Towards a conceptual framework of adaptivity in face-to-face-interaction: an interdisciplinary review of adaptivity concepts

Janneke van de Pol, Marije van Braak, H. Pennings, S. van Vondel, Henderien W. Steenbeek, Sanne F. Akkerman
{"title":"Towards a conceptual framework of adaptivity in face-to-face-interaction: an interdisciplinary review of adaptivity concepts","authors":"Janneke van de Pol, Marije van Braak, H. Pennings, S. van Vondel, Henderien W. Steenbeek, Sanne F. Akkerman","doi":"10.1080/23808985.2022.2130809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The pervasive phenomenon of adaptivity in face-to-face interaction is described inconsistently, using numerous concepts (e.g. alignment/attunement/complementarity/imitation/reciprocity/scaffolding/synchrony), impeding the streamlining of adaptivity research. We explored 33 adaptivity concepts and various adaptivity theories from different fields. We developed a theory-based conceptual framework consisting of two key dimensions. Relatedness refers to how people’s actions should relate to each other to be considered adaptive and is described in terms of sameness (e.g. both friendly), oppositeness (e.g. dominant/submissive), or specified attentiveness (dissimilar acts). Responsivity refers to the timing of people’s actions (sequential/simultaneous). The framework helps to understand what key elements adaptivity consists of. The framework can help transcending the concept and discipline level and examining and synthesizing research pertaining to adaptivity with similar dimensional characteristics.","PeriodicalId":36859,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the International Communication Association","volume":"192 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the International Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2130809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The pervasive phenomenon of adaptivity in face-to-face interaction is described inconsistently, using numerous concepts (e.g. alignment/attunement/complementarity/imitation/reciprocity/scaffolding/synchrony), impeding the streamlining of adaptivity research. We explored 33 adaptivity concepts and various adaptivity theories from different fields. We developed a theory-based conceptual framework consisting of two key dimensions. Relatedness refers to how people’s actions should relate to each other to be considered adaptive and is described in terms of sameness (e.g. both friendly), oppositeness (e.g. dominant/submissive), or specified attentiveness (dissimilar acts). Responsivity refers to the timing of people’s actions (sequential/simultaneous). The framework helps to understand what key elements adaptivity consists of. The framework can help transcending the concept and discipline level and examining and synthesizing research pertaining to adaptivity with similar dimensional characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向面对面互动中适应性的概念框架:适应性概念的跨学科回顾
摘要面对面互动中普遍存在的适应性现象描述不一致,使用了许多概念(如对齐/调谐/互补/模仿/互惠/脚手架/同步),阻碍了适应性研究的流线化。本文探讨了33个适应性概念和不同领域的适应性理论。我们开发了一个基于理论的概念框架,包括两个关键维度。相关性是指人们的行为如何相互关联才能被认为是适应性的,可以用相同(例如友好)、对立(例如主导/服从)或特定的注意力(不同的行为)来描述。反应性指的是人们行动的时机(顺序/同时)。该框架有助于理解适应性由哪些关键元素组成。该框架有助于超越概念和学科层面,考察和综合具有相似维度特征的适应性相关研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Four decades of biological measurement advancing mediated communication theory: a review of literature from 1980–2020 What is ‘Being There’? an ontology of the immersive experience Relational turbulence during family transitions: a lifespan perspective and roadmap for future research An enduring divide: revisiting the mass and family communication dichotomy and exploring paths of integration Mapping media literacy impact in the U.S.: a review of literature and call for equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1