Political Cycles in Latin America: More Evidence on the Brazilian Economy

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Latin American Economic Review Pub Date : 2021-11-04 DOI:10.47872/laer.v30.28
Celso J. Costa Junior, Alejandro C. García-Cintado, M. Hidalgo-Pérez
{"title":"Political Cycles in Latin America: More Evidence on the Brazilian Economy","authors":"Celso J. Costa Junior, Alejandro C. García-Cintado, M. Hidalgo-Pérez","doi":"10.47872/laer.v30.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to shed additional light on the existence of opportunistic and partisan political-business cycles in the Brazilian economy over the 1996-2016 period. To that end, it relies on two different approaches: (I) an Oaxaca model in the spirit of Blinder and Watson (2016); and (II) a DSGE model where fiscal and monetary policies are treated as political- regime dependent (Milani, 2010). By and large, our results from both exercises show that there existed an opportunistic behavior by all the governments studied as regards fiscal policy, and that political ideology played a role in shaping macroeconomic policies in some of the administrations that ran the country within the time span considered. Specifically, as our DSGE exercise illustrates, President Dilma Rouseff’s fiscal management differed significantly from previous governments’. In ad¬dition, we do not find any evidence of political business cycle of any type when it comes to monetary policy, in line with what the consensus in this literature states for the case of Brazil.","PeriodicalId":43785,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Economic Review","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47872/laer.v30.28","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to shed additional light on the existence of opportunistic and partisan political-business cycles in the Brazilian economy over the 1996-2016 period. To that end, it relies on two different approaches: (I) an Oaxaca model in the spirit of Blinder and Watson (2016); and (II) a DSGE model where fiscal and monetary policies are treated as political- regime dependent (Milani, 2010). By and large, our results from both exercises show that there existed an opportunistic behavior by all the governments studied as regards fiscal policy, and that political ideology played a role in shaping macroeconomic policies in some of the administrations that ran the country within the time span considered. Specifically, as our DSGE exercise illustrates, President Dilma Rouseff’s fiscal management differed significantly from previous governments’. In ad¬dition, we do not find any evidence of political business cycle of any type when it comes to monetary policy, in line with what the consensus in this literature states for the case of Brazil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁美洲的政治周期:更多关于巴西经济的证据
本文旨在进一步阐明1996-2016年期间巴西经济中存在的机会主义和党派政治-商业周期。为此,它依赖于两种不同的方法:(I)基于Blinder and Watson(2016)精神的瓦哈卡模式;(II) DSGE模型,其中财政和货币政策被视为依赖于政治制度(Milani, 2010)。总的来说,我们的两个练习的结果都表明,在财政政策方面,所有被研究的政府都存在机会主义行为,而且在所考虑的时间跨度内,政治意识形态在塑造一些管理国家的政府的宏观经济政策方面发挥了作用。具体而言,正如我们的DSGE演习所显示的那样,总统迪尔玛•罗塞夫(Dilma rousseff)的财政管理与前几届政府有很大不同。此外,在货币政策方面,我们没有发现任何类型的政治商业周期的证据,这与本文献中对巴西情况的共识一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Latin American Economic Review aims to be the leading general interest journal on topics relevant to Latin America. The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and quantitative papers on economic, social and political-economy issues with a regional focus. Articles presenting new data bases or describing structural reforms within a rigorous theoretical framework will also be considered. A few (illustrative) examples of topics that may be of special interest to this journal include: inflation, informal sector, corruption, crime, drug policy, unions, social exclusion, price controls, energy and environmental policy, natural resources, and technology transfer.
期刊最新文献
Size-Dependent Gender Gaps in Entrepreneurship: The Case of Chile* What effect does public and private capital have on income inequality? The case of the Latin America and Caribbean region Automation and the jobs of young workers Uncovering the wage differential between formal and informal jobs: Analysis from the Colombian Caribbean region Socioeconomic Effects of COVID-19 in Mexico: A Multisectoral Approach and Policy Options
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1