Fatal officer involved shootings following the use of TASER conducted energy weapons

H. E. Williams, Daniel Reinhard, Temitope B Oriola
{"title":"Fatal officer involved shootings following the use of TASER conducted energy weapons","authors":"H. E. Williams, Daniel Reinhard, Temitope B Oriola","doi":"10.1177/0032258X211030322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the risks and causes of fatal officer involved shootings (OIS) following ineffective applications of TASER conducted energy weapons (CEWs). Content analysis of open-source records resulted in quantitative and qualitative characteristics and conditions associated with the ineffective application of CEWs resulting in fatal OIS. Research and field-use data indicate that CEWs were ineffective in as many as 47% of applications. From 1985 through 2020, 1349 fatal OIS followed ineffective applications of CEWs in the United States. Officers were more likely first to use CEWs to subdue minority suspects before fatally shooting them than they were with White suspects. In 14 instances since 2004, suspects shot and killed 16 law enforcement officers following ineffective applications of CEWs. The policy implications of the findings are articulated. This is the first study to examine the use of deadly force following the ineffective use of TASER technology.","PeriodicalId":22939,"journal":{"name":"The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles","volume":"31 1","pages":"713 - 733"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X211030322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study investigates the risks and causes of fatal officer involved shootings (OIS) following ineffective applications of TASER conducted energy weapons (CEWs). Content analysis of open-source records resulted in quantitative and qualitative characteristics and conditions associated with the ineffective application of CEWs resulting in fatal OIS. Research and field-use data indicate that CEWs were ineffective in as many as 47% of applications. From 1985 through 2020, 1349 fatal OIS followed ineffective applications of CEWs in the United States. Officers were more likely first to use CEWs to subdue minority suspects before fatally shooting them than they were with White suspects. In 14 instances since 2004, suspects shot and killed 16 law enforcement officers following ineffective applications of CEWs. The policy implications of the findings are articulated. This is the first study to examine the use of deadly force following the ineffective use of TASER technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致命的警官涉及使用泰瑟进行能量武器后的枪击事件
本研究调查了在TASER传导能量武器(CEWs)无效应用后发生的致命警察枪击(OIS)的风险和原因。通过对开源记录的内容分析,得出了与CEWs无效应用导致致死性OIS相关的定量和定性特征和条件。研究和现场使用数据表明,CEWs在多达47%的应用中是无效的。从1985年到2020年,在美国,由于CEWs的无效应用,有1349例致死性OIS。与白人嫌疑人相比,警察更有可能首先使用cew制服少数族裔嫌疑人,然后将其击毙。自2004年以来,在14起案件中,犯罪嫌疑人开枪打死了16名执法人员。研究结果对政策的影响是明确的。这是首个在泰瑟枪技术无效使用后对致命武力使用进行调查的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “A question of credibility: A focus group study examining the experiences of workers attending counter-terrorism training in UK crowded places” Process mapping homicide investigations and estimating resource requirements for homicide units: Findings from a case study in the United States “Able to stop things from escalating” – Stakeholders’ perspectives of police, ambulance and mental health co-response to 911-mental health calls Lessons learnt from roadside collisions: A Canadian police perspective Evidence presentation in suspect interviews: A review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1