Jasmin Begum, A. Ullah, Iftekharul Islam, Md. Al-Amin Chowdhury, Md. Abdullah Al Mansur, Utpak Kumar Das
{"title":"Comparison between Interrupted X Suture and Continuous Suture for Closure of Midline Incision in Emergency Laparotomy : A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Jasmin Begum, A. Ullah, Iftekharul Islam, Md. Al-Amin Chowdhury, Md. Abdullah Al Mansur, Utpak Kumar Das","doi":"10.3329/cmoshmcj.v21i2.63130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Wound dehiscence is disruption of any or all of the layers in a wound. At around 7–10 days post operatively leakage of clear sero-sanguinous fluid from the wound is usually the first indicator of burst abdomen. The patient usually feels something ‘giving away’ at this time.It may occur in 3-14.5% cases and is very distressing to the patient.Number of methods of closure of midline laparotomy wound have been introduced in the past to prevent this outcome. The study to compare the result of continuous and interrupted closure of midline emergency laparotomy in respect of burst abdomen. \nMaterials and methods: This randomized controlled trial study was carried out in the Department of Surgery Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, duration January 2017 to December 2017. A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study. Data were collected, statistical analyses were obtained by using window based computer software devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-23). \nResults: 250 patients in group A and 250 in B. Surgical wound related post-operative complications were found in 30.4% of the study subjects (n=152).Wound dehiscence was found in 11% subjects, surgical site infection was found in 18.4% subjects and incisional hernia in 1%.All these complications were significantly higher in continuous suture group than interrupted group (p<0.001).Wound dehiscence in 20 subjects, treated with interrupted sutures and in 40 subjects (35 wound dehiscence and 5 incisional hernia)treated with continuous suture. The Relative Risk (RR) of developing wound dehiscence post-operatively was found to be 0.63 (95% CI 0.33 – 0.72) for interrupted suture. This was statistically significant (p<0.05). \nConclusion: The interrupted X suture technique is better than continuous suture technique in prevention of burst abdomen in emergency midline laparotomy. \nChatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.21 (2); July 2022; Page 52-56","PeriodicalId":9788,"journal":{"name":"Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cmoshmcj.v21i2.63130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Wound dehiscence is disruption of any or all of the layers in a wound. At around 7–10 days post operatively leakage of clear sero-sanguinous fluid from the wound is usually the first indicator of burst abdomen. The patient usually feels something ‘giving away’ at this time.It may occur in 3-14.5% cases and is very distressing to the patient.Number of methods of closure of midline laparotomy wound have been introduced in the past to prevent this outcome. The study to compare the result of continuous and interrupted closure of midline emergency laparotomy in respect of burst abdomen.
Materials and methods: This randomized controlled trial study was carried out in the Department of Surgery Chittagong Medical College Hospital, Chattogram, duration January 2017 to December 2017. A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study. Data were collected, statistical analyses were obtained by using window based computer software devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-23).
Results: 250 patients in group A and 250 in B. Surgical wound related post-operative complications were found in 30.4% of the study subjects (n=152).Wound dehiscence was found in 11% subjects, surgical site infection was found in 18.4% subjects and incisional hernia in 1%.All these complications were significantly higher in continuous suture group than interrupted group (p<0.001).Wound dehiscence in 20 subjects, treated with interrupted sutures and in 40 subjects (35 wound dehiscence and 5 incisional hernia)treated with continuous suture. The Relative Risk (RR) of developing wound dehiscence post-operatively was found to be 0.63 (95% CI 0.33 – 0.72) for interrupted suture. This was statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The interrupted X suture technique is better than continuous suture technique in prevention of burst abdomen in emergency midline laparotomy.
Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.21 (2); July 2022; Page 52-56
背景:创面裂开是指创面任一层或全部层的破裂。术后7-10天左右,伤口有清晰的血清液渗出,通常是腹部破裂的第一个指标。这个时候病人通常会觉得有些东西“泄露”了。它可能发生在3-14.5%的病例中,对患者来说非常痛苦。为了防止这种结果,过去已经介绍了许多关闭剖腹开腹中线伤口的方法。本研究比较连续与间断中线急诊剖腹手术治疗腹壁破裂的效果。材料与方法:本随机对照试验研究于2017年1月至2017年12月在Chattogram吉大港医学院附属医院外科进行。共有500名患者参加了这项研究。采用SPSS-23 (statistical Packages for Social Sciences)软件进行数据收集和统计分析。结果:A组250例,b组250例,术后切口相关并发症发生率为30.4% (n=152)。伤口裂开占11%,手术部位感染占18.4%,切口疝占1%。这些并发症连续缝合组明显高于间断缝合组(p<0.001)。伤口裂开20例,采用间断缝合治疗;伤口裂开35例,切口疝5例,采用连续缝合治疗。中断缝合术后创面裂开的相对危险度(RR)为0.63 (95% CI 0.33 ~ 0.72)。差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:间断X线缝合技术在预防急诊剖腹切开术中腹裂的效果优于连续缝合技术。上海医科大学医学院;月,(2);2022年7月;页面52-56