Redetermination of Mass Fractions of Three Halogens (Cl, Br, I) for Seventeen USGS Geochemical Reference Materials

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1111/ggr.12516
Mitsuru Ebihara, Naoki Shirai, Shun Sekimoto
{"title":"Redetermination of Mass Fractions of Three Halogens (Cl, Br, I) for Seventeen USGS Geochemical Reference Materials","authors":"Mitsuru Ebihara,&nbsp;Naoki Shirai,&nbsp;Shun Sekimoto","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mass fractions of Cl, Br and I were obtained by radiochemical neutron activation analysis (RNAA) of seventeen USGS geochemical reference materials (RMs), for which we had published halogen contents in GGR (Sekimoto and Ebihara 2017). Except for three RMs, 100 mg to &gt; 300 mg of each powder material was used for a single analysis. After 10 min of neutron irradiation, a rapid radiochemical purification procedure was performed. Chemical yields were determined by the reactivation method. Each RM was analysed multiple times and consistent values were obtained for each element. Of the seventeen RMs, CLB-1, DGPM-1 and QLO-1a were also analysed by INAA. The INAA and RNAA results for CLB-1 and DGPM-1agree within 4%, implying that RNAA values obtained in this study are reliable. Compared with the 2017 data, the Cl and Br values obtained in this study were consistent, but the I values were 1/4 to 1/8 lower for all samples. It is concluded that the quantitative values of Cl and Br published in GGR in 2017 are reliable, while the I values are incorrect. Therefore, it is recommended that the I contents in the USGS RMs determined in this study be substituted in place of previous values.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"47 4","pages":"931-944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mass fractions of Cl, Br and I were obtained by radiochemical neutron activation analysis (RNAA) of seventeen USGS geochemical reference materials (RMs), for which we had published halogen contents in GGR (Sekimoto and Ebihara 2017). Except for three RMs, 100 mg to > 300 mg of each powder material was used for a single analysis. After 10 min of neutron irradiation, a rapid radiochemical purification procedure was performed. Chemical yields were determined by the reactivation method. Each RM was analysed multiple times and consistent values were obtained for each element. Of the seventeen RMs, CLB-1, DGPM-1 and QLO-1a were also analysed by INAA. The INAA and RNAA results for CLB-1 and DGPM-1agree within 4%, implying that RNAA values obtained in this study are reliable. Compared with the 2017 data, the Cl and Br values obtained in this study were consistent, but the I values were 1/4 to 1/8 lower for all samples. It is concluded that the quantitative values of Cl and Br published in GGR in 2017 are reliable, while the I values are incorrect. Therefore, it is recommended that the I contents in the USGS RMs determined in this study be substituted in place of previous values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新测定十七种 USGS 地球化学参考材料中三种卤素(Cl、Br、I)的质量分数
通过对17种USGS地球化学参考物质(RMs)的放射化学中子活化分析(RNAA)获得了Cl, Br和I的质量分数,我们已经发表了GGR中的卤素含量(Sekimoto和Ebihara 2017)。除三个均方根外,每种粉末材料分别使用100 ~ 300 mg进行单次分析。经过10分钟的中子照射后,进行快速放射化学净化程序。用再活化法测定化学产率。对每个RM进行多次分析,并获得每个元素的一致值。在17个RMs中,CLB-1、DGPM-1和QLO-1a也被INAA分析。CLB-1和dgpm -1的INAA和RNAA结果一致在4%以内,说明本研究得到的RNAA值是可靠的。与2017年的数据相比,本研究获得的Cl和Br值一致,但所有样品的I值均降低了1/4至1/8。结论:2017年GGR发表的Cl和Br的定量值是可靠的,而I的定量值是不正确的。因此,建议将本研究确定的USGS均方根值中的I含量替换为以前的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information IAG Membership Information Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis Chapter 5 The Inductively Coupled Plasma GGR Handbook of Rock and Mineral Analysis [Chapter 13] Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1