Cybersecurity Capacity: Does It Matter?

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Policy Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0280
William H. Dutton, S. Creese, R. Shillair, Maria Bada
{"title":"Cybersecurity Capacity: Does It Matter?","authors":"William H. Dutton, S. Creese, R. Shillair, Maria Bada","doi":"10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY-NC-ND ABSTRACT National cybersecurity capacity building involves the development of managerial, technical, social, legal, policy, and regulatory initiatives by a growing ecology of actors to enhance the resilience of nations to cybersecurity breaches, cybercrime, and terrorism. Capacity building is therefore resource intensive, requiring attention across sectors of society, ranging from governments to Internet users. However, it is difficult to justify commitments to capacity building when the benefits of building national cybersecurity capacity are largely based on logical reasoning, limited case studies, anecdotal evidence, and expert opinion rather than systematic empirical evidence. To explore the value of capacity building, this article reports on the early phase of a systematic effort to bring together cross-national data from multiple sources to examine whether indicators related to the cybersecurity capacity of a nation help explain the experiences of Internet users—one of the final payoffs of cybersecurity capacity building.","PeriodicalId":55617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Policy","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY-NC-ND ABSTRACT National cybersecurity capacity building involves the development of managerial, technical, social, legal, policy, and regulatory initiatives by a growing ecology of actors to enhance the resilience of nations to cybersecurity breaches, cybercrime, and terrorism. Capacity building is therefore resource intensive, requiring attention across sectors of society, ranging from governments to Internet users. However, it is difficult to justify commitments to capacity building when the benefits of building national cybersecurity capacity are largely based on logical reasoning, limited case studies, anecdotal evidence, and expert opinion rather than systematic empirical evidence. To explore the value of capacity building, this article reports on the early phase of a systematic effort to bring together cross-national data from multiple sources to examine whether indicators related to the cybersecurity capacity of a nation help explain the experiences of Internet users—one of the final payoffs of cybersecurity capacity building.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络安全能力:重要吗?
摘要国家网络安全能力建设涉及管理、技术、社会、法律、政策和监管举措的发展,由越来越多的参与者参与,以增强国家对网络安全漏洞、网络犯罪和恐怖主义的应变能力。因此,能力建设是资源密集型的,需要从政府到互联网用户等社会各部门的关注。然而,当建设国家网络安全能力的好处主要基于逻辑推理、有限的案例研究、轶事证据和专家意见,而不是系统的经验证据时,很难证明能力建设的承诺是合理的。为了探索能力建设的价值,本文报告了一项系统工作的早期阶段,该工作汇集了来自多个来源的跨国数据,以检验与一个国家的网络安全能力相关的指标是否有助于解释互联网用户的体验——网络安全能力建设的最终回报之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Universal Access and Its Asymmetries: The Untold Story of the Last 200 Years Using a Digital Entertainment Tax to Strengthen Local Information Infrastructure in The United States: A Conceptual Exploration Access to the Internet and Declining Democracy in Venezuela Pandemic, Hoaxes and Information Security of Kazakhstan Research Handbook on Information Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1