Valoración de los indicadores de calidad de ASEBIR y Consenso de Viena para el laboratorio de embriología: opinión de los usuarios

Miriam Iglesias , Mª Luisa López-Regalado , Irene Molina , Luis Martínez-Granados , María Serrano , Carla Olmedo , Empar Ferrer , Alba Mauri , Ernesto Veiga , Nereida Ortiz , José A. Castilla , Grupo Interés de Calidad de ASEBIR (GiCa-ASEBIR)
{"title":"Valoración de los indicadores de calidad de ASEBIR y Consenso de Viena para el laboratorio de embriología: opinión de los usuarios","authors":"Miriam Iglesias ,&nbsp;Mª Luisa López-Regalado ,&nbsp;Irene Molina ,&nbsp;Luis Martínez-Granados ,&nbsp;María Serrano ,&nbsp;Carla Olmedo ,&nbsp;Empar Ferrer ,&nbsp;Alba Mauri ,&nbsp;Ernesto Veiga ,&nbsp;Nereida Ortiz ,&nbsp;José A. Castilla ,&nbsp;Grupo Interés de Calidad de ASEBIR (GiCa-ASEBIR)","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the publication of the standard UNE 179007:2013, quality indicators (QIs) for the Assisted Human Reproduction Laboratory (AHRL) were standardised. Subsequently, in 2017 a committee of experts from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine published quality indicators for the Embryology Laboratory under the Vienna Consensus (VC). This work seeks to know the opinion of clinical embryologists on the UNE 179007:2013 and CV ICs, assessing their usefulness and the possible need to introduce new ICs.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A survey were developed and sent to potential participants through the ASEBIR website, with access from July 2018 to April 2019. In this survey, participants were asked to evaluate the CIs of UNE 179007:2013, and to express their opinion on the usefulness of introducing new indicators that are not currently being used. In addition, twelve of the CIs assessed in the CV and their proposed specifications were evaluated in the survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-eight participants from Assisted Reproduction centres responded to the survey. Of these, 87.5% indicated that they use CIs in their daily practice. Only 29% found the current IC of «percentage of progressive motile sperm recovery»useful. Sixty-one percent of the centres proposed replacing it with «percentage of motile sperm after EMR» without referring to the initial values. Regarding the incorporation of new indicators, the most voted CIs were «percentage of eSET» (96% in favour) and «percentage of embryos transferred». Most of the CIs proposed in the CV are positively valued by the respondents, who are in favour of their use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results support an update of the UNE 179007:2013 QIs, both improving some of the current ones and incorporating new QIs resulting from the QC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932021000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

With the publication of the standard UNE 179007:2013, quality indicators (QIs) for the Assisted Human Reproduction Laboratory (AHRL) were standardised. Subsequently, in 2017 a committee of experts from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine published quality indicators for the Embryology Laboratory under the Vienna Consensus (VC). This work seeks to know the opinion of clinical embryologists on the UNE 179007:2013 and CV ICs, assessing their usefulness and the possible need to introduce new ICs.

Material and methods

A survey were developed and sent to potential participants through the ASEBIR website, with access from July 2018 to April 2019. In this survey, participants were asked to evaluate the CIs of UNE 179007:2013, and to express their opinion on the usefulness of introducing new indicators that are not currently being used. In addition, twelve of the CIs assessed in the CV and their proposed specifications were evaluated in the survey.

Results

Twenty-eight participants from Assisted Reproduction centres responded to the survey. Of these, 87.5% indicated that they use CIs in their daily practice. Only 29% found the current IC of «percentage of progressive motile sperm recovery»useful. Sixty-one percent of the centres proposed replacing it with «percentage of motile sperm after EMR» without referring to the initial values. Regarding the incorporation of new indicators, the most voted CIs were «percentage of eSET» (96% in favour) and «percentage of embryos transferred». Most of the CIs proposed in the CV are positively valued by the respondents, who are in favour of their use.

Conclusion

Our results support an update of the UNE 179007:2013 QIs, both improving some of the current ones and incorporating new QIs resulting from the QC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胚胎学实验室ASEBIR和维也纳共识质量指标评估:用户意见
随着标准UNE 179007:2013的发布,辅助人类生殖实验室(AHRL)的质量指标(QIs)被标准化。随后,2017年,由欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)和生殖医学阿尔法科学家组成的专家委员会根据维也纳共识(VC)发布了胚胎学实验室的质量指标。这项工作旨在了解临床胚胎学家对UNE 179007:2013和CV ic的意见,评估它们的有用性和引入新ic的可能需要。材料和方法一份调查问卷于2018年7月至2019年4月期间通过ASEBIR网站发送给潜在参与者。在这项调查中,参与者被要求评估UNE 179007:2013的ci,并表达他们对引入目前尚未使用的新指标的有用性的意见。此外,调查还对CV中评估的12个ci及其拟议规格进行了评估。结果来自辅助生殖中心的28名参与者回应了调查。其中,87.5%的人表示他们在日常实践中使用ci。只有29%的人认为目前的IC“渐进式活动精子恢复百分比”有用。61%的中心建议在不参考初始值的情况下,用“EMR后活动精子的百分比”来取代它。关于新指标的纳入,投票最多的ci是“eSET的百分比”(96%赞成)和“胚胎移植的百分比”。受访者对简历中所建议的大部分“个人资料中心”都给予正面评价,并赞成使用。结论:我们的结果支持UNE 179007:2013质量体系的更新,既改进了一些现有的质量体系,又纳入了由质量控制产生的新质量体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extended embryo culture up to 14 days Impact of administration route on serum progesterone levels in women undergoing artificial endometrial preparation Efecto de la abstinencia sexual masculina en los resultados reproductivos Sperm DNA fragmentation and microfluidics: A new era in human sperm selection Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en el laboratorio de reproducción asistida. Trabajo de revisión
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1