Evaluation of the effects of cotton roll-biting on debonding pain: a split-mouth study

F. Çelebi
{"title":"Evaluation of the effects of cotton roll-biting on debonding pain: a split-mouth study","authors":"F. Çelebi","doi":"10.5937/sejodr8-28046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Debonding pain is an unpleasant sensation that is frequently encountered during debonding procedure. Aim of the study: To investigate the effectiveness of cotton roll-biting on pain caused by the debonding procedure. Materials and methods: 102 patients (61 females, 41 males) who were at the debonding stage in orthodontic treatment were included in the research. The study was planned using a split-mouth design: one side of the jaw was the study, and the other side was the control. The anxiety level of participants was measured before debonding. On the study side, debonding was performed while patients were biting a cotton roll. On the control side, debonding was implemented as a routine debonding procedure. Study and control sides were assigned differently in each successive patient. The debonding pain of each tooth was recorded using the Visual Analog Scale prepared separately for each tooth. Shapiro–Wilk and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. For both gender groups, patients were sequenced according to the average amount of pain per tooth. Subsequently, statistical analysis was repeated by using 50% of patients suffering more pain. Results: In the lower second premolar tooth, a statistically significant difference was detected. Pain scores were statistically higher in the study side for this tooth. No statistically significant differences were found for all other teeth. Conclusions: Cotton roll-biting has no alleviating effect on debonding pain. When debonding is performed gently using a squeezing action without applying torsional forces, additional pain relief methods are not required.","PeriodicalId":22042,"journal":{"name":"South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr8-28046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Debonding pain is an unpleasant sensation that is frequently encountered during debonding procedure. Aim of the study: To investigate the effectiveness of cotton roll-biting on pain caused by the debonding procedure. Materials and methods: 102 patients (61 females, 41 males) who were at the debonding stage in orthodontic treatment were included in the research. The study was planned using a split-mouth design: one side of the jaw was the study, and the other side was the control. The anxiety level of participants was measured before debonding. On the study side, debonding was performed while patients were biting a cotton roll. On the control side, debonding was implemented as a routine debonding procedure. Study and control sides were assigned differently in each successive patient. The debonding pain of each tooth was recorded using the Visual Analog Scale prepared separately for each tooth. Shapiro–Wilk and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. For both gender groups, patients were sequenced according to the average amount of pain per tooth. Subsequently, statistical analysis was repeated by using 50% of patients suffering more pain. Results: In the lower second premolar tooth, a statistically significant difference was detected. Pain scores were statistically higher in the study side for this tooth. No statistically significant differences were found for all other teeth. Conclusions: Cotton roll-biting has no alleviating effect on debonding pain. When debonding is performed gently using a squeezing action without applying torsional forces, additional pain relief methods are not required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咬棉球对脱粘痛的影响评价:一项裂口研究
简介:脱粘疼痛是在脱粘过程中经常遇到的一种不愉快的感觉。目的:探讨棉球咬伤对脱粘术后疼痛的治疗效果。材料与方法:选取正畸治疗中处于脱粘期的102例患者,其中女性61例,男性41例。这项研究计划采用开口设计:一侧下巴是研究对象,另一侧是对照组。参与者的焦虑水平是在脱粘之前测量的。在研究方面,在患者咬棉花卷时进行脱粘。在控制侧,脱粘作为常规脱粘程序实施。在每个连续的患者中,研究组和对照组的分配是不同的。使用分别为每颗牙齿准备的视觉模拟量表记录每颗牙齿的脱粘疼痛。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。对于男女两组,患者根据每颗牙齿的平均疼痛程度进行排序。随后,通过使用50%的患者遭受更多的疼痛来重复统计分析。结果:下第二前磨牙两组差异有统计学意义。这颗牙的疼痛评分在统计学上更高。在其他所有牙齿中没有发现统计学上的显著差异。结论:咬棉对脱粘痛无缓解作用。当轻轻使用挤压动作而不施加扭转力进行剥离时,不需要额外的疼痛缓解方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Skeletal effects of mini-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the sagittal dimensions of the maxilla an in-vivo cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study Management of Class II Division 1 Subdivision malocclusion using unilateral bicuspid extractions and fixed functional appliance: A Two Year Follow-Up Herbst Appliance palatally anchored in the treatment of dental class II malocclusion Bullying and malocclusion in adolescence: a case report Assessment of facial landmarks for bone asymmetry in geometric morphometric studies: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1