{"title":"Theoretical knowledge to eliminate terminological difficulties in the library science","authors":"E. Poltavskaya","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-7-13-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his several recent articles, Yury N. Stolyarov has formulated strategic tasks for the library science, in particular, to update urgently the definition of “the library” in official documents with the focus on library activities as a social good. In this connection, the author argues that theoretical knowledge has to be developed in librarianship to develop essentially unambiguous terminology. The system approach proves to be efficient for formulating key concepts in the library science. This approach eliminates mistakes when determining the integrity of elements making the system essence of the object under study. “The library” is a key c oncept o f t he l ibrary s cience; t hough i t h as b een a mbiguous f or t he l ong time with the extension and content changing according to historical ideas of this phenomenon. The abstract ideas of the library have been developing in a quite traditional way, i. e. from static (points, lines, planar geometric figures, 3-dimensional objects) to dynamic ones. The author supports the proposal to formulate different definitions of the library, i. e. for the professional and national standards, which would enable to describe the reality with the greater precision. Based on her theoretical studies, the author suggests updated definitions of: “the library” scientific category, the concepts of “the library as a social institution”, “personal library” and “the library as an organization; as only “the library as a social institution” is subject to regulation by normative documents. Differentiation of “the library” scientific concept into specific ones makes the foundation for formulating different definitions for the professionals and national standards.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-7-13-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In his several recent articles, Yury N. Stolyarov has formulated strategic tasks for the library science, in particular, to update urgently the definition of “the library” in official documents with the focus on library activities as a social good. In this connection, the author argues that theoretical knowledge has to be developed in librarianship to develop essentially unambiguous terminology. The system approach proves to be efficient for formulating key concepts in the library science. This approach eliminates mistakes when determining the integrity of elements making the system essence of the object under study. “The library” is a key c oncept o f t he l ibrary s cience; t hough i t h as b een a mbiguous f or t he l ong time with the extension and content changing according to historical ideas of this phenomenon. The abstract ideas of the library have been developing in a quite traditional way, i. e. from static (points, lines, planar geometric figures, 3-dimensional objects) to dynamic ones. The author supports the proposal to formulate different definitions of the library, i. e. for the professional and national standards, which would enable to describe the reality with the greater precision. Based on her theoretical studies, the author suggests updated definitions of: “the library” scientific category, the concepts of “the library as a social institution”, “personal library” and “the library as an organization; as only “the library as a social institution” is subject to regulation by normative documents. Differentiation of “the library” scientific concept into specific ones makes the foundation for formulating different definitions for the professionals and national standards.
Yury N. Stolyarov在他最近的几篇文章中提出了图书馆学的战略任务,特别是迫切需要更新官方文件中“图书馆”的定义,将重点放在图书馆活动作为一种社会利益上。在这方面,作者认为,理论知识必须在图书馆事业发展,以发展基本明确的术语。系统方法被证明是有效地形成图书馆学关键概念的方法。这种方法消除了在确定构成所研究对象的系统本质的要素完整性时的错误。“图书馆”是图书馆学的核心概念;尽管长期以来,这一现象一直是一个模糊的概念,其外延和内容也随着历史观念的变化而变化。图书馆的抽象概念一直在以一种相当传统的方式发展,即从静态(点、线、平面几何图形、三维物体)发展到动态。作者支持制定专业标准和国家标准对图书馆的不同定义的建议,这样可以更准确地描述现实。在理论研究的基础上,作者提出了更新的定义:“图书馆”的科学范畴,“图书馆作为社会机构”、“个人图书馆”和“图书馆作为组织”的概念;因为只有“作为社会机构的图书馆”才受到规范性文件的规制。将“图书馆”科学概念区分为具体概念,为专业人士和国家标准制定不同的定义奠定了基础。