Left Ventricular Thrombosis: Current Perspective and Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

IF 0.3 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology Pub Date : 2023-01-08 DOI:10.20996/1819-6446-2022-12-10
A. Aga, A. Sokolova, D. Napalkov
{"title":"Left Ventricular Thrombosis: Current Perspective and Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants","authors":"A. Aga, A. Sokolova, D. Napalkov","doi":"10.20996/1819-6446-2022-12-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious risk factor for systemic embolism development. Despite the evident danger of this condition, current guidelines describe management of patients with this potentially fatal complication very briefly. LVT can complicate myocardial infarction where its incidence is around 10%, as well as various forms of cardiomyopathies and novel coronavirus infection. According to clinical guidelines vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) should be used as treatment of choice for thrombus resolution. However, experts point out that this therapy lacks necessary evidential base and bears certain difficulties because of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamical properties of VKAs. These drawbacks are absent in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the possibility of using which in LVT is being actively studied. As for now, published results of 3 randomised clinical trials have demonstrated similar safety and efficacy profiles of DOACs and VKAs. Similarly, the majority of retrospective cohort studies did not observe significant differences between two groups, where some of them have shown superiority of DOACs especially in terms of earlier thrombus resolution. Nevertheless, some studies have found DOACs ineffective and even potentially unsafe regarding systemic embolism. Existing data does not allow to form an unambiguous conclusion about the equivalence of DOACs and VKAs for LVT resolution. Large randomised clinical trials are needed to determine efficacy and safety of such treatment in these patients.","PeriodicalId":20812,"journal":{"name":"Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2022-12-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious risk factor for systemic embolism development. Despite the evident danger of this condition, current guidelines describe management of patients with this potentially fatal complication very briefly. LVT can complicate myocardial infarction where its incidence is around 10%, as well as various forms of cardiomyopathies and novel coronavirus infection. According to clinical guidelines vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) should be used as treatment of choice for thrombus resolution. However, experts point out that this therapy lacks necessary evidential base and bears certain difficulties because of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamical properties of VKAs. These drawbacks are absent in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the possibility of using which in LVT is being actively studied. As for now, published results of 3 randomised clinical trials have demonstrated similar safety and efficacy profiles of DOACs and VKAs. Similarly, the majority of retrospective cohort studies did not observe significant differences between two groups, where some of them have shown superiority of DOACs especially in terms of earlier thrombus resolution. Nevertheless, some studies have found DOACs ineffective and even potentially unsafe regarding systemic embolism. Existing data does not allow to form an unambiguous conclusion about the equivalence of DOACs and VKAs for LVT resolution. Large randomised clinical trials are needed to determine efficacy and safety of such treatment in these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左心室血栓:目前的观点和使用直接口服抗凝剂
左心室血栓(LVT)是系统性栓塞发展的严重危险因素。尽管这种情况有明显的危险,但目前的指南非常简单地描述了这种潜在致命并发症的患者管理。LVT可使心肌梗死复杂化,其发病率约为10%,以及各种形式的心肌病和新型冠状病毒感染。根据临床指南,维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)应作为血栓溶解的治疗选择。然而,专家指出,由于vka的药代动力学和药效学特性,这种治疗方法缺乏必要的证据基础,并且存在一定的困难。这些缺点在直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)中是不存在的,目前正在积极研究在LVT中使用的可能性。截至目前,已发表的3项随机临床试验结果显示doac和vka的安全性和有效性相似。同样,大多数回顾性队列研究没有观察到两组之间的显著差异,其中一些研究显示了DOACs的优势,特别是在早期血栓溶解方面。然而,一些研究发现DOACs对全身栓塞无效,甚至可能不安全。现有的数据不能对doac和vka在LVT分辨率上的等效性得出明确的结论。需要大型随机临床试验来确定这种治疗在这些患者中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology
Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary goals of the Journal are consolidation of information on scientific and practical achievements in pharmacotherapy and prevention of cardiovascular diseases and continuing education of cardiologists and internists. The scientific concept of the edition suggests the publication of information on current achievements in cardiology, the results of national and international clinical trials. The Journal publishes original articles on the results of clinical trials designed to study the effectiveness and safety of drugs, analysis of clinical practice and its compliance with national and international recommendations, expert s’ opinions on a wide range of cardiology issues, associated conditions and clinical pharmacology. There is a heading “Preventive cardiology and public health” in the Journal to stimulate research interest in this highly demanded area. Memories of the outstanding people in medicine including cardiology, which are of great interest to historians of medicine, are published in "Our Mentors” heading.
期刊最新文献
Patients with atrial fibrillation in outpatient practice: clinical characteristics and outcomes over a 10-year observation period (data from the REQUAZA AF registrу — Yaroslavl) Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: comparison with Type 1 Myocardial Infarction Efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension and stable coronary artery disease in combination with type 2 diabetes Pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease Changes of myocardial dysfunction and injury biomarkers over chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: difficulties in laboratory data interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1