Disputations from the Damaged City: Spike Lee’s If God Is Willing and da Creek Don’t Rise (2010) and the Taking Place of Civil Society in Post-Katrina New Orleans

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY Telos Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3817/1221197101
J. Fisher
{"title":"Disputations from the Damaged City: Spike Lee’s If God Is Willing and da Creek Don’t Rise (2010) and the Taking Place of Civil Society in Post-Katrina New Orleans","authors":"J. Fisher","doi":"10.3817/1221197101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Spike Lee’s celebrated documentary about Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath, When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts (2006), two of the most memorable interviewees recounting their experiences are denoted, somewhat curiously, as “cultural activists.” Although Lee is celebrated as one of the leading U.S. auteurs of the last thirty years—and, without a doubt, its most influential Black feature filmmaker—he considers his documentaries a key part of his oeuvre. Levees, for instance, garnered both numerous prizes and widespread acclaim for documenting the storm, its ambiguous context, and its devastating aftermath.1 In making its eponymous case that it was not the storm but the sadly predictable failure of the levees that devastated the city, the film weaves a broad, and colorful, social and political tapestry by mixing sundry cinematic elements: stock news footage; exterior, often shocking, shots of the city contemporary to the filmmaking (in 2005–6); and stylized interviews, some made on-site and some in front of bright pastel backgrounds that obscure the location of the interview.2 Tellingly, these stylized interviews do not always feature conventional experts like academic historians, scientists/engineers, or local politicians to play the familiar role of documentary’s tried and somewhat true talking heads. Rather, throughout, Lee also offers nonexperts (or nonconventional experts) who recount their experiences during and after the hurricane and subsequent flood. Often these subjects are designated as residents of this or that parish (a county like St. Bernard or Jefferson) or neighborhood (like the Lower Ninth Ward or Pontchartrain Park). But a good number carry the aforementioned title of cultural activist—an unusual moniker underscoring a number of facets of New Orleans, its multifarious municipal traditions, and its pluralistic polities.","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":"3 1","pages":"101 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3817/1221197101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Spike Lee’s celebrated documentary about Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath, When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts (2006), two of the most memorable interviewees recounting their experiences are denoted, somewhat curiously, as “cultural activists.” Although Lee is celebrated as one of the leading U.S. auteurs of the last thirty years—and, without a doubt, its most influential Black feature filmmaker—he considers his documentaries a key part of his oeuvre. Levees, for instance, garnered both numerous prizes and widespread acclaim for documenting the storm, its ambiguous context, and its devastating aftermath.1 In making its eponymous case that it was not the storm but the sadly predictable failure of the levees that devastated the city, the film weaves a broad, and colorful, social and political tapestry by mixing sundry cinematic elements: stock news footage; exterior, often shocking, shots of the city contemporary to the filmmaking (in 2005–6); and stylized interviews, some made on-site and some in front of bright pastel backgrounds that obscure the location of the interview.2 Tellingly, these stylized interviews do not always feature conventional experts like academic historians, scientists/engineers, or local politicians to play the familiar role of documentary’s tried and somewhat true talking heads. Rather, throughout, Lee also offers nonexperts (or nonconventional experts) who recount their experiences during and after the hurricane and subsequent flood. Often these subjects are designated as residents of this or that parish (a county like St. Bernard or Jefferson) or neighborhood (like the Lower Ninth Ward or Pontchartrain Park). But a good number carry the aforementioned title of cultural activist—an unusual moniker underscoring a number of facets of New Orleans, its multifarious municipal traditions, and its pluralistic polities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受损城市的争论:斯派克·李的《如果上帝愿意》和《河不涨》(2010)以及卡特里娜飓风后新奥尔良市民社会的发生
在斯派克·李关于卡特里娜飓风及其后果的著名纪录片《当大堤决堤:四幕安魂曲》(2006)中,两位最令人难忘的受访者讲述了他们的经历,有些奇怪的是,他们被称为“文化活动家”。虽然李安被誉为近三十年来美国最重要的导演之一,毫无疑问,他是美国最有影响力的黑人故事片导演,但他认为他的纪录片是他全部作品的关键部分。比如,《堤》就因为记录了这场风暴、它模糊的背景和它毁灭性的后果而获得了无数的奖项和广泛的赞誉这部电影以它的名字来说明,摧毁这座城市的不是风暴,而是可悲的可预见的堤坝的失败。通过混合各种电影元素,这部电影编织了一幅广泛而丰富多彩的社会和政治挂毯:常规新闻镜头;外部,往往是令人震惊的,当代城市拍摄的电影(2005 - 2006);还有程式化的面试,有些是在现场进行的,有些是在明亮的彩色背景前进行的,这样会模糊面试的地点值得注意的是,这些程式化的采访并不总是由传统的专家,如学术历史学家、科学家/工程师或当地政治家来扮演纪录片中久经考验的、多少有些真实的谈话领袖的角色。相反,在整个过程中,李还提供了非专家(或非传统专家)讲述他们在飓风和随后的洪水期间和之后的经历。这些主题通常被指定为这个或那个教区(如圣伯纳德或杰斐逊县)或社区(如下九区或庞恰特雷恩公园)的居民。但也有不少人拥有前面提到的文化活动家的头衔,这是一个不同寻常的绰号,强调了新奥尔良的许多方面,其多样的市政传统和多元化的政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telos
Telos Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The Early Christian Origins of Secularization Nationality of Food: Cultural Politics on the UNESCO List of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Food Museums Horizontality vs. Verticality: New Readings in the Understanding of Religion and the Organizing of Politics In Memoriam: Fred Siegel Islam and the Promotion of Human Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1