Principles of Uncertainty (Second Edition)

C. Robert
{"title":"Principles of Uncertainty (Second Edition)","authors":"C. Robert","doi":"10.1080/09332480.2021.1885939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new edition of Principles of Uncertainty, the first edition of which I reviewed in JASA (2012), has appeared. I was asked by CRC Press to review the new book; here are some (almost raw) extracts from my report, removing the parts that were addressed by the author before the book went to print. Overall, my enthusiasm for the book, its original (and of course, subjective) defense of the Bayesian approach, and its highly enjoyable style, remains intact, especially when backed by the proof-in-the pudding 2017 Pragmatics of Uncertainty, which I reviewed in a 2019 issue of CHANCE (32(1)). In Chapter 6, the proof of the Central Limit Theorem uses the “smudge” technique, which is to add an independent noise to both the sequence of rvs and its limit. This is most effective and reminds me of quite a similar proof Jacques Neveu used in probability notes at the École Polytechnique, which went under the more-formal denomination of convolution, with the same (commendable) purpose of avoiding Fourier transforms. If anything, I would have favored a slightly more-condensed presentation in fewer than eight pages. In Chapter 7, I found a nice mention of (Hermann) Rubin’s insistence on not separating probability and utility because only the product matters. And another fascinating quote from Keynes, not from his early statistician years, but in 1937 as an established economist:","PeriodicalId":88226,"journal":{"name":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"31 1","pages":"54 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chance (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2021.1885939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new edition of Principles of Uncertainty, the first edition of which I reviewed in JASA (2012), has appeared. I was asked by CRC Press to review the new book; here are some (almost raw) extracts from my report, removing the parts that were addressed by the author before the book went to print. Overall, my enthusiasm for the book, its original (and of course, subjective) defense of the Bayesian approach, and its highly enjoyable style, remains intact, especially when backed by the proof-in-the pudding 2017 Pragmatics of Uncertainty, which I reviewed in a 2019 issue of CHANCE (32(1)). In Chapter 6, the proof of the Central Limit Theorem uses the “smudge” technique, which is to add an independent noise to both the sequence of rvs and its limit. This is most effective and reminds me of quite a similar proof Jacques Neveu used in probability notes at the École Polytechnique, which went under the more-formal denomination of convolution, with the same (commendable) purpose of avoiding Fourier transforms. If anything, I would have favored a slightly more-condensed presentation in fewer than eight pages. In Chapter 7, I found a nice mention of (Hermann) Rubin’s insistence on not separating probability and utility because only the product matters. And another fascinating quote from Keynes, not from his early statistician years, but in 1937 as an established economist:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不确定性原理(第二版)
《不确定性原理》(Principles of Uncertainty)的新版本已经出现,我在《JASA》(2012)中回顾了第一版。CRC出版社请我评论这本新书;以下是我报告中的一些(几乎是原始的)摘录,删除了作者在书付印前写过的部分。总的来说,我对这本书的热情,它对贝叶斯方法的原始(当然是主观的)辩护,以及它非常令人愉快的风格,都保持不变,特别是在我在2019年的《CHANCE》(32(1))上评论过的《2017年不确定性语用学》(proof-in- in-the pudding)的支持下。在第6章中,中心极限定理的证明使用了“涂抹”技术,即在rv序列及其极限中添加独立噪声。这是最有效的,让我想起了Jacques Neveu在École理工学院的概率笔记中使用的一个非常相似的证明,它以更正式的形式命名卷积,同样(值得称赞的)目的是避免傅里叶变换。如果有什么不同的话,我更喜欢在8页以内做一个稍微简洁一点的陈述。在第7章中,我很好地提到(赫尔曼)鲁宾坚持不把概率和效用分开,因为只有产品才重要。凯恩斯的另一句名言,不是他早年做统计学家的时候说的,而是在1937年成为知名经济学家时说的:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple discoveries in causal inference: LATE for the party. Bayes Factors for Forensic Decision Analyses with R Three Welcome Arrivals for 2023: 1. Florence Nightingale Bayesian Probability for Babies Fresh Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1