Vinicius Bergmann Martins, Fabrício Rosa Amorim, Marcio Augusto Reolon Schmidt, Luciene Stamato Delazari
{"title":"Study about the appropriate number of participants in map user studies","authors":"Vinicius Bergmann Martins, Fabrício Rosa Amorim, Marcio Augusto Reolon Schmidt, Luciene Stamato Delazari","doi":"10.1080/23729333.2022.2163142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The minimum and the adequate number of participants in experiments with maps can vary significantly according to the characteristics of the participants, the maps, and especially the test’s purpose. In this sense, the estimation of the adequate number of participants employed in carrying out tests involving map users bases the problem of this research. The study’s hypothesis presupposes that it is possible to establish the number of participants for each group of methods of experiments with similar characteristics that group the tests. To this end, to compare terms found in the Web of Science database with those informed in the title, abstract, introduction, and methodology of 200 scientific articles published in the area of cartography, whose subject is related to map users, the research performed an analytical review of the works. As a result, the analysis made it possible to select 85 publications, such as adequacy to the subject of study, according to the methods used. The results obtained from the research make it possible to define the number of participants according to the purpose of the applied test when evaluating maps.","PeriodicalId":36401,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cartography","volume":"51 1","pages":"196 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cartography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2022.2163142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT The minimum and the adequate number of participants in experiments with maps can vary significantly according to the characteristics of the participants, the maps, and especially the test’s purpose. In this sense, the estimation of the adequate number of participants employed in carrying out tests involving map users bases the problem of this research. The study’s hypothesis presupposes that it is possible to establish the number of participants for each group of methods of experiments with similar characteristics that group the tests. To this end, to compare terms found in the Web of Science database with those informed in the title, abstract, introduction, and methodology of 200 scientific articles published in the area of cartography, whose subject is related to map users, the research performed an analytical review of the works. As a result, the analysis made it possible to select 85 publications, such as adequacy to the subject of study, according to the methods used. The results obtained from the research make it possible to define the number of participants according to the purpose of the applied test when evaluating maps.
根据参与者的特点、地图,尤其是测试目的的不同,地图实验中最小和足够的参与者人数可能会有很大的不同。从这个意义上说,估计在进行涉及地图用户的测试时雇用的足够人数是本研究的问题的基础。该研究的假设前提是,有可能为每组具有相似特征的实验方法确定参与者的数量。为此,为了将Web of Science数据库中的术语与发表在与地图使用者相关的制图领域的200篇科学论文的标题、摘要、引言和方法中的术语进行比较,研究人员对这些作品进行了分析性审查。因此,根据所使用的方法,分析可以选择85种出版物,例如对研究主题的适当性。从研究中获得的结果使得在评估地图时根据应用测试的目的来定义参与者的数量成为可能。