The Undeclared, Declassified: West New Guinea and the 1969 Act of Free Choice

Greg Poulgrain
{"title":"The Undeclared, Declassified: West New Guinea and the 1969 Act of Free Choice","authors":"Greg Poulgrain","doi":"10.14203/jmi.v48i1.1185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the ‘Act of Free Choice’ (AFC/Pepera) whereby Indonesia officially took control of West New Guinea under the auspices of the United Nations (UN).  The event itself took place in 1969 as preordained in the terms of the New York Agreement of August 1962 drawn up by US diplomat, Ellsworth Bunker. In both the 1962 Agreement and the 1969 AFC, Adam Malik was the principal Indonesian participant; and in both, according to his 1969 Report, the role of the UN was really no more than a bystander. Yet it was the authority of the UN which ultimately provided approval of Indonesian sovereignty as the outcome of the AFC. How this came about is evident from a close inspection of US declassified telegrams from 1966-1999. Two principal questions arise: the first pertains to the motivation of the various US diplomats involved, such as Bunker, Marshall Green (US Ambassador to Indonesia 1965-69) and Henry Kissinger, who were linked to Rockefeller mining interests focused on gaining access to the world’s largest gold mine in West New Guinea; and the second pertains to the rights of the Papuan people as the inhabitants of the territory in question. In the written words and opinions of the persons who were actually involved in the preparation and execution of the AFC/Pepera, there is often no compunction in disregarding UN principles, and yet there is a willingness, when it suits, to utilize UN authority as the arbiter of international justice.","PeriodicalId":20616,"journal":{"name":"Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyarakat Biodiversitas Indonesia","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyarakat Biodiversitas Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v48i1.1185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article deals with the ‘Act of Free Choice’ (AFC/Pepera) whereby Indonesia officially took control of West New Guinea under the auspices of the United Nations (UN).  The event itself took place in 1969 as preordained in the terms of the New York Agreement of August 1962 drawn up by US diplomat, Ellsworth Bunker. In both the 1962 Agreement and the 1969 AFC, Adam Malik was the principal Indonesian participant; and in both, according to his 1969 Report, the role of the UN was really no more than a bystander. Yet it was the authority of the UN which ultimately provided approval of Indonesian sovereignty as the outcome of the AFC. How this came about is evident from a close inspection of US declassified telegrams from 1966-1999. Two principal questions arise: the first pertains to the motivation of the various US diplomats involved, such as Bunker, Marshall Green (US Ambassador to Indonesia 1965-69) and Henry Kissinger, who were linked to Rockefeller mining interests focused on gaining access to the world’s largest gold mine in West New Guinea; and the second pertains to the rights of the Papuan people as the inhabitants of the territory in question. In the written words and opinions of the persons who were actually involved in the preparation and execution of the AFC/Pepera, there is often no compunction in disregarding UN principles, and yet there is a willingness, when it suits, to utilize UN authority as the arbiter of international justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《未公开、解密:西新几内亚和1969年自由选择法案》
本文涉及“自由选择法案”(AFC/Pepera),即印度尼西亚在联合国主持下正式控制西新几内亚。按照美国外交官邦克(Ellsworth Bunker)在1962年8月起草的《纽约协定》(New York Agreement)的规定,这一事件本身发生在1969年。在1962年的协定和1969年的亚足联中,亚当·马利克都是印尼的主要参与者;根据他1969年的报告,在这两件事上,联合国的作用实际上不过是一个旁观者。然而,作为亚足联的结果,是联合国的权威机构最终批准了印尼的主权。仔细研究1966年至1999年美国解密的电报,就能看出这一切是如何发生的。两个主要问题由此产生:第一个问题与参与其中的多位美国外交官的动机有关,比如邦克、马歇尔·格林(Marshall Green, 1965-69年美国驻印尼大使)和亨利·基辛格(Henry Kissinger),他们与洛克菲勒的矿业利益有关,这些利益的重点是进入西新几内亚世界上最大的金矿;第二个问题涉及巴布亚人民作为有关领土居民的权利。在实际参与准备和执行AFC/Pepera的人的书面文字和意见中,无视联合国的原则往往没有任何悔意,但在适当的时候,他们愿意利用联合国的权威作为国际正义的仲裁者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM INFORMASI PENJUALAN DAN PEMESANAN METAL ROOF BERBASIS WEB (STUDI KASUS CV OJAMI METAL ROOF) PEMANFAATAN LIMBAH BATUBARA FLY ASH DAN BOTTOM ASH SEBAGAI CAMPURAN MEDIA TANAM PERANCANGAN SISTEM INFORMASI PENJUALAN KREDIT MOTOR HONDA BERBASIS WEB PADA PT. USAHA CIPTA MANDIRI SISTEM INFORMASI PENGAJUAN PROGRAM KEMITRAAN BERBASIS WEB PADA PT. ELINCOM SUKSES ABADI DI CILEGON PERANCANGAN SISTEM INFORMASI PENJUALAN SPAREPART DAN STOK BARANG DI BENGKEL PADASUKA MOTOR MENGGUNAKAN METODE FIFO BERBASIS WEB
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1