Perceptions of academic tenure, post-tenure review policies, and organisational commitment in university academic staff

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Australian Journal of Career Development Pub Date : 2019-08-29 DOI:10.1177/1038416219859005
K. Obeng, I. Ugboro
{"title":"Perceptions of academic tenure, post-tenure review policies, and organisational commitment in university academic staff","authors":"K. Obeng, I. Ugboro","doi":"10.1177/1038416219859005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the relationships between perceptions of academic tenure, post-tenure review policies, and three dimensions of organisational commitment (affective, continuance, and normative) in university academic staff. We surveyed a sample of 150 academic staff from 74 universities in the USA that have implemented post-tenure review policies or are contemplating doing so. Then, we tested hypotheses about the relationships between their perceptions of their post-tenure review policies and processes, and organisational commitment. The results showed that perceptions of post-tenure review as a threat to the guarantees of academic tenure were related negatively to affective and normative organisational commitment. The implications of these findings for employment stability and the ability of universities to attract and retain qualified staff are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"30 1","pages":"212 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416219859005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships between perceptions of academic tenure, post-tenure review policies, and three dimensions of organisational commitment (affective, continuance, and normative) in university academic staff. We surveyed a sample of 150 academic staff from 74 universities in the USA that have implemented post-tenure review policies or are contemplating doing so. Then, we tested hypotheses about the relationships between their perceptions of their post-tenure review policies and processes, and organisational commitment. The results showed that perceptions of post-tenure review as a threat to the guarantees of academic tenure were related negatively to affective and normative organisational commitment. The implications of these findings for employment stability and the ability of universities to attract and retain qualified staff are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学学术人员对终身教职、终身教职后审查政策和组织承诺的看法
本研究探讨了大学教职员工对终身教职、终身教职后评审政策的认知与组织承诺的三个维度(情感、延续和规范)之间的关系。我们调查了来自美国74所大学的150名学术人员,这些大学已经实施了终身教职后审查政策或正在考虑这样做。然后,我们测试了关于他们对任期后审查政策和流程的看法与组织承诺之间关系的假设。研究结果表明,将终身教职后评估视为终身教职保障威胁的认知,与情感组织承诺和规范性组织承诺呈负相关。讨论了这些发现对就业稳定性和大学吸引和留住合格工作人员的能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Toward a conceptualization of decent work in Africa: Development and cross-cultural validation of the Decent Work Triad (DWT) in Burkina Faso, Switzerland, and Togo. The relationship between living in regional, remote and rural areas and post-school outcomes: A scoping review Exploratory actions as mediators of the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes: Does exploration type matter? ‘Careering’ – toward radicalism in radical times: Links to human security and sustainable livelihoods Understanding the transition from psychology graduate to post-graduate counselling studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1