La necesidad de un pensamiento judicial complejo en las decisiones sobre personas indígenas privadas de libertad

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Derecho y Ciencias Sociales Pub Date : 2020-04-09 DOI:10.24215/18522971E068
María José Jara Leiva
{"title":"La necesidad de un pensamiento judicial complejo en las decisiones sobre personas indígenas privadas de libertad","authors":"María José Jara Leiva","doi":"10.24215/18522971E068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will offer a reflection on the paradigm of complexity, developed mainly by Edgar Morin, as opposed to the simplifying vision of reality, typical of the discourse of modernity and inherited by our legal systems. There will be settled the need to adopt this paradigm by legal operators, responsible for applying the legal rules on the basis of their conception of reality, especially judges. This need becomes imperative in multicultural societies, such as Chile, and in aspects especially sensitive and prone to the neglect of cultural diversity, such as prisons. In particular, it will be considered that prison is a highly assimilationist space, in which indigenous people are specially affected by a simplified vision of reality which does not meet their special needs during deprivation of liberty. The analysis of three illustrative judgements in this area will highlight the need for conceiving reality from diversity. Finally, some proposals will be made.","PeriodicalId":40988,"journal":{"name":"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho y Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971E068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will offer a reflection on the paradigm of complexity, developed mainly by Edgar Morin, as opposed to the simplifying vision of reality, typical of the discourse of modernity and inherited by our legal systems. There will be settled the need to adopt this paradigm by legal operators, responsible for applying the legal rules on the basis of their conception of reality, especially judges. This need becomes imperative in multicultural societies, such as Chile, and in aspects especially sensitive and prone to the neglect of cultural diversity, such as prisons. In particular, it will be considered that prison is a highly assimilationist space, in which indigenous people are specially affected by a simplified vision of reality which does not meet their special needs during deprivation of liberty. The analysis of three illustrative judgements in this area will highlight the need for conceiving reality from diversity. Finally, some proposals will be made.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在关于被剥夺自由的土著人民的决定中需要复杂的司法思考
本文将对主要由埃德加·莫林(Edgar Morin)提出的复杂性范式进行反思,而不是对现实的简化看法,这是现代性话语的典型特征,并被我们的法律体系所继承。将解决由负责根据其现实概念适用法律规则的法律执行者,特别是法官采用这种范式的需要。在诸如智利这样的多文化社会中,以及在诸如监狱等特别敏感和容易忽视文化多样性的方面,这种需要变得十分迫切。特别要指出的是,监狱是一个高度同化的空间,在那里,土著人民特别受到对现实简单化的看法的影响,这种看法不能满足他们在被剥夺自由期间的特殊需要。对这一领域的三个说明性判断的分析将突出从多样性中构思现实的必要性。最后,提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
transformaciones en la legislación laboral durante el ciclo kirchnerista en Argentina: gobierno, CGT y empresarios en el ámbito de los debates parlamentarios y legislativos (2003-2015) Negociar los derechos de las infancias Derecho territorial indígena y brecha de implementación en el Neuquén del siglo XXI caso Dobbs y el futuro de la autodeterminación personal en Estados Unidos Conversaciones entre la práctica psicológica y jurídica de la Adopción: desafíos en la escucha e intervención
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1