Investigating the effect of the educational program in prospective of the principles of the case based discussion method in the microbiology clerkship of laboratory science students

M. Sadeh, F. Keshmiri, A. Mansouri, S. Amirpour Banadaki, M. Jahanmehr
{"title":"Investigating the effect of the educational program in prospective of the principles of the case based discussion method in the microbiology clerkship of laboratory science students","authors":"M. Sadeh, F. Keshmiri, A. Mansouri, S. Amirpour Banadaki, M. Jahanmehr","doi":"10.18502/jmed.v17i3.11296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Clerkship in field is one of the important educational programs in the field of laboratory sciences and providing opportunities for students to learn in clerkship, improved the quality of health services. The aim of this study was to design a structured microbiology clerkship program from the perspective of case based discussion method among laboratory science students. \nMethods: This was a single-group intervention study. The participants were from the field of laboratory sciences who participated in clerkship courses (99 participats). Educational intervention based on case-based discussion was designed as a formative evaluation method. Learners' performance was evaluated using a checklist in the stationary test and the students’ satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential tests. \nResults: The students' learning scores after the intervention were in desirable level. The highest learning score related to blood culture evaluation was 8.04±1.54 and the lowest score related to wound culture evaluation was 6.26±1.78. There was no significant difference between the satisfaction scores of the course and the performance evaluation scores of students according to academic year. But the performance of senior year students was significantly better and the students’ satisfaction scores were significantly high and at a good level. \nConclusion: Using the discussion-based teaching method in the clerkship course increased the students' learning and this method can be effective in increasing the skills and learning of the trainees in the field. It is suggested the case based discussion was used in the instructional design of clerkship courses.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v17i3.11296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clerkship in field is one of the important educational programs in the field of laboratory sciences and providing opportunities for students to learn in clerkship, improved the quality of health services. The aim of this study was to design a structured microbiology clerkship program from the perspective of case based discussion method among laboratory science students. Methods: This was a single-group intervention study. The participants were from the field of laboratory sciences who participated in clerkship courses (99 participats). Educational intervention based on case-based discussion was designed as a formative evaluation method. Learners' performance was evaluated using a checklist in the stationary test and the students’ satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential tests. Results: The students' learning scores after the intervention were in desirable level. The highest learning score related to blood culture evaluation was 8.04±1.54 and the lowest score related to wound culture evaluation was 6.26±1.78. There was no significant difference between the satisfaction scores of the course and the performance evaluation scores of students according to academic year. But the performance of senior year students was significantly better and the students’ satisfaction scores were significantly high and at a good level. Conclusion: Using the discussion-based teaching method in the clerkship course increased the students' learning and this method can be effective in increasing the skills and learning of the trainees in the field. It is suggested the case based discussion was used in the instructional design of clerkship courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从案例讨论法的原则出发,探讨了实验理科学生微生物学见习教学方案的效果
导读:实习实习是实验室科学领域的重要教育项目之一,为学生提供实习学习的机会,提高了卫生服务质量。摘要本研究旨在以案例讨论的方式,为实验室理科学生设计一个结构化的微生物学实习计划。方法:单组干预研究。参与者来自实验室科学领域,他们参加了见习课程(99名参与者)。基于案例讨论的教育干预是一种形成性评价方法。采用平稳性测验中的检查表评估学习者的表现,并采用问卷调查评估学生的满意度。使用描述性和推断性检验对数据进行分析。结果:干预后学生的学习成绩处于理想水平。与血培养评价相关的学习得分最高为8.04±1.54分,与伤口培养评价相关的学习得分最低为6.26±1.78分。学生对课程的满意度得分与各学年的绩效评估得分无显著差异。但高三学生的表现明显更好,学生的满意度得分显著高且处于良好水平。结论:在见习课程中采用讨论式教学法,能提高学员的学习效果,能有效提高见习学员的技能和学习能力。建议在实习课程的教学设计中采用案例讨论的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Game-Based Learning for Soft Skills Using the Peer Learning Method in the E-learning Process: Creating a Support-Motivational Mechanism for the Parasitology MS Students in Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd E-learning Quality Assessment Indicators: A Narrative Review ChatGPT in writing scientific articles: friend or foe? Explaining Medical Students' Experiences of the Challenges of Clinical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Qualitative Content Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1