Evaluation of Construction Materials Waste Disposal Methods using Multi Criteria Decision Analysis

H. Gökçekuş, Nivin Ghaboun, B. Uzun, D. Ozsahin
{"title":"Evaluation of Construction Materials Waste Disposal Methods using Multi Criteria Decision Analysis","authors":"H. Gökçekuş, Nivin Ghaboun, B. Uzun, D. Ozsahin","doi":"10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction industry is the most important sector that contributes to the economic growth of a nation. However materials waste resulting from construction activities represents a threat to the ecological system and affects the sustainability of the construction industry negatively. Consequently a reliable waste disposal method should be selected to avoid any adverse environmental and human impacts. There are many methods to discard materials waste such as landfills, incineration, recycling, reuse and reduction. Each method has its own features, characteristics and effects on environment and human health in addition the selection of the appropriate method depends mainly on the nature of the waste. The common and preferred method by construction companies is landfills, but this method affects environment and human health harmfully. The aim of this study is to evaluate waste disposal methods in terms of energy consumption, risk of pollution, practicability, quantity of waste, cost efficiency, favorability, effectiveness, quality in managing waste and environmental effects. The evaluation was made using Fuzzy Promethee which is the most well-known tool of Multi criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The analysis ranked reduction of materials waste as the best alternative followed by reuse and recycling according to the weights and the majority of criterias specified while the incineration ranked as fifth and landfills was ranked as the last alternative, which is not preferred for the environmental health.","PeriodicalId":6832,"journal":{"name":"2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)","volume":"292 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Construction industry is the most important sector that contributes to the economic growth of a nation. However materials waste resulting from construction activities represents a threat to the ecological system and affects the sustainability of the construction industry negatively. Consequently a reliable waste disposal method should be selected to avoid any adverse environmental and human impacts. There are many methods to discard materials waste such as landfills, incineration, recycling, reuse and reduction. Each method has its own features, characteristics and effects on environment and human health in addition the selection of the appropriate method depends mainly on the nature of the waste. The common and preferred method by construction companies is landfills, but this method affects environment and human health harmfully. The aim of this study is to evaluate waste disposal methods in terms of energy consumption, risk of pollution, practicability, quantity of waste, cost efficiency, favorability, effectiveness, quality in managing waste and environmental effects. The evaluation was made using Fuzzy Promethee which is the most well-known tool of Multi criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). The analysis ranked reduction of materials waste as the best alternative followed by reuse and recycling according to the weights and the majority of criterias specified while the incineration ranked as fifth and landfills was ranked as the last alternative, which is not preferred for the environmental health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多准则决策分析的建筑材料废弃物处理方法评价
建筑业是一个国家经济增长最重要的部门。然而,建筑活动产生的材料浪费对生态系统构成了威胁,并对建筑业的可持续性产生了负面影响。因此,应该选择一种可靠的废物处理方法,以避免任何不利的环境和人类影响。废弃材料的方法有很多,如填埋、焚烧、回收、再利用和减量。每种方法都有自己的特点、特点和对环境和人类健康的影响,此外,选择适当的方法主要取决于废物的性质。垃圾填埋是建筑公司常用和首选的方法,但这种方法对环境和人体健康都有危害。本研究的目的是在能源消耗、污染风险、实用性、废物数量、成本效率、有利性、有效性、废物管理质量和环境影响方面评估废物处理方法。采用多准则决策分析(MCDA)中最著名的模糊Promethee工具进行评价。根据重量和规定的大多数标准,分析将减少材料废物列为最佳替代方案,其次是再利用和再循环,而焚烧排在第五位,填埋排在最后,这对环境健康不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Numerical computing in engineering mathematics A Model for Solar Home System Assessment in Public Housing Projects in the United Arab Emirates A hybrid photovoltaic/solar chimney seawater desalination plant Comparative Study Investigating Compressed Natural Gas, Diesel, and Gasoline as Fuel for the Transportation Sector: A Case of UAE Impact of Urbanisation on Surface Temperature using Satellite and Ground Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1