Validation of the Hebrew version of the questionnaire “know pain 50”

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL AIMS Medical Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3934/medsci.2022006
G. Eshel, Baruch Harash, maayan ben sasson, A. Minerbi, S. Vulfsons
{"title":"Validation of the Hebrew version of the questionnaire “know pain 50”","authors":"G. Eshel, Baruch Harash, maayan ben sasson, A. Minerbi, S. Vulfsons","doi":"10.3934/medsci.2022006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The “Know Pain 50” questionnaire, a well-known and validated questionnaire used to examine medical staff's knowledge in pain medicine, was translated and validated into Hebrew for Israeli medical staff. The questionnaire consists of 50 questions: the first five assess knowledge in pain medicine alone and the other 45 assess knowledge alongside attitudes and beliefs in many aspects of pain medicine. Background There is great importance in understanding the complexity of pain medicine for patients suffering from chronic pain. Many physicians in Israel report a lack of knowledge in many aspects of pain medicine and in particular proper evaluation of pain, and treatment of chronic pain. To the best of our knowledge, there are no valid and reliable questionnaires in Israel that assess physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding pain medicine. Therefore, validation of a Hebrew version of the “know pain 50” questionnaire is necessary. Methods A transcultural adaptation was performed. The Hebrew version of the questionnaire was given to 16 pain specialists, 40 family practitioners, and 41 medical interns. Family practitioners and medical interns were grouped and compared to pain specialists for analysis. Findings In the complete questionnaire alone and in all the different domains, pain specialists received higher scores (median = 3.5) than family practitioners + medical interns combined (median = 2.74), the group of family practitioners alone (median = 2.6), and the group of the medical interns alone (median = 2.9). (P-value < 0.01). Conclusions The validated Hebrew version of the “Know Pain 50” questionnaire was found suitable for the Israeli medical community. Thus, it is an appropriate tool for assessing different levels of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of Israeli medical teams in pain medicine.","PeriodicalId":43011,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/medsci.2022006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The “Know Pain 50” questionnaire, a well-known and validated questionnaire used to examine medical staff's knowledge in pain medicine, was translated and validated into Hebrew for Israeli medical staff. The questionnaire consists of 50 questions: the first five assess knowledge in pain medicine alone and the other 45 assess knowledge alongside attitudes and beliefs in many aspects of pain medicine. Background There is great importance in understanding the complexity of pain medicine for patients suffering from chronic pain. Many physicians in Israel report a lack of knowledge in many aspects of pain medicine and in particular proper evaluation of pain, and treatment of chronic pain. To the best of our knowledge, there are no valid and reliable questionnaires in Israel that assess physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding pain medicine. Therefore, validation of a Hebrew version of the “know pain 50” questionnaire is necessary. Methods A transcultural adaptation was performed. The Hebrew version of the questionnaire was given to 16 pain specialists, 40 family practitioners, and 41 medical interns. Family practitioners and medical interns were grouped and compared to pain specialists for analysis. Findings In the complete questionnaire alone and in all the different domains, pain specialists received higher scores (median = 3.5) than family practitioners + medical interns combined (median = 2.74), the group of family practitioners alone (median = 2.6), and the group of the medical interns alone (median = 2.9). (P-value < 0.01). Conclusions The validated Hebrew version of the “Know Pain 50” questionnaire was found suitable for the Israeli medical community. Thus, it is an appropriate tool for assessing different levels of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of Israeli medical teams in pain medicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希伯来语版问卷“知痛50”的验证
“了解疼痛50”问卷是一份众所周知的、经过验证的调查问卷,用于检查医务人员在疼痛医学方面的知识,该问卷被翻译成希伯来语并经过验证,供以色列医务人员使用。问卷由50个问题组成:前5个问题单独评估疼痛医学知识,其他45个问题评估知识以及对疼痛医学许多方面的态度和信念。背景了解慢性疼痛患者疼痛药物的复杂性是非常重要的。以色列的许多医生报告在疼痛医学的许多方面缺乏知识,特别是对疼痛的适当评估和慢性疼痛的治疗。据我们所知,在以色列没有有效和可靠的问卷来评估医生对疼痛药物的知识、态度和信念。因此,验证希伯来语版本的“知道痛苦50”问卷是必要的。方法进行跨文化适应。问卷的希伯来语版本发给了16名疼痛专家,40名家庭医生和41名医疗实习生。家庭医生和医学实习生被分组,并与疼痛专家进行比较分析。结果:在单独填写的问卷中,疼痛专科医生的得分(中位数= 3.5)高于家庭医生+医学实习生的组合(中位数= 2.74)、家庭医生组(中位数= 2.6)和医学实习生组(中位数= 2.9)。(p < 0.01)。结论经验证的希伯来语版“Know Pain 50”问卷适用于以色列医学界。因此,它是评估以色列医疗团队在疼痛医学方面不同程度的知识、态度和信念的适当工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Medical Science
AIMS Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol consumption and HIV disease prognosis among virally unsuppressed in Rural KwaZulu Natal, South Africa The correlation between obesity and other cardiovascular disease risk factors among adult patients attending a specialist clinic in Kumasi. Ghana Analysis of Caputo fractional-order model for COVID-19 with non-pharmaceuticals interventions and vaccine hesitancy Increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis in an Urban, United States, safety-net emergency department in the COVID-19 era Hydroxyurea and pyridostigmine repurposed for treating Covid-19 multi-systems dysfunctions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1