Social network analysis and public policy: what’s new?

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-28 DOI:10.1080/17516234.2021.1996869
Wei Zhang, Mingyang Zhang, Ling Yuan, Fengchun Fan
{"title":"Social network analysis and public policy: what’s new?","authors":"Wei Zhang, Mingyang Zhang, Ling Yuan, Fengchun Fan","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2021.1996869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As a mature paradigm of network analysis, social network analysis (SNA) is suitable for exploring complicated and interactive relationships in policy research and is of great significance to the innovation and development of public policy research. In this paper, 45 typical articles published in high-ranking journals in the field of public administration were analysed using co-word analysis and qualitative analysis. The application of SNA in public policy studies, including research methods, analytic tools, and basic concepts of network analysis, were systematically reviewed. UCINET software was used to visualize the knowledge network of research topics. The main research topics were classified into five categories: agenda setting, policy network, advocacy coalition, policy learning and diffusion, policy implementation. Finally, this article suggests that network analysis in public administration should be thoroughly re-examined; in particular, scholars should consider the benefits of SNA for public policy research. In the application of SNA to public policy research, it is necessary to broaden the study perspective and scope, further strengthen interdisciplinary theoretical interaction and theoretical innovation, and take advantage of big data and other new technological tools that can develop giant network analysis for public policy.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":"14 1","pages":"115 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1996869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a mature paradigm of network analysis, social network analysis (SNA) is suitable for exploring complicated and interactive relationships in policy research and is of great significance to the innovation and development of public policy research. In this paper, 45 typical articles published in high-ranking journals in the field of public administration were analysed using co-word analysis and qualitative analysis. The application of SNA in public policy studies, including research methods, analytic tools, and basic concepts of network analysis, were systematically reviewed. UCINET software was used to visualize the knowledge network of research topics. The main research topics were classified into five categories: agenda setting, policy network, advocacy coalition, policy learning and diffusion, policy implementation. Finally, this article suggests that network analysis in public administration should be thoroughly re-examined; in particular, scholars should consider the benefits of SNA for public policy research. In the application of SNA to public policy research, it is necessary to broaden the study perspective and scope, further strengthen interdisciplinary theoretical interaction and theoretical innovation, and take advantage of big data and other new technological tools that can develop giant network analysis for public policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会网络分析和公共政策:有什么新鲜事吗?
社会网络分析(social network analysis, SNA)作为一种成熟的网络分析范式,适用于探索政策研究中复杂、互动的关系,对公共政策研究的创新与发展具有重要意义。本文采用共词分析和定性分析相结合的方法,对发表在公共管理领域高级期刊上的45篇典型论文进行了分析。本文系统评述了SNA在公共政策研究中的应用,包括研究方法、分析工具和网络分析的基本概念。采用UCINET软件对研究课题的知识网络进行可视化。主要研究课题分为五类:议程设置、政策网络、倡导联盟、政策学习与传播、政策实施。最后,本文建议对公共行政中的网络分析进行彻底的重新审视;特别是,学者们应该考虑国民核算体系对公共政策研究的好处。在将SNA应用于公共政策研究中,需要拓宽研究视角和范围,进一步加强跨学科的理论互动和理论创新,利用大数据等新的技术工具,为公共政策开发巨网络分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The effect of incentives and procedure simplification in policy implementation: evidence from a survey experiment on waste sorting Situated usage of generative AI in policy education: implications for teaching, learning, and research Scaling up policy entrepreneurship strategies from the local to the national level: the unlikely rise of basic income from agenda universe to decision agenda Unveiling the impact of policy entrepreneurs on South Korea’s social economy: a media analysis Digital regulation, enforcement attitudes, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats during a pandemic emergency: an experimental study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1