Regulatory reform for diversified public utilities: For better or for worse?

Ronald R. Braeutigam
{"title":"Regulatory reform for diversified public utilities: For better or for worse?","authors":"Ronald R. Braeutigam","doi":"10.1016/0165-0572(92)90020-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines the difficulties of regulating public utilities which serve both noncompetitive and competitive markets. Problems with the administration of traditional rate of return regulation as utilities have diversified into competitive markets have led regulators to consider adopting alternative forms of regulation that allow the firm and the customers in noncompetitive markets to share in the economic benefits of production, including ‘price cap’ regulation. The article examines the efficacy of price caps as one possible form of regulatory bargain, both as a theoretical ideal and as they have been applied in practice. It also addresses explicitly the nature of another type of regulatory bargain designed to distribute net economic benefits to consumers and the firm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101080,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(92)90020-H","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016505729290020H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the difficulties of regulating public utilities which serve both noncompetitive and competitive markets. Problems with the administration of traditional rate of return regulation as utilities have diversified into competitive markets have led regulators to consider adopting alternative forms of regulation that allow the firm and the customers in noncompetitive markets to share in the economic benefits of production, including ‘price cap’ regulation. The article examines the efficacy of price caps as one possible form of regulatory bargain, both as a theoretical ideal and as they have been applied in practice. It also addresses explicitly the nature of another type of regulatory bargain designed to distribute net economic benefits to consumers and the firm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多元化公用事业监管改革:是好是坏?
本文考察了监管服务于非竞争性和竞争性市场的公用事业的困难。随着公用事业多元化进入竞争性市场,传统回报率监管的管理问题导致监管机构考虑采用其他监管形式,允许非竞争性市场中的公司和客户分享生产的经济利益,包括“价格上限”监管。本文考察了价格上限作为一种可能的监管交易形式的有效性,无论是作为理论理想还是在实践中应用。它还明确指出了另一种旨在将净经济利益分配给消费者和企业的监管交易的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capital recovery for the regulated firm under certainty and regulatory uncertainty The oil market and international agreements on CO2 emissions Land use with endogenous environmental degradation and conservation Announcement and call for papers Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1