Differences in pulse manifestations at Cunkou based on simplified modeling of tactile sensing A novel deep learning based cloud service system for automated acupuncture needle counting: a strategy to improve acupuncture safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1