Linguistic Silence and the Alienation of Female Characters in Ulysses and The Blind Owl

IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC Primerjalna Knjizevnost Pub Date : 2020-11-08 DOI:10.3986/pkn.v43.i3.10
Maryam Najafibabanazar
{"title":"Linguistic Silence and the Alienation of Female Characters in Ulysses and The Blind Owl","authors":"Maryam Najafibabanazar","doi":"10.3986/pkn.v43.i3.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to demonstrate how female characters in Ulysses and The Blind Owl are deprived of full means of communication and expression. The connection with the concern with alienation in these two novels is that it is in the representation of female language that they show how characters-female characters and by extension women in general-are alienated from and marginalized by the masculine voices of the novels’ narrators and focalizers. It is noticeable that the narrative style of Ulysses and The Blind Owl, although very innovative and experimental, still allocates almost no space to female voices and language, with the major exception of Molly Bloom’s interior monologue. With the benefit of more recent perspectives, Molly’s narrative can be read as deriving in some ways (the lack of punctuation being one major indication) from the semiotic and subverting the established discipline of language use (the symbolic), thus, as an example of écriture féminine.","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/pkn.v43.i3.10","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article intends to demonstrate how female characters in Ulysses and The Blind Owl are deprived of full means of communication and expression. The connection with the concern with alienation in these two novels is that it is in the representation of female language that they show how characters-female characters and by extension women in general-are alienated from and marginalized by the masculine voices of the novels’ narrators and focalizers. It is noticeable that the narrative style of Ulysses and The Blind Owl, although very innovative and experimental, still allocates almost no space to female voices and language, with the major exception of Molly Bloom’s interior monologue. With the benefit of more recent perspectives, Molly’s narrative can be read as deriving in some ways (the lack of punctuation being one major indication) from the semiotic and subverting the established discipline of language use (the symbolic), thus, as an example of écriture féminine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言沉默与《尤利西斯》和《盲枭》中女性角色的异化
本文旨在论证《尤利西斯》和《盲枭》中的女性角色是如何被剥夺了充分的交流和表达手段的。这两部小说中对异化的关注的联系是通过对女性语言的表现,它们展示了角色——女性角色以及一般的女性是如何被小说叙述者和聚焦者的男性声音所疏远和边缘化的。值得注意的是,《尤利西斯》和《盲枭》的叙事风格虽然很有创新性和实验性,但除了莫莉·布鲁姆的内心独白外,几乎没有给女性的声音和语言留出空间。从最近的观点来看,莫利的叙述可以被解读为在某些方面(标点的缺失是一个主要的迹象)源于符号学,颠覆了既定的语言使用规则(符号),因此,作为一个典型的文质化的文质化的文质化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Moč odsotnega: eluzivnost resničnosti v dveh Antigonah »Nič drugega kot nič«: negativna teopolitika Sofoklove Antigone O veličini in dostojanstvu žrtve: antropološki nauk Sofoklove Antigone Svetovna primerjalna književnost The Concretization of the Literary Work of Art: Elements for a Comparison between Roman Ingarden and Wolfgang Iser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1